But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name.
here's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name.
Yeah lie about the black chick. Is she even seated yet? What a dumb ****ing thread.Hardly anybody in the entire US Supreme Court apparatus has access to the deliberation documents. Each justice on the court has 4 clerks, who share access with the justice themselves.
But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name. She's never even published any actual judicial philosophy or opinions.
Her entire deposition in front of the Senate committee during her nomination process consisted of saying "I don't know" again and again and again.
When she was asked what a woman is, she likewise responded "I don't know" on that too.
Without any published history of judicial thought on her part, I was wondering what her opinions would be on this RoeV.Wade issue.
What important arguments would be put forth by this person who's never had any record at all on putting forth significant arguments.
Is she even capable of putting forth arguments?
But maybe she's there in that institution to express her opinions in a different way -- the only way she knows how -- by sharing the private contents of the deliberation among the justices with the outside world.
Strange things have now started happening ever since the N00b arrived. Documents have been leaked -- the kind of documents that are very private and under lock and key.
This is the first time the United States Supreme Court has ever had such a scandal like this. It's the first time things have fallen to this new low.
I'm wondering whether the N00b was the one who leaked the RoeV.Wade deliberations, and whether she'll be found out over it.
That's a lot of ignorance. A whole lot. Written like a truly bored person would.Hardly anybody in the entire US Supreme Court apparatus has access to the deliberation documents. Each justice on the court has 4 clerks, who share access with the justice themselves.
But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name. She's never even published any actual judicial philosophy or opinions.
Her entire deposition in front of the Senate committee during her nomination process consisted of saying "I don't know" again and again and again.
When she was asked what a woman is, she likewise responded "I don't know" on that too.
Without any published history of judicial thought on her part, I was wondering what her opinions would be on this RoeV.Wade issue.
What important arguments would be put forth by this person who's never had any record at all on putting forth significant arguments.
Is she even capable of putting forth arguments?
But maybe she's there in that institution to express her opinions in a different way -- the only way she knows how -- by sharing the private contents of the deliberation among the justices with the outside world.
Strange things have now started happening ever since the N00b arrived. Documents have been leaked -- the kind of documents that are very private and under lock and key.
This is the first time the United States Supreme Court has ever had such a scandal like this. It's the first time things have fallen to this new low.
I'm wondering whether the N00b was the one who leaked the RoeV.Wade deliberations, and whether she'll be found out over it.
Well, you conservatives certainly have imaginations, I'll give you that. Maybe you should write young adult novels and stay out of politics.Hardly anybody in the entire US Supreme Court apparatus has access to the deliberation documents. Each justice on the court has 4 clerks, who share access with the justice themselves.
But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name. She's never even published any actual judicial philosophy or opinions.
Her entire deposition in front of the Senate committee during her nomination process consisted of saying "I don't know" again and again and again.
When she was asked what a woman is, she likewise responded "I don't know" on that too.
Without any published history of judicial thought on her part, I was wondering what her opinions would be on this RoeV.Wade issue.
What important arguments would be put forth by this person who's never had any record at all on putting forth significant arguments.
Is she even capable of putting forth arguments?
But maybe she's there in that institution to express her opinions in a different way -- the only way she knows how -- by sharing the private contents of the deliberation among the justices with the outside world.
Strange things have now started happening ever since the N00b arrived. Documents have been leaked -- the kind of documents that are very private and under lock and key.
This is the first time the United States Supreme Court has ever had such a scandal like this. It's the first time things have fallen to this new low.
I'm wondering whether the N00b was the one who leaked the RoeV.Wade deliberations, and whether she'll be found out over it.
Well, you conservatives certainly have imaginations, I'll give you that. Maybe you should write young adult novels and stay out of politics.
Embarrassingly stupid and dishonest.Hardly anybody in the entire US Supreme Court apparatus has access to the deliberation documents. Each justice on the court has 4 clerks, who share access with the justice themselves.
But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name. She's never even published any actual judicial philosophy or opinions.
Her entire deposition in front of the Senate committee during her nomination process consisted of saying "I don't know" again and again and again.
When she was asked what a woman is, she likewise responded "I don't know" on that too.
Without any published history of judicial thought on her part, I was wondering what her opinions would be on this RoeV.Wade issue.
What important arguments would be put forth by this person who's never had any record at all on putting forth significant arguments.
Is she even capable of putting forth arguments?
But maybe she's there in that institution to express her opinions in a different way -- the only way she knows how -- by sharing the private contents of the deliberation among the justices with the outside world.
Strange things have now started happening ever since the N00b arrived. Documents have been leaked -- the kind of documents that are very private and under lock and key.
This is the first time the United States Supreme Court has ever had such a scandal like this. It's the first time things have fallen to this new low.
I'm wondering whether the N00b was the one who leaked the RoeV.Wade deliberations, and whether she'll be found out over it.
Hell, I had to read the other responses to realize you weren't talking about Amy Coney Barrett, the least qualified judge on the Supreme Court according to the American Bar Association, who rated her unqualified. Still haven't figured out what "N00b" is.Hardly anybody in the entire US Supreme Court apparatus has access to the deliberation documents. Each justice on the court has 4 clerks, who share access with the justice themselves.
But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name. She's never even published any actual judicial philosophy or opinions.
Her entire deposition in front of the Senate committee during her nomination process consisted of saying "I don't know" again and again and again.
When she was asked what a woman is, she likewise responded "I don't know" on that too.
Without any published history of judicial thought on her part, I was wondering what her opinions would be on this RoeV.Wade issue.
What important arguments would be put forth by this person who's never had any record at all on putting forth significant arguments.
Is she even capable of putting forth arguments?
But maybe she's there in that institution to express her opinions in a different way -- the only way she knows how -- by sharing the private contents of the deliberation among the justices with the outside world.
Strange things have now started happening ever since the N00b arrived. Documents have been leaked -- the kind of documents that are very private and under lock and key.
This is the first time the United States Supreme Court has ever had such a scandal like this. It's the first time things have fallen to this new low.
I'm wondering whether the N00b was the one who leaked the RoeV.Wade deliberations, and whether she'll be found out over it.
Hardly anybody in the entire US Supreme Court apparatus has access to the deliberation documents. Each justice on the court has 4 clerks, who share access with the justice themselves.
But there's been a recent addition to the bench - a political appointee with very few credentials to her name. She's never even published any actual judicial philosophy or opinions.
Her entire deposition in front of the Senate committee during her nomination process consisted of saying "I don't know" again and again and again.
When she was asked what a woman is, she likewise responded "I don't know" on that too.
Without any published history of judicial thought on her part, I was wondering what her opinions would be on this RoeV.Wade issue.
What important arguments would be put forth by this person who's never had any record at all on putting forth significant arguments.
Is she even capable of putting forth arguments?
But maybe she's there in that institution to express her opinions in a different way -- the only way she knows how -- by sharing the private contents of the deliberation among the justices with the outside world.
Strange things have now started happening ever since the N00b arrived. Documents have been leaked -- the kind of documents that are very private and under lock and key.
This is the first time the United States Supreme Court has ever had such a scandal like this. It's the first time things have fallen to this new low.
I'm wondering whether the N00b was the one who leaked the RoeV.Wade deliberations, and whether she'll be found out over it.
Seems more likely that it was Ginni Thomas.
Republicans sure had their talking points lined up in a hurry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?