- Joined
- Mar 21, 2021
- Messages
- 496
- Reaction score
- 280
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
It's a pretty ****ing simple case. You watch the video of the murder and you vote Guilty.
Who needs notes?
Who needs notes?
Its a simple case for the simple minded right enough.It's a pretty ****ing simple case. You watch the video of the murder and you vote Guilty.
Who needs notes?
A guilty verdict should be obvious for anyone who paid attention, but the reality is that most high profile cases have someone transcribing the events.
OP is confused. They can have their notes, Judge Cahill said they can't have a trial transcript.What do you mean "can't have notes"?
Are you saying the judge let the jury take their own notes and has decided they can't bring them into the jury room? That'd be odd. Typically, you tell the jury that it's their collective memory that controls, that they may use their own notes as an aid, but if their memory conflicts with another juror's notes, they are to trust their memory.
OP is confused. They can have their notes, Judge Cahill said they can't have a trial transcript.
I was just making a point, honestly.OP is confused. They can have their notes, Judge Cahill said they can't have a trial transcript.
There is no point, only incorrect information causing confusion.I was just making a point, honestly.
Silence, fake Liberal. The point is to believe your eyes.There is no point, only incorrect information causing confusion.
I have no clue what that is supposed to mean.Silence, fake Liberal. The point is to believe your eyes.
“The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.” ― George Orwell, 1984