• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Who needs regulations says the GOP?

You really put a lot of effort into creating this thread. It's a lot to take in. I'll have to get back to you when I've had a chance to delve deeper into all of the information you've presented here.
 
And I'll carry my pistol and think it was the wild West.
 

Who needs regulations says the GOP​


Wealthy conservatives want just enough regulations to protect their own "self-interests" - but not enough to benefit anyone else!
Got an example?
 
Got an example?

Interview with Lee Atwater, senior GOP political strategist and campaign advisor for Ronald Reagan:

Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [Reagan] doesn't have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964 [...] and that's fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster…

Questioner: But the fact is, isn't it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps?

Atwater: Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."
 
Interview with Lee Atwater, senior GOP political strategist and campaign advisor for Ronald Reagan:

Atwater: As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry Dent and others put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have been a central part of keeping the South. Now [Reagan] doesn't have to do that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964 [...] and that's fiscal conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole cluster…

Questioner: But the fact is, isn't it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal services, by cutting down on food stamps?

Atwater: Y'all don't quote me on this. You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than "Nigger, nigger."
How about this century?
 
This is a written medium. If you're unwilling to read, then you're not actually here
Right. I'm here to read and respond to statements written by people like you.

Tell me what you know and understand and think.

You haven't read the article you sent me.

Don't tell me you have read it. Prove it buy making interesting statements about it.

I'll wait.
 
Right. I'm here to read and respond to statements written by people like you.

Tell me what you know and understand and think.

You haven't read the article you sent me.

Don't tell me you have read it. Prove it buy making interesting statements about it.

I'll wait.

It says there is an unquestionable stench of racism, fear, and hate everywhere Trump goes.
 
Trump haters say that things he does is hurting people but never give a concrete, true example.

Can you?

Trump is like a mob boss, he doesn’t directly attack his perceived enemies. Instead he supports those that oppose his enemies via dog whistle messages.

Good people on both sides.

John Gotti also had supporters but that didn’t change who he was.
 
Trump haters say that things he does is hurting people but never give a concrete, true example.

Can you?


Trump supporters are just starting to find out.
















1738985529572.png
 
Trump is like a mob boss, he doesn’t directly attack his perceived enemies. Instead he supports those that oppose his enemies via dog whistle messages.

Good people on both sides.

John Gotti also had supporters but that didn’t change who he was.
"Good people on both sides." Is a fabricated lie.
If you would do just a little of your own research, you wouldn't be so brutally ignorant.
 
Trump supporters are just starting to find out.
















View attachment 67555044

You didn't present a single thing that has actually occurred.
 
"Good people on both sides." Is a fabricated lie.
If you would do just a little of your own research, you wouldn't be so brutally ignorant.
Got under your skin, huh? That’s so funny.
 
Cough…..2008…..cough…..derivatives……cough
Oh big deal, we the taxpayers had to pay them for causing America so much pain. Trump has promised America more pain. So much for lower prices.
 
Back
Top Bottom