- Joined
- Dec 23, 2009
- Messages
- 16,881
- Reaction score
- 2,980
- Location
- virginia
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Private
Saying Jesus started Christianity is like saying Abe Lincoln was born in a log cabin he made with his bare hands.
The answer to the question is obvious to me. Jesus would not kill anybody. He could have destroyed those who crucified him according to some believers. If you really believe in Jesus how could you even consider him killing anybody?
To me this book points out the hypocrisy oif some people, who believe in war, other than self defense.
The answer is obvious to me too. Jesus wouldn't kill anybody. He didn't kill anybody and, in fact, stopped the violence in the Garden of Gethsemane.
I can't understand this attempt at analogy.
Stating is not the same as explaining. How can we debate something if you don't explain your point of view? What "narrow minded scope" did you object to in the lecture?
And I'm sure some would love to see it happen.Sovereignty is becoming a thing of the past with globalization.
No one said he was unamerican, I said it was a tasteless jab.It seems like whenever someone critisizes anything about the US he is branded as unamerican.
In fact, there is a strong correlation between the external brutality and immorality of a community or nation and its level of perceived enlightenment
But many Christians support death penalty or war under certain circumstances. Why is that? Are they simply not consistent?
That's true. But it's all in the Old Testament. Someone in this thread claimed the New Testament does not condone killing, and Christians are no longer obliged to the old law.
All tyrants and fascist empires and dictatorships claim allegiance to God.
Not being enlightened is a good thing? Are you claiming that the Iranian regime is more moral and than US democracy?
Sorry I asked.
The only thing you should be sorry about are the war crimes and atrocities of your beloved US of A
crimes that are going on as we speak
I want to invade and nationbuild Iran. You'll have to take the above nonsense elsewhere.
As long as it's you on your own, I have no problem with this. In fact send me your paypal account and I'll contribute to your IranAir ticket. :mrgreen:
I'll keep a close eye on YouTube for the swinging eco vid.
You can save the childish BS for someone else.
you've no possible chance of doing so successfully.
Yeah, we've all heard about your service history.
Don't be such a drama queen, eco. You know perfectly well I don't wish you dead. I did think your suggestion was foolish, but I was making fun of it, not saying I really want to see you swing. C'mon ffs.Your response to me was also scummy because it implied you want me dead.
On the contrary, it appears you seem to think that because of your service we should give more credence to your neo-con take on foreign policy.Only because so many people bust out the "then you do it personally" anytime they don't like an opinion, as if that somehow invalidates the opinion. Of course, when I say that I have walked the talk, they usually just get snippy and personal and make snide derogatory remarks.
On the contrary, it appears you seem to think that because of your service we should give more credence to your neo-con take on foreign policy.
I guess it's pointless to ask you to link to where I have denigrated your service twice this month because a) I haven't, ever in fact and b) you're quite bad at backing up your rhetoric with evidence.I don't bring up my service until someone busts that lame slimy BS out. Surprisingly enough, it's the same few people who always run for that angle whenever their opinion lacks luster. How many times have you done so yourself? I count at least twice this month, to me.
The only way I could condone killing is in self defense.
I guess it's pointless to ask you to link to where I have denigrated your service twice this month because a) I haven't, ever in fact and b) you're quite bad at backing up your rhetoric with evidence.
How about to protect someone else?
I want to invade and nationbuild Iran. You'll have to take the above nonsense elsewhere.
Did you ask the people of Iran?
What about Saudi Arabia?
Iran takes care of Palestine, Lebanon and Syria as well.
After that? I'm not sure. I figure the last countries to get free will be China, Pakistan and North Korea. You might notice a common trait among those. In the case of China, th best we can do is nudge them along diplomatically and (probably more impactfully) economically; that's probably 2-4 generations. Pakistan I don't really have an idea; it's not resourceful enough for easy nationbuilding, and it doesn't have the infrastructure for such compared to Iraq and Iran. North Korea I have no idea either; what can we do there, they have no resources and have lived in total intellectual darkness for generations - that's not easily buildable.
But Iran? It still has an educated opposition (unlike Iraq, where Saddam killed everything that didn't yes-man him). There are still businessmen, professors, grad students and even minor officials that are free critical thinkers. Iran has social capital, but for how long? How long until the Iranian regime Saddams all of the opposition? Probably, as soon as they get nukes and no one can do anything.
I'd like to add, regarding the priorities:
There's a reason that SA is not on the top of our list. It works with the US against terrorists, it is not pursuing the bomb, it is not in violation of numerous UN stuff, it doesn't deny the Halocaust and it doesn't chant 'Death to America' in parliament. There are other reasons. I would guess that, presuming they continue to fight terrorism and play diplomatic and economic ball, they will be nudged along in the same manner as China; though, I expect China will maintain near-totalitarian State power longer than SA does.
They told me to take this position.
Explained:
Interesting how you choose the nations you want to invade and the people you wish to slaughter (without their consent of course)
ecofarm's true colours are starting to bleach out
Sounds like you take your orders from Zio fascists - there is a distinct pattern in your racist mutterings
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?