LMFAO! "Jveritas" is a Freeper since 2001 who writes stuff like this (and this is just in the last 3 days!):
I am just your humble freeper
I am very frustrated as well. I think the President decided four years ago to fight and win the war in the field rather than argue with the traitors and their media about WMD and other pre-war issues.
Yep because the President did not go along with terrorist appeasers like the UN, EU, China, and Russia.
This traitor Reid will say and do what ever he wants because has a treasonous liberal media to cover for him. Anyway the President will crush this traitor like a bug.
Harry Reid is one of the nastiest, meanest, rudest, and most arrogant traitors to ever reach a high political office.
With these traitors it is hard to predict what they are going to do. They will only think about power and whether this treasonous bill will give them better chance at power or reduce this chance, that is all what they care about.
Being an extreme hypocrite is an important trait of liberals. It is rarely that you encounter a liberal who is not an extreme hypocrite. Liberals are hypocrite on every issue.
I cannot believe that the democrats are that stupid to think that the meanest, nastiest, rudest, most arrogant, most fake, most uncharismatic, most dull person to ever run for President like Hillary Clinton is going win the Presidency. The bigger problem for her is that no matter how hard she tries she cannot hide her horrible character, her nasty screeching voice, and her mean facial looks, and the media cannot cover this for her no matter how hard they try.
No doubt. He is one of the meanest, nastiest Senators to ever take office. But worst, he is a TRAITOR.
We just despised his [Clinton's] utterly failed and do nothing Presidency that lead to a lot of problems including 9/11 terrorists attacks.
It is time for a national prime time speech from the President to expose these traitors. We do not care anymore about whether a national speech will raise the popularity of the President or not, we are beyond this idiocy of public support and we should not care about it anymore, we need to expose the traitors at home and fight them and we need to crush the terrorists abroad and destroy them forever. Wars are fought and won by a determined and strong leader like President Bush, by the military might of our brave troops, and by the support of a minority of Patriots. The independence war and the civil war were supported, fought and won by a minority of Patriots. I came to that in this war.
User Posts
He sounds about as objective and balanced as PTSDKid.
Sorry. I'm not accepting him blindly as an objective source of information about the Iraqi documents.
But if these documents prove an "ongoing corroboration" between Hussein and Al-Queda, why weren't they cited by the 2006 Senate Intellgence Committee.
Oh really? Not according to your man Jveritas:
"This is a Conservative Republican forum not for left wing liberal democrats."
User Posts
Great. When do we get a report from an objective source proving this? Why hasn't the WH reviewed these docs? They could use a little good PR for their war.
Not Al-Queda.
Fedayeen - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In any case that was in April 2003, after the invasion. Not proof of an ongoing corroboration.
From the 2006 (the year the Republicans still had contol of the Senate) Senate Intellegence Report:
Conclusion 2: Postwar findings have indicated that there was only one meeting between representatives of Saddam Hussein and representatives of al-Qaeda. These findings also identified two occasions "not reported prior to the war, in which
Saddam Hussein rebuffed meeting requests from an al-Qa'ida operative.
The Intelligence Community has not found any other evidence of meetings between al-Qa'ida and Iraq."
Conclusion 4: "Postwar findings support the April 2002 Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) assessment that there was
no credible reporting on al-Qa'ida training at Salman Pak or anywhere else in Iraq. There have been no credible reports since the war that Iraq trained al-Qa'ida operatives at Salman Pak to conduct or support transnational terrorist operations."
Is that what the freepers are saying?
I'm willing to bet that the Senate Intellegence Committee had better access to DOCEX that you.