Wrong.
It belongs to no-one unless you are endorsing slavery which is illegal.
Quite the opposite. YOU ARE ENDORSING SLAVERY!
How the **** would you go about becoming more or less of a member of a species? :roll: :doh:lamo
He was quite accurate. PARENTHOOD IS NOT SLAVERY, stop derping so hard!
Yes you do know. It was evident by your wrongly worded question.
One is born and one is a fetus. As you were already told.
I have referenced SEVERAL medical textbooks that agree with me and state explicitly that we are human beings from moment of our conception.Wrong.
Your unsubstantiated opinion is meaningless.
And again.
It is none of your damn business what a woman does with her clump of cells/zygote/embryo/fetus.
It is none of your damn business what a woman does with her clump of cells/zygote/embryo/fetus.
If a person is FORCED to SERVE ANOTHER... it is indeed involuntary servitude.
Quite the opposite. YOU ARE ENDORSING SLAVERY!
13th Amendment: Anti-abortion laws create mandatory motherhood and force "involuntary servitude," which is banned by this amendment.
Whether being forced to give birth (which is "involuntary servitude") or force to labor, support, maintain the needs, care for, raise an unwanted child...IS "INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE!'. Again, this is a violation of the 13th Amendment.
Involuntary servitude is being forced to serve another...
If a person is FORCED to SERVE ANOTHER...it is indeed involuntary servitude. That is against the 13th Amendment.
You are confused. As rights belong to those born. Not the unborn.It is everyone's business when one human kills another human in aggression. It is the role of government to prevent that action if possible, and always to punish the aggressor.
Our offspring are not property.
:dohAgain, biologically, what is the difference between a human being that is born and one that is not besides its location?
You obviously cannot answer the question but I love to see pro-choicers back themselves into corners that they are unable to get out of.
Your sad opinion is not substantiated.I have referenced SEVERAL medical textbooks that agree with me and state explicitly that we are human beings from moment of our conception.
YOU have only stated your opinion (that you are unable to defend) which is quite sad.
Yes her fetus. And your irrelevant comparison is irrelevant. Trying to confuse her fetus with slavery is absurd.Her fetus?
Are you now also endorsing slavery? Are you saying that one human being owns another human being?
You just keep walking into doors. You should either learn something or abandon this debate as it is becoming very embarrassing for you?
This debate isn't about what women are doing to their own bodies. It is about what they are doing to another human being's body. The child's body does not belong to the woman, so what she is doing to the child's body isn't a thing that she is doing to her own body. Perhaps you should learn the facts before you debate this topic.
You are confused. As rights belong to those born. Not the unborn.
:dohOnly to a bigot, to someone who doesn't believe in equality.
:dohThis country was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal. You're part of the problem, I'm part of the solution.
:doh
Said the one with the inflexible opinion.
Really? You have to ask what is the difference between one cell and an infant that sustains his or her own life functions?Again, biologically, what is the difference between a human being that is born and one that is not besides its location?
No you have misrepresented a number of quotations.I have referenced SEVERAL medical textbooks that agree with me and state explicitly that we are human beings from moment of our conception.
There goes the confusion again.Oh, so you are flexible, then, on protecting the rights inherent to all human beings? Or are you inflexible in your desire to restrict personhood from the unborn? Pretty sure it's the latter.
It is against the law to force human beings to work or provide services or resources without just compensation.So then it should be against the law to force human beings to work?
And they never considered a single cell as a man.Only to a bigot, to someone who doesn't believe in equality.
This country was founded on the proposition that all men are created equal.
Extremism has never been part of solution to any problem.I'm part of the solution.
So then it should be against the law to force human beings to work? As a matter of fact, according to you, it should be against the law to call 911 and expect the police officers to respond to your call and SERVE YOU, correct?
Yep, and that's quite a large number, regardless of what the anti-choice crowd would like everyone to believe.
So in effect, you are saying that it is slavery to FORCE a man to work in order to provide for his 7 year old daughter and his 2 year old son?
Forcing a boy to go to school could also be construed according to you, is that right?
I love arguing with you guys because the arguments that you come up with are SO EASY to dismantle and tear apart. I could do this in my sleep.
13th Amendment: Anti-abortion laws create mandatory motherhood and force "involuntary servitude," which is banned by this amendment.
Whether being forced to give birth (which is "involuntary servitude") or force to labor, support, maintain the needs, care for, raise an unwanted child...IS "INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE!'. Again, this is a violation of the 13th Amendment.
A clump of cells/zygote/embryo/fetus does not have any inherent rights.
:dohThat is wrong, and it is bigoted.
I am serious. Tell me, what magic was worked on the infant that gave it the protection of the law when it made that 7 inch journey down the birth canal. What did it become that it wasn't before? What changed besides its geographical location? (inside/outside).
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?