• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whitewashing the Black Panthers

calamity

Privileged
Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Monthly Donator
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
160,900
Reaction score
57,849
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Centrist
With all the attention Beyonce is putting on the Black Panthers. There seems to be a concerted effort to downplay the terror group's real activities and influence on today's current problem of rampant Black crime. Here's a pretty good article from this past summer lambasting a PC Liberal film that tries to whitewash the violent organization and cover up the crimes of many of its leaders.

Whitewashing the Black Panthers - The Daily Beast

But as with Ericka Huggins, there is much about Joseph that viewers aren’t told. The most important piece of neglected information is this: When the Panthers were a spent political force, Joseph joined up with the spinoff Black Guerrilla Army and was sentenced to 12½ years in prison for his part in the infamous 1981 Brinks armored car robbery, which resulted in the death of three innocents, including Waverly Brown, the first African-American to serve on the Nyack, New York, police force.

Because the murder of Alex Rackley wasn’t an aberration. And while the Feds undoubtedly abused their power in pursuit of the Panthers, their obsession with violent black nationalism wasn’t irrational. Too bad PBS viewers won’t understand why the “Gestapo pigs,” the shock troops of “fascist Amerikkka,” were so interested in disrupting the revolution Huggins, Seale, Cleaver, and Newton tried so desperately to foment.
 
meanwhile white americans were hanging 9 year old black girls after a good gang raping
 
meanwhile white americans were hanging 9 year old black girls after a good gang raping

Because one group did it to another is never a good reason for another group to be violent and hateful.
By this reasoning, we should basically allow native americans to rape, burn our homes, engage in disease warfare, drive us into camps and murder us because that is what was done to them.
The Germans should all be driven into gas chambers by the Jews as well.

This is what you advocate I suppose.

Forget the fact that the victims of modern crimes are rarely the perpetrators.
 
Because one group did it to another is never a good reason for another group to be violent and hateful.
By this reasoning, we should basically allow native americans to rape, burn our homes, engage in disease warfare, drive us into camps and murder us because that is what was done to them.
The Germans should all be driven into gas chambers by the Jews as well.

This is what you advocate I suppose.

Forget the fact that the victims of modern crimes are rarely the perpetrators.

Wow...you got all that from my op highlighting what the BPP were all about. Interesting.
 
Raleigh police union to vote on boycott of Beyoncé concert in Raleigh | WNCN

https://www.facebook.com/rppa391/
Raleigh Police Protective Association

February 14 at 2:13pm · Raleigh ·

Many of you have heard about the recent controversy regarding the performance of Beyonce at Superbowl 50. Her performance was a showing of support for the extremist Black Panther Party group. The Black Panther Party has a long history of violence towards LEO's going back to its inception in 1966. Its founder, Huey P. Newton, was a suspect in the death of Oakland Police Officer John Frey. He was originally convicted, but the verdict was overturned and a new trial was set which resulted in hung juries. You can read about this history on any reputable site.

The Black Panthers have a history of violent rhetoric toward Police Officers and have a long history of acting on that rhetoric. Beyonce chose to align herself with this extremist hate group while using the protection of the very people the Panthers hate the most. On May 3rd, 2016 Beyonce is slated to perform at Carter-Finley Stadium in Raleigh where she will most likely perform her controversial, anti-police, song "Formation".

During concerts at Carter-Finley, RPD Officers are used in an off-duty, voluntary, capacity to protect patrons and performers. Members are reminded that Off-Duty work is voluntary and hope members decide to conscientiously refuse to work this event.
 
Here are some enlightening pictures from a Black Panther Party Coloring Book for children:

blpan0.webp

blpan8.webp

blpan11.webp

blpan12.webp

If you were raised on such racial hatred propaganda, how could help but have a very hate-filled and twisted view of the world?

-
 
Are you advocating armed insurrection, random violence based on race (against white folks in this instance), and lawless vigilante justice? Sure seems so based on this post and the previous post.

thats alot to get from three words
 
If you were raised on such racial hatred propaganda, how could help but have a very hate-filled and twisted view of the world?

-
thats an interesting question right there.... what do you think the answer is?
 
your seriously asking if i want the ethnic cleansing/genocide of all white people?

I didn't ask you that.

The OP discussed the racist, hateful, anti-police, anti-white, violent, murderous history of the Black Panthers, and your only response to it was :

meanwhile white americans were hanging 9 year old black girls after a good gang raping

As if to justify the actions of the Black Panthers due to what you posted above.

Then, you were asked by Ntharotep:
Because one group did it to another is never a good reason for another group to be violent and hateful.

To which you replied:

sure it is....

Just further justifying the actions of the Black Panthers, to whit I asked you:

Are you advocating armed insurrection, random violence based on race (against white folks in this instance), and lawless vigilante justice? Sure seems so based on this post and the previous post.

Which is what the Black Panthers advocate(d) and you by your own posts were advocating above. So, I thought I would give you chance to do more than submit drive-by posts that do nothing but distract from the OP and allow you to give an extensive explanation of your posts and your opinions, which I would still like to see you do.
 
I didn't ask you that.

The OP discussed the racist, hateful, anti-police, anti-white, violent, murderous history of the Black Panthers, and your only response to it was :



As if to justify the actions of the Black Panthers due to what you posted above.

Then, you were asked by Ntharotep:

To which you replied:



Just further justifying the actions of the Black Panthers, to whit I asked you:



Which is what the Black Panthers advocate(d) and you by your own posts were advocating above. So, I thought I would give you chance to do more than submit drive-by posts that do nothing but distract from the OP and allow you to give an extensive explanation of your posts and your opinions, which I would still like to see you do.

They were called the black panther party for self defense, because white people were murdering them for fun, something every critic of the black panthers seems to be perfectly okay with.
 
They were called the black panther party for self defense, because white people were murdering them for fun, something every critic of the black panthers seems to be perfectly okay with.

Untruthful, hyperbolic, and racist claims by you is still not an answer to my question. It would appear, however, that based on the fact that you are doubling down on your equivocation (even as wrong as it actually is) that you are still attempting to justify the Black Panthers and by use of double talk to refrain from admitting to your real feelings and beliefs.

Be proud of your real feelings. Stand up for what you actually think and believe. Don't cower behind equivocations. Answer the question straight and honest...

"Are you advocating armed insurrection, random violence based on race (against white folks in this instance), and lawless vigilante justice? Sure seems so based on this post and the previous post."
 
Untruthful, hyperbolic, and racist claims by you is still not an answer to my question. It would appear, however, that based on the fact that you are doubling down on your equivocation (even as wrong as it actually is) that you are still attempting to justify the Black Panthers and by use of double talk to refrain from admitting to your real feelings and beliefs.

Be proud of your real feelings. Stand up for what you actually think and believe. Don't cower behind equivocations. Answer the question straight and honest...

"Are you advocating armed insurrection, random violence based on race (against white folks in this instance), and lawless vigilante justice? Sure seems so based on this post and the previous post."

are you saying black people shouldn't be allowed to defend themselves? is that just against white people?
 
thats alot to get from three words

And you didn't answer Beaudreaux's question. I suspect the reason you avoid answering his question is that he was correct in his understanding of your statement.
Are you advocating armed insurrection, random violence based on race (against white folks in this instance), and lawless vigilante justice? Sure seems so based on this post and the previous post.
 
And you didn't answer Beaudreaux's question. I suspect the reason you avoid answering his question is that he was correct in his understanding of your statement.

so you agree black people shouldn't be allowed to defend themselves against white people, is that right?
 
so you agree black people shouldn't be allowed to defend themselves against white people, is that right?

I take it you didn't read the article in the op. The BPP did far more than "defend themselves against white people."
 
I take it you didn't read the article in the op. The BPP did far more than "defend themselves against white people."

yeah they were going to kill all non-black people right? and take control of the whole country, despite being 10% of the population
 
Back
Top Bottom