• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

Who's Spinning Intel? Captured Iraqi documents tell a different story

Trajan Octavian Titus said:
It doesn't lack any credibility he was providing the President with the consensus of all 16 members of the intelligence community.
Click to expand...

Course not. Tenant deserved that Medal of Freedom for saying the WMDs were a slam dunk.

DOCEX
Click to expand...

You mean the Weekly Standard version of it?

The 2006 intelligence report is a joke.
Click to expand...

So they're lying.

DOCEX.
Click to expand...

You mean the Weekly Standard version of it?


Based on what? Oh ya they took the statements of other AQ members at face value and said that we shouldn't believe Al-Libi, it makes no sense.

We should believe Al-Libi due to the fact that DOCEX proves he was telling the truth.
Click to expand...

And we know Al-Libi doesn't lie, except when he lied about recanting his testimony, and getting tortured in Egypt, because that would never happen.




It's your lucky day I found translations of DOCEX that prove the connections:

If you notice that while the link is broken it is a link to the DOCEX release from the Pentagon that has already been taken down.
Click to expand...

No one disputes the 1995 meeting. All the intel reports say nothing else came of it.

And that is how you say that an ongoing corroboration between Hussein and Iraq is an "undisputed fact"?
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
Here's another good one:

[/B]
Click to expand...

Sorry, I don't view posts at the Free Republic as legitimate sources. Unless you want to concede that Moveon and Democraticunderground posts are legitimate sources as well.
 
Iriemon said:
LOL -- if you are relying on Free Republic posts as your source for the "undisputed fact" of Husseins ongoing corroboration with Al-Queda, I'll rest my case.
Click to expand...

What a freaking joke, for the last week you have been demanding the translations of the captured Iraqi documents and when I finally find a place that has them you dismiss them as inconsequential now run along back to your fantasy world in which these documents don't exist because god knows it would be better for you than admitting you were wrong.
 
Typical tactic of the leftest. Just dismiss the facts out of hand. The fact is if they did use these sources they'd be much better informed and save us a lot of time having to post the facts here.
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
What a freaking joke, for the last week you have been demanding the translations of the captured Iraqi documents and when I finally find a place that has them you dismiss them as inconsequential now run along back to your fantasy world in which these documents don't exist because god knows it would be better for you than admitting you were wrong.
Click to expand...

"Freaking joke" = citing the Free Republic as a source of your "undisputed facts"
 
Stinger said:
Actually they had been reaffirmed right here. As I said try posting some facts yourself and not assertions as you do here. Simple dismissals and baseless assertions do not substitute for facts and rebutal.
Click to expand...
So let's see here, it's factual because you say it is no matter how many times it has been debunked on this site?:roll: un huh.
 
Originally Posted by Stinger View Post
Actually they had been reaffirmed right here. As I said try posting some facts yourself and not assertions as you do here. Simple dismissals and baseless assertions do not substitute for facts and rebutal.
So let's see here, it's factual because you say it is no matter how many times it has been debunked on this site? un huh.
Click to expand...

So let's see, first you get it wrong by saying it's 'just because I say so' when it is ToT who is posting the documented evidence, then you try again to dismiss out of hand the page after page after page of evidence ToT has posted without anything to back up your assertions. We are just suppose to dismiss all the evidence 'just because you say so.'

Try refutting the evidence posted, your simple dismissals refute nothing.
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
You haven't debunked jackshit infact it is you who deny the Iraqi/AQ ties who have been thoroughly debunked.
Click to expand...
You and stinger both, still holding on to jackshit for dear old life when this whole myth has been debunked over and over both on this site, and even through self admission by the president. Are you calling bush a liar?
 
Stinger said:
Originally Posted by Stinger View Post
Actually they had been reaffirmed right here. As I said try posting some facts yourself and not assertions as you do here. Simple dismissals and baseless assertions do not substitute for facts and rebutal.


So let's see, first you get it wrong by saying it's 'just because I say so' when it is ToT who is posting the documented evidence, then you try again to dismiss out of hand the page after page after page of evidence ToT has posted without anything to back up your assertions. We are just suppose to dismiss all the evidence 'just because you say so.'

Try refutting the evidence posted, your simple dismissals refute nothing.
Click to expand...
Wow, no surprise at all here; you're argument now goes along the lines, because tot says so then it must be so.:roll:
 
jfuh said:
You and stinger both, still holding on to jackshit for dear old life when this whole myth has been debunked over and over both on this site, and even through self admission by the president. Are you calling bush a liar?
Click to expand...

dodge........................
 
jfuh said:
Wow, no surprise at all here; you're argument now goes along the lines, because tot says so then it must be so.:roll:
Click to expand...


dodge............................my post clearly noted his posting of the documented evidence which you have yet to regute. Your stating otherwise is a flat out lie.
 
jfuh said:
You and stinger both, still holding on to jackshit for dear old life when this whole myth has been debunked over and over both on this site, and even through self admission by the president. Are you calling bush a liar?
Click to expand...

GWB never said that AQ and Iraq didn't have ties. Again it is you who has debunked as I have done all throughout this thread.
 
The desperation of the apologetics here:lamo. You should both take a class in how to properly fold a tin foil hat.
Saddam never had ties with AQ nor any responsibility whatsoever for 9/11.
 
jfuh said:
The desperation of the apologetics here:lamo. You should both take a class in how to properly fold a tin foil hat.
Saddam never had ties with AQ nor any responsibility whatsoever for 9/11.
Click to expand...

The sad dodges and baseless dismissals are ****ing hilarious, you've become a joke in my book, I have provided an abundance of evidence that there were connections and you have yet to even comment on them, now run along back to your fantasy world in which Saddam had no ties to AQ.
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
The sad dodges and baseless dismissals are ****ing hilarious, you've become a joke in my book, I have provided an abundance of evidence that there were connections and you have yet to even comment on them, now run along back to your fantasy world in which Saddam had no ties to AQ.
Click to expand...

I wrote you off as a a joke weeks ago. :2wave:
 
jfuh said:
The desperation of the apologetics here:lamo. You should both take a class in how to properly fold a tin foil hat.
Click to expand...

And you have yet to refute the official documents I see.

Saddam never had ties with AQ
Click to expand...

Already shown to be a lie.

nor any responsibility whatsoever for 9/11.
Click to expand...

Strawdog arguement, no one ever claimed he did.

You're so easy to shoot down.
 
ARealConservative said:
I wrote you off as a a joke weeks ago. :2wave:
Click to expand...

THAT is suppose to refute the documented evidence ToT posted?????? :2rofll:


Looks obviously like a :surrenderto me.

You and jfuh really think your faux declarations refute the facts as posted in this thread??
 
Trajan Octavian Titus said:
The sad dodges and baseless dismissals are ****ing hilarious, you've become a joke in my book, I have provided an abundance of evidence that there were connections and you have yet to even comment on them, now run along back to your fantasy world in which Saddam had no ties to AQ.
Click to expand...
:lamo I don't know what's worse, that you actually believe your own lies or that you think it's only spin that Saddam had no ties to AQ.
You and stinger both need to go along with your little conspiracy theories; here's another one for you, 9/11 was an inside job.:lamoInstead of your proclamations of "very conservative" I think you should both just change your leans to "very apologetic no matter what"
The real joke that you still haven't addressed is that even Bush admits that there were no connections between Saddam and AQ. Tell us how that one rolls?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom