Who Are the Real Insurrectionists?

[Uncensored2008]

Well, from personal experience alone, every one of them since 2000 featured large scale mail-in ballots.

Nope, you're distorting the truth.

Prior to the release of the biological weapon, mail-in ballots in the majority of states were reserved for absentee voting and military votes.

We started doing it at scale during the Civil War.

False. Military personnel voted by mail.

Oregon has been running mail-in only elections since 1996.

Nope

Yes, you can vote in-person in Oregon. Here’s how

Voters who prefer to cast their ballot in person can do so at their county elections office, including on Election Day.

www.oregonlive.com

However, checks of signatures and addresses occurred. In Georgia, in 2020,

But not in Wisconsin, where the democrat controlled state supreme court ruled they could be ignored.

for example they found a handful of signatures that didn't match - and they tracked down each one of those individuals, and they all confirmed it was their ballot.

I doubt your story, please like to the Young Turks or Raw Story source so I can verify?

Maybe you should stop listening to media sources that tell you things that aren't true, just because they are partisanly convenient?

And stick to CNN and MSNBC?

Sames, but, that is where the Right Wing is today - abandoning Conservatism for "Woke Right Wing"ism and following self-styled Lenninists

So, you know I am but what are you?

What a clever retort.


Like most leftists, you cannot support your positions. The democrat party tells you what you think and you don't question.

 

[Fledermaus]

Nope, you're distorting the truth.

Prior to the release of the biological weapon, mail-in ballots in the majority of states were reserved for absentee voting and military votes.



False. Military personnel voted by mail.


Nope

Yes, you can vote in-person in Oregon. Here’s how

Voters who prefer to cast their ballot in person can do so at their county elections office, including on Election Day.

www.oregonlive.com

But not in Wisconsin, where the democrat controlled state supreme court ruled they could be ignored.



I doubt your story, please like to the Young Turks or Raw Story source so I can verify?



And stick to CNN and MSNBC?



So, you know I am but what are you?

What a clever retort.


Like most leftists, you cannot support your positions. The democrat party tells you what you think and you don't question.

"Military personnel voted by mail"

Aren't those mail-in ballots?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Instead they got pardoned by the orange felon

Don't you hate that? You go through all the trouble of throwing 1,500 political prisoners in the Gulag, and they won't stay lynched?

What kind of world won't let Comrades imprison those who protest against GLORIOUS PEOPLES DEMOCRAT PARTY?

How will you ever defeat fascism if you can't throw anyone who opposes your party in prison?

 

[Fledermaus]

Don't you hate that? You go through all the trouble of throwing 1,500 political prisoners in the Gulag, and they won't stay lynched?

What kind of world won't let Comrades imprison those who protest against GLORIOUS PEOPLES DEMOCRAT PARTY?

How will you ever defeat fascism if you can't throw anyone who opposes your party in prison?

Political prisoners - Stupid label
Gulag - Stupid label
Comrades - Ignorant use it the term

In fact it is a rather stupid post.

People were arrested for breaking into the Capitol, damaging property, assaulting officers, etc.

Not for their politics.

 

[Quag]

Don't you hate that? You go through all the trouble of throwing 1,500 political prisoners in the Gulag, and they won't stay lynched?

What kind of world won't let Comrades imprison those who protest against GLORIOUS PEOPLES DEMOCRAT PARTY?

How will you ever defeat fascism if you can't throw anyone who opposes your party in prison?

Alternative relaity BS from the cult

 

[Uncensored2008]

Alternative relaity BS from the cult

Maybe you could start a YouTube channel to promote your views? Call it "Sieg Heiling with Quag"

 

[Fledermaus]

Maybe you could start a YouTube channel to promote your views? Call it "Sieg Heiling with Quag"

NAZIS.... EVERYONE DRINK!!!

 

[Quag]

Maybe you could start a YouTube channel to promote your views? Call it "Sieg Heiling with Quag"

The stormfront stuff is all MAGA

 

[Uncensored2008]

The stormfront stuff is all MAGA

It was democrats who put 1,500 Americans in a gulag for protesting against them.

It was you crying because the lynching was reversed.

 

[rahl]

It was democrats who put 1,500 Americans in a gulag for protesting against them.

Why don you post such moronic and easily disproven lies? I don’t understand why you insist on embarrassing yourself.

It was you crying because the lynching was reversed.

It’s illegal to break into the Capitol, assault law enforcement, vandalize public property and stop the lawful certification of a free and fair election. It’s why they were arrested, tried and convicted. Every single person who breached the initial crowd barrier should have been shot in the spot.

 

[Quag]

It was democrats who put 1,500 Americans in a gulag for protesting against them.

It was you crying because the lynching was reversed.

Alternative reality BS form the stormfront crowd

 

[Fledermaus]

It was democrats who put 1,500 Americans in a gulag for protesting against them.

It was you crying because the lynching was reversed.

Time to first lie.

First sentence.

People were arrested for breaking into the Capitol, damaging property, assaulting officers, etc.

Not for their politics.

 

[Rich2018]

Alternative reality BS form the stormfront crowd

Next he'll be saying that 200 years ago, the Democratic party supported slavery.

 

[cpwill]

Nope, you're distorting the truth.

Prior to the release of the biological weapon, mail-in ballots in the majority of states were reserved for absentee voting and military votes.

I mean - all voters who mail in are absent from the polling station, so this reads as an attempt to play at semantics. However, you were incorrect that we have not, in our history, done vote-by-mail at scale prior to 2020. If you want to shift to the point that most states had not done as much mail-in voting as they did in 2020 before (with a few notable exceptions), that would absolutely be correct.

However, it is not true that we had not done mail in voting at scale, nor is it true that there was no verification. We know how to vote by mail, and voter fraud is about as rare as voter suppression. Both parties have merely discovered that scaring their base is a great way to boost turnout.

False. Military personnel voted by mail.

That is indeed who it was primarily aimed at during the Civil War, when we first started doing it at scale. Do you think that the military membership of the citizens voting somehow makes it "not mail-in"?

Nope

Yes, you can vote in-person in Oregon. Here’s how

Voters who prefer to cast their ballot in person can do so at their county elections office, including on Election Day.

www.oregonlive.com

Eight states and Washington, D.C., allow all elections to be conducted entirely by mail: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington state.

In Colorado every voter receives a mail-in ballot, sent to the address on their voter registration. You are allowed to vote in person if you make a mistake, damage, or lose your ballot (or have recently moved and don't receive one). Not being banned from turning in a ballot personally is not the same as not being a mail-in system, which they have been since 2013.

Prior to the 2020 election, it was the Left fearmongering this, claiming that Trump was going to have the post office steal the mailboxes After Trump lost - and he lost - Trump and his minions tried to throw a lot of stuff at the wall to see what stuck. That got some of them sued for defamation, and resulted in some sadly hilarious TV meltdowns.... but it was just an exercise in Trump refusing to acknowledge inconvenient reality, and dragging a bunch of right wingers (and some fools, and some cowards) with him.

 

[cpwill]

But not in Wisconsin, where the democrat controlled state supreme court ruled they could be ignored.

I'm not sure what you mean by "they". Wisconsin's Supreme Court did not rule that mail-in-ballots could be ignored, and the State GOP Audit of the election revealed no widespread fraud. They did find precisely four people who may have voted twice in the election and 11 people whose absentee ballots may have been counted, even though they died before Election Day.

I doubt your story, please like to the Young Turks or Raw Story source so I can verify?

...you accuse others of being leftists, but require a the Young Turks to tell you something is true?

And stick to CNN and MSNBC?

No - you should have a varied media diet. Places like this are actually quite useful, because it's easy to get trapped in a bubble, and running into people who are bringing contrary information (that partisan media won't share) helps you avoid falling prey to capture.

But yeah. You should generally not trust sources still trying to tell you the 2020 election was stolen, just as you shouldn't trust sources insisting that the moon landings were faked, that the world is flat, or that we are secretly ruled by shape-shifting Lizard People.

So, you know I am but what are you?

What a clever retort.

Actually that was about how portions of the right are now following self-styled Leninists and other big-government statists. Because they have decided to abandon Conservatism in favor of... well... progressives like the Young Turks. :-/

Like most leftists, you cannot support your positions. The democrat party tells you what you think and you don't question.

Bro, calling me an unquestioning drone of the Democrat party in this place doesn't discredit me. It sorta kinda only discredits you, because it makes you look disconnected :-/

 

[Uncensored2008]

I mean - all voters who mail in are absent from the polling station, so this reads as an attempt to play at semantics. However, you were incorrect that we have not, in our history, done vote-by-mail at scale prior to 2020. If you want to shift to the point that most states had not done as much mail-in voting as they did in 2020 before (with a few notable exceptions), that would absolutely be correct.

ROFL

So is that a talking point you got from Young Turks or some other leftist hate site?

But despite your attempted distortion and dishonesty, the fact is that prior to the release of the Wuhan Designer Virus®, only 21% of all ballots cast were mail-in. This includes states like California and Oregon that had widespread mail-in voting.

Majority of Voters Used Nontraditional Methods to Cast Ballots in 2020

New data from the Current Population Survey’s voting supplement examine voting methods in 2020 and changes from 2016 at the national and state levels.

www.census.gov

However, it is not true that we had not done mail in voting at scale, nor is it true that there was no verification. We know how to vote by mail, and voter fraud is about as rare as voter suppression. Both parties have merely discovered that scaring their base is a great way to boost turnout.

I just proved that it is. You are attempting to rewrite history to serve your party.

That is indeed who it was primarily aimed at during the Civil War, when we first started doing it at scale. Do you think that the military membership of the citizens voting somehow makes it "not mail-in"?

You're squirming.

I stated from the start that mail-in ballots were reserved for the military and those not physically able to get to the polls.

You are desperate to try and cover up for the most corrupt election in history - that was 2020.

Eight states and Washington, D.C., allow all elections to be conducted entirely by mail: California, Colorado, Hawaii, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Vermont and Washington state.

In Colorado every voter receives a mail-in ballot, sent to the address on their voter registration. You are allowed to vote in person if you make a mistake, damage, or lose your ballot (or have recently moved and don't receive one). Not being banned from turning in a ballot personally is not the same as not being a mail-in system, which they have been since 2013.

Prior to the 2020 election, it was the Left fearmongering this, claiming that Trump was going to have the post office steal the mailboxes After Trump lost - and he lost - Trump and his minions tried to throw a lot of stuff at the wall to see what stuck. That got some of them sued for defamation, and resulted in some sadly hilarious TV meltdowns.... but it was just an exercise in Trump refusing to acknowledge inconvenient reality, and dragging a bunch of right wingers (and some fools, and some cowards) with him.

Once again, prior to 2020, only 21% of ballots cast in presidential elections were not at a polling place.

Majority of Voters Used Nontraditional Methods to Cast Ballots in 2020

New data from the Current Population Survey’s voting supplement examine voting methods in 2020 and changes from 2016 at the national and state levels.

www.census.gov

It's amusing, the reason that conservatives oppose universal mail-in voting is because the opportunity for fraud, especially undetectable fraud is vastly higher.

The reason you of the far left push universal mail-in voting is because the opportunity for fraud, especially undetectable fraud is vastly higher.

 

[BabaVoss]

I stated from the start that mail-in ballots were reserved for the military and those not physically able to get to the polls.

Not true.

You are desperate to try and cover up for the most corrupt election in history - that was 2020.

Because trump lost?
Or because there were more mail-in ballots than usual? (We know how to do that.)
Do you have any actual evidence of election corruption?
Because virtually every investigation of such has failed to find any evidence of widespread election corruption.
Because virtually every election official disagrees with your assessment of the 2020 election.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I'm not sure what you mean by "they". Wisconsin's Supreme Court did not rule that mail-in-ballots could be ignored,

No one said they did. What the democrat controlled court ruled was that address verification was not required for mail in ballots.

Your straw man has collapsed.

and the State GOP Audit of the election revealed no widespread fraud. They did find precisely four people who may have voted twice in the election and 11 people whose absentee ballots may have been counted, even though they died before Election Day.

That's nice.

You of the far left have fought any and all cleansing of voter registration rolls, removal of those that moved, or died. That allowed massive proxy voting, filling out votes for these "stale" registrations - which are utterly undetectable. Audit all we want - they will never be found.

...you accuse others of being leftists, but require a the Young Turks to tell you something is true?

Nope, just assuming that and other such sites are the sources you use. Nothing you post would not be said by Rachel Maddow - nothing.

No - you should have a varied media diet. Places like this are actually quite useful, because it's easy to get trapped in a bubble, and running into people who are bringing contrary information (that partisan media won't share) helps you avoid falling prey to capture.

And by "varied" you mean CNN as well as MSNBC, Washington Post as well as NY Times.

But yeah. You should generally not trust sources still trying to tell you the 2020 election was stolen, just as you shouldn't trust sources insisting that the moon landings were faked, that the world is flat, or that we are secretly ruled by shape-shifting Lizard People.

"Stolen" is debatable. 2020 was the most corrupt election in America history. The Covid lockdowns were leveraged by your side to alter and pervert voting procedures, on a massive scale.

In 2023, 11 states passed tough new election integrity laws. In 2024 - you lost.

Coincidence? Not at all. You won't be able to repeat 2020 with these laws in place.

Actually that was about how portions of the right are now following self-styled Leninists and other big-government statists. Because they have decided to abandon Conservatism in favor of... well... progressives like the Young Turks. :-/



Bro, calling me an unquestioning drone of the Democrat party in this place doesn't discredit me. It sorta kinda only discredits you, because it makes you look disconnected :-/

Dude, you're every bit as conservative as AOC, and almost as conservative as Bernie Sanders.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not true.

What isn't true?

Because trump lost?
Or because there were more mail-in ballots than usual? (We know how to do that.)
Do you have any actual evidence of election corruption?
Because virtually every investigation of such has failed to find any evidence of widespread election corruption.
Because virtually every election official disagrees with your assessment of the 2020 election.

Virtually every Social Security inspector disagreed that there was any fraud in the system..

Until DOGE revealed recipients born before 1800 getting checks.

With the 11 states that implemented election integrity laws, you'll never be able to repeat 2020.

 

[Callen]

Until DOGE revealed recipients born before 1800 getting checks.

That is untrue.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Tat is untrue.

ROFL

Ah yes, the drones with their ubiquitous chant of NUHN UHN.

 

[soap box]

No one said they did. What the democrat controlled court ruled was that address verification was not required for mail in ballots.

Your straw man has collapsed.



That's nice.

You of the far left have fought any and all cleansing of voter registration rolls, removal of those that moved, or died. That allowed massive proxy voting, filling out votes for these "stale" registrations - which are utterly undetectable. Audit all we want - they will never be found.



Nope, just assuming that and other such sites are the sources you use. Nothing you post would not be said by Rachel Maddow - nothing.



And by "varied" you mean CNN as well as MSNBC, Washington Post as well as NY Times.



"Stolen" is debatable. 2020 was the most corrupt election in America history. The Covid lockdowns were leveraged by your side to alter and pervert voting procedures, on a massive scale.

In 2023, 11 states passed tough new election integrity laws. In 2024 - you lost.

Coincidence? Not at all. You won't be able to repeat 2020 with these laws in place.



Dude, you're every bit as conservative as AOC, and almost as conservative as Bernie Sanders.

Cpwill posted a link that you should read before you claim that the election was "corrupt".

Everything you've claimed has been debunked by lifelong conservative Republicans.

Lost not Stolen

 

[BabaVoss]

What isn't true?

You claimed that “mail-in ballots were reserved for the military and those not physically able to get to the polls”.

Virtually every Social Security inspector disagreed that there was any fraud in the system..

I doubt that very much, every system is likely to have *some* fraud. The question is about the election in 2020, and there has never been any evidence of widespread fraud. In other words, not enough to change the outcome of the election.

We do elections pretty well in this country.

Until DOGE revealed recipients born before 1800 getting checks.

DOGE has revealed much about their own misunderstanding of existing complex systems. If you looked into it, you’d discover that your claim here is also wrong.

With the 11 states that implemented election integrity laws, you'll never be able to repeat 2020.

Which ones did not have “election integrity” before?

 

[cpwill]

You of the far left...
Nothing you post would not be said by Rachel Maddow - nothing....
The Covid lockdowns were leveraged by your side...
In 2024 - you lost....
Dude, you're every bit as conservative as AOC, and almost as conservative as Bernie Sanders.

I'll get to a more detailed look at your attempts to goalpost-shift later, but.... just to be clear: you do know this makes you look uninformed and disconnected from reality, right?

 

[cpwill]

DOGE revealed recipients born before 1800 getting checks.

This is incorrect both specifically and generally.

Generally, Elon Musk claimed that workers born before 1900 were getting checks.

Specifically, what occurred is that the 20-somethings' working DOGE didn't understand the older code that OASI's support structure was written in. That system applies a date of 1875 when it doesn't have a number - so, for passed-on recipients who didn't have birthdates in the system, it records them as 1875 - 150 years ago. Not a single person who had 1875 assigned was receiving benefits - the system is designed to automatically cut people off at 115, regardless of whether death has been reported. The system simply continues to hold the records of those who have passed - which is why 98% of those who are over 100 in the system no longer receive benefits. They have passed.