• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who opposed Bush's tax cuts for the rich?

PzKfW IVe said:
Originally Posted by liblady
uh-oh. wrong again. get used to it.
Click to expand...
:lol:
Really? So...
Clinton won in 1992 because the economy -was- terrible?
Clinton did -not- lie when he claimed that the economy was "the worst in 50 years"?
:lol:
Click to expand...
Hello darkness, my old friend...
 
Moderator's Warning:
You two knock it off
 
Grim17 said:
Excellent point Pete!

Considering those 2% contribute 40% of all the income taxes that the government collects, but only got 15% of the cuts, I'd say they got ripped off... big time... While the folks who chipped in the other 60% of the taxes, got 85% of the cuts and made out like bandits...

Great post Pete!
Click to expand...

Considering those fund managers who make $billions/year and put our economy in jeopardy, I would say they are ripping off the American people. Those folks on Wall Street and the banksters are responsible for the financial meltdown.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom