Do you think that outline was intended for illegal immigrants as well?The founding fathers specifically outlined RIGHTS not REGULATIONS in regards to the people.
Does anyone else feel like we're becoming more and more like a nation of rights over a nation of laws? So here's the question: First, and foremost, are we a nation of rights, or are we a nation of laws?
So you're cool with laws being broken until they are made to support the law breakers?The choices don't even make sense. Laws are supposed to be enacted and enforced to preserve rights. They aren't supposed to be mutually exclusive.
We are a nation of laws.
But we should be able to have the freedom to change those laws and not be yoked by mandated laws that are 200 years old.
So you're cool with laws being broken until they are made to support the law breakers?
Do you think that outline was intended for illegal immigrants as well?
Does anyone else feel like we're becoming more and more like a nation of rights over a nation of laws? So here's the question: First, and foremost, are we a nation of rights, or are we a nation of laws?
The Constitution was based for American citizens, therefore anybody that is in the United States illegally is not protected by the Constitution. If they are in the transition period of becoming an American citizen then they should also be protected. But just because somebody is here doesn't mean they are protected.
That is made up nonsense. The constitution applies to all persons within the jurisdiction of the United States. Clauses that apply only to citizens are specifically stated as such.
You are a good example of who we have become. Inventing made up arguments to deny people their fundamental legal rights because you don't like them politically. The funny part is that you probably will act surprised when your own rights are on the chopping block.
Does anyone else feel like we're becoming more and more like a nation of rights over a nation of laws? So here's the question: First, and foremost, are we a nation of rights, or are we a nation of laws?
Right - throw out that pesky Bill of Rights and that nasty COTUS.
Knock yourself out.
Acknowledging that something is not set in stone is hardly the same as calling for complete dismissal.
Isn't it obvious? Where do you stand on the illegal immigrants who already reside in this country? What's your stance on the legal definition of marriage?I don't think so but, then again, I don't have the decoder ring necessary to figure out what you're asking.
Isn't it obvious? Where do you stand on the illegal immigrants who already reside in this country? What's your stance on the legal definition of marriage?
We're both. I think Luther said it well, the purpose of laws is to protect the rights of the citizenry.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?