I couldn't find a case for bulls, but where it comes to humans, here's an example.So, a bull can be a milk cow if he so chooses to be a she...got it...
This has been known since Darwin's day:It has been previously reported that men with and without known disease can produce milk, but no studies to date have demonstrated that their secretion contains milk constituents produced specifically by the breast. The present study shows the presence of lactose, alpha-lactalbumin, and lactoferrin in the breast secretion of a 27-yr-old male who had galactorrhea associated with hyperprolactinaemia. The concentrations of lactose, proteins, and electrolytes in the breast secretion of this man are within the range of colostrum and milk obtained from normal lactating women.
Suck on that..."It is well known that in the males of all mammals, including man, rudimentary mammae exist. These in several instances have become well developed, and have yielded a copious supply of milk. Their essential identity in the two sexes is likewise shown by their occasional sympathetic enlargement in both during an attack of the measles. Their origin, however, can hardly be due to inheritance from a male ancestor. It is much more probable that they have been developed in the female, and have been transmitted to the male in a latent state, as in the case of many other secondary sexual characters."
— Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray. (Volume 1, p. 211)
Read online at Darwin Online
Full text at Project Gutenberg
I doubt She would agree with you.
I doubt you know what you're talking about. Imagine that. So easy to say.
Lees
So which is is it? God is masculine or god is? They don’t mean the same thing. The former limits god to a human trait. The latter doesn’t. What force greater than god defines god? And how do you know this? Who are you to tell us what gods is? I will let it do the talking for itself.
You have quite the imagination.Pay attention. 'God is'. And God is masculine. They do mean the same thing. No, the human trait is because 'God is'. Geen that was easy. Nothing defines greater than God. There is no greater than God. I am a child of God and one who knows my Father, and Lord Who is Jesus Christ.
Who the hell are you?
Lees
Smarter, more loyal, more dependable, stronger, a better teacher, a better student...Why did God choose to be a man?
I also doubt She finds uptight religious types with NO sense of humor very entertaining.I doubt you know what you're talking about. Imagine that. So easy to say.
Lees
I also doubt She finds uptight religious types with NO sense of humor very entertaining.
I doubt you know what you're talking about. Imagine that. So easy to say.Pay attention. 'God is'. And God is masculine. They do mean the same thing. No, the human trait is because 'God is'. Geen that was easy. Nothing defines greater than God. There is no greater than God. I am a child of God and one who knows my Father, and Lord Who is Jesus Christ.
Who the hell are you?
Lees
Sounds like TrumpThen shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure."
Pay attention. 'God is'. And God is masculine. They do mean the same thing. No, the human trait is because 'God is'. Geen that was easy. Nothing defines greater than God. There is no greater than God. I am a child of God and one who knows my Father, and Lord Who is Jesus Christ.
Who the hell are you?
Lees
Well, God has His own sense of humor. He is quite amused at the mockers and empty words of the unbelieving. (Ps. 2:1-5) "Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us brek their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us. He that sitteth in the heavens shall laugh: the Lord shall have them in derision. Then shall he speak unto them in his wrath, and vex them in his sore displeasure."
Lees
O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, you who kill the prophets and stone those who are sent to you! How often I have longed to gather your children together as a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, but you would have none of it!No, God is masculine, a man. He is Spirit, and He is masculine.
No, God is not transgender and not female. He never has and never will exist as a woman.
No, the case can be made that the transgender is a picture of absolute confusion and perversion.
Lees
God created humankind in his own image,No, God is masculine. Bible 2.0 is not the Bible. (Heb. 1:2-3) "Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son....Who bing the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person....."
Jesus Christ is the very image of God in every way. Physically and Spiritually.
Lees
I sure do...Yet surely a believer should agree that God created and defined all things.
Since God is a spirit, it cannot be a physical likeness...we are capable of displaying similar attributes...love/hate/justice/mercy...If Christians believe that Man was created in God's image, what does that phrase mean?
I sure do...
"male and female he created them." Genesis 1:27
Since God is a spirit, it cannot be a physical likeness...we are capable of displaying similar attributes...love/hate/justice/mercy...
But it is fair to call God a creator, isn't it? To call God good? To say that God is capable of understanding? Is it possible that to the extent we are able to understand whatever is best and most essential to the nature of a good person, we might also understand then the nature of God?You are applying human traits to god. You are pretending to define the substance of god by calling it a spirit. God does not bend to human definitions. God transcends human concepts like spirit. God is not subject to such things at all. God is above all human emotions and concepts. God is ineffable and inexplicable. No one can know god or anything about it.
But it is fair to call God a creator, isn't it? To call God good? To say that God is capable of understanding? Is it possible that to the extent we are able to understand whatever is best and most essential to the nature of a good person, we might also understand then the nature of God?
Wrong, God applied His traits to humans when He created us...You are applying human traits to god. You are pretending to define the substance of god by calling it a spirit. God does not bend to human definitions. God transcends human concepts like spirit. God is not subject to such things at all. God is above all human emotions and concepts. God is ineffable and inexplicable. No one can know god or anything about it.