• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Why Defund PBS?

Well, that's certainly very interesting viewing. I think I'd like to watch both of those.

Yes. We definitely want PBS. It is in the interest of the people to have non-profit news and reporting.

When money taints reporting, it's well, tainted.
 
Because it's propaganda
PBS is an important source of science programming and long form investigative journalism, both sorely lacking in MSM.

PBS is ALSO the source of constant left wing nagging about the burning LGBTQIAPOC issues of transgender rights, Black century old grievances, and the plight of Palestinian terrorist supporters, among other things that are of interest to about 10% of the public. For the rest of us, it's like being force fed Brussels sprouts.

If PBS were fixated on MAGA's favorite issues, it would have probably more people interested, but I doubt that liberals would think it deserved public funding.
 
Because if the public is going to fund a news media outlet they have every reason to expect it to be run as a professional news organization and not as a professional public relations arm of the DNC.
 
PBS is an important source of science programming and long form investigative journalism, both sorely lacking in MSM.
False it's propaganda masquerading as science. A lot of the times I've seen denial on it.
PBS is ALSO the source of constant left wing nagging about the burning LGBTQIAPOC issues of transgender rights, Black century old grievances, and the plight of Palestinian terrorist supporters, among other things that are of interest to about 10% of the public. For the rest of us, it's like being force fed Brussels sprouts.

If PBS were fixated on MAGA's favorite issues, it would have probably more people interested, but I doubt that liberals would think it deserved public funding.
You make a point if it was right wing propaganda right wing people would probably like it but left wing and interest people would object and their objection would be just as legitimate as mine.

The percentage you posted was about science science has no political agenda. If it does it's not science it's lying.
 
Well, that's certainly very interesting viewing. I think I'd like to watch both of those.

Yes. We definitely want PBS. It is in the interest of the people to have non-profit news and reporting.

When money taints reporting, it's well, tainted.
Don't they do those things where they receive donations donate to it.
 
They are the target demographic of the sesame Street and I imagine if it wasn't for sesame Street there would be no PBS.

Ah yes. Evil Leftist show Sesame Street that brainwashes kids to... *check notes*... "be empathetic and compassionate and treat other people with kindness even if they are different".

They must be stopped.
 
Ah yes. Evil Leftist show Sesame Street that brainwashes kids to... *check notes*... "be empathetic and compassionate and treat other people with kindness even if they are different".
Stupid brainless lemmings. That's not compassionate it's evil.
They must be stopped.
No they can just survive commercially. Our government shouldn't be able to propagandize our own people.
 
Stupid brainless lemmings. That's not compassionate it's evil.

No they can just survive commercially. Our government shouldn't be able to propagandize our own people.

Treating people with kindness even if they are different is "evil" according to our resident MAGAt.

Does the government not propagandizing the people apply to Trump's birthday pity parade?
 
So you're an antivax conspiracy theorist?
No. PBS is lying to children about what vaccines do.

They only protect the person who is vaccinated that cannot protect anyone else. This was understood in the 19th century
Let me guess, you think "the jab" changes your DNA and contains microchips, don't you?
No I think the fact show that children were the least affected demographic by the actual virus.
 
It is going to be the rural markets that will suffer from this.
 
It is going to be the rural markets that will suffer from this.
Oh no now the rural communities might understand that vaccines don't protect other people from the virus. Heaven forbid they disobey their pharmaceutical company Masters.
 
It's not about treating people with kindness. It's about calling evil kindness. Brainwashing.

Yes lying about what kindness is, is evil.

What?

What "evil" does Sesame Street teach?

Do you believe people who are different from you should be treated with malice or kindness?

Trump's military parade was the government propagandizing people. Did you oppose it?
 
No. PBS is lying to children about what vaccines do.

They only protect the person who is vaccinated that cannot protect anyone else. This was understood in the 19th century
Herd immunity is a thing.
No I think the fact show that children were the least affected demographic by the actual virus.
Long Covid is becoming a real problem in kids.

 
Oh no now the rural communities might understand that vaccines don't protect other people from the virus. Heaven forbid they disobey their pharmaceutical company Masters.

Source for this claim?

Let's see what insane conspiracy theorist you quote.
 
Oh no now the rural communities might understand that vaccines don't protect other people from the virus. Heaven forbid they disobey their pharmaceutical company Masters.
Killing funding for PBS and NPR will affect rural markets more because those are the markets that rely on the funding the most.

That is just a fact.
 
Back
Top Bottom