• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White Supremacy: A growing power?

Skinheads brainwashing, why am i not surprised.

Either way
*Thanks god we have Discrimination laws in UK*
 
When it comes to white. I'm sour cream. Extra supreme.
 
These turds must be ignored.
 
Last edited:
They're an embarrassment to all rational folk, but they're not dangerous on a societal level-- nothing needs to be done about them except to toss a few of them in prison occasionally when they cross the line.

In the five years I've lived in Cheyenne most recently, I got to watch the local branch of the National Alliance dry up and blow away. It was satisfying.
 
They were a big thing around here in the late 80s.
It seems like they do tend to rise up- these white working-class boys- when there's a recession on.
A certain breed of alienated and disenfranchised teens find them appealing.
Around here, though, it was hard to tell the oi skins from the nazi skins, since they all kind of hung out together, which was pretty lame and in retrospect indicates to me that it was more a fashion statement than anything ideological.
 
How prevalent do you think this is? Is it movement getting bigger?

I really couldn't say but it is an interesting question.

Most importantly, since it is in the Freedom of Speech forum, in what capacity do you think the gov't can take on this issue (if any)?

They are exercising their freedom of speech, period. Anytime a child falls under the influence of these buffoons it is a failure of parenting, not society or government.

On a different note, if these morons actually think they will bring about a racial holy war then I say bring it the **** on. It would be my pleasure to put a round in their shiney melons. Better start training a whole lot if you think you're going to take me out.
 
A lot of them hide,in the skinhead movement it is called being a "ghost skin" they blend in with normal white people and most people have no clue about them, so it is hard to say. I think white supremacy is at its lowest ever but still a real threat, I fear a white terrorist attack more then any other.
 
How prevalent do you think this is? Is it movement getting bigger?
While participation in such pathetic organizations may wax and wane based on a variety of social and economic factors, I think that ultimately, they're headed the way of the 8-track, the buggy whip and the flat-earthers. We'll never completely eradicate them from society, they'll just get marginalized into irrelevancy.

Most importantly, since it is in the Freedom of Speech forum, in what capacity do you think the gov't can take on this issue (if any)?
Mom always said that when someone is making an ass of themselves via their speech, please, let them keep speaking. If their hate speech turns to violence against others, "Book 'em, Dan-O."

Regards,
DAR
 
The skinhead movement is and has always been a pathetic joke. They have thankfully been slowly dying off since the 80's and now there are dwindling numbers of them still around the world that are essentially comprised of pseudo punk poser kids waving the flag of and essentially wanking off to a regime that's been dead for decades. I nearly pissed myself laughing when they said on the video that they have to hide out and send coded messages to each other on myspace. They are truly a force to be reckoned with. :roll: :lol:
 
Skinheads brainwashing, why am i not surprised.

Either way
*Thanks god we have Discrimination laws in UK*

They're allowed to be what they are in the UK too laila - it's when their hate speech is actually used against someone else or they hurt someone that they are taken seriously by the law.

I think it's better that they have the freedom to say what they do because then rational people can see them for what they usually are.
 
Fortunately most of them are too stupid to be dangerous.

National Front in Wallonia is led by a retard, that's why they get only 1 or 2% of the votes. The dumbass recently made a joke about the Shoah and had to resign yesterday.

However, the smart ones (those who don't dress like nazi, who don't scream ZIEG HEIL every 10 seconds and don't wear an Adolf-like moustache) can be quite dangerous.
 
A lot of them hide,in the skinhead movement it is called being a "ghost skin" they blend in with normal white people and most people have no clue about them, so it is hard to say. I think white supremacy is at its lowest ever but still a real threat, I fear a white terrorist attack more then any other.

Seriously? When was the last terrorist attack by a white supremacist group? During the 1960s?
 
you guys need to do a little research as to what skinheads are and what they aren't

A skinhead is a member of a subculture that originated among working class youths in the United Kingdom in the 1960s, and then spread to other parts of the world. Named for their close-cropped or shaven heads, the first skinheads were greatly influenced by West Indian (specifically Jamaican) rude boys and British mods, in terms of fashion, music and lifestyle.[1][2] Originally, the skinhead subculture was primarily based on those elements, not politics or race.[2] Since then, however, attitudes toward race and politics have become factors in which some skinheads align themselves. The political spectrum within the skinhead scene ranges from the far right to the far left, although many skinheads are apolitical. Fashion-wise, skinheads range from a clean-cut 1960s mod-influenced style to less-strict punk- and hardcore-influenced styles...

...In the late 1960s, some skinheads (including black skinheads) had engaged in violence against random Pakistanis and other South Asian immigrants (an act known as Paki bashing in common slang).[44][45][9] Although these early skinheads were not part of an organized racist movement, by the early 1970s there were skinheads who aligned themselves with the white nationalist National Front.[citation needed] However, there had also been anti-racist and leftist skinheads from the beginning, especially in areas such as Scotland and northern England...

...Other skinheads countered the neo-Nazi stereotype by forming anti-racist organizations, such as The Minneapolis Baldies, who started in 1986; Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice (SHARP), which was founded in New York City in 1987 and spread to several other countries; and Anti-Racist Action (ARA), which was founded in the late 1980s by members of the Minneapolis Baldies and other activists.[50][51][52] SHARPS are aggressively opposed to neo-Nazism and racism, although they are not always political in terms of other issues.[50] The label SHARP is sometimes used to describe all anti-racist skinheads, even if they aren't members of a SHARP organization.
Redskins and anarchist skinheads are left wing skinheads who take a militant anti-fascist and pro-working class stance. [53] The most well-known skinhead organization in this category is Red and Anarchist Skinheads.[54] In the UK, some anti-fascist skinheads have been involved with Anti-Fascist Action or Red Action.

Right wing skinheads who are conservative and patriotic, but not necessarily extreme or fascist seem to be common in the United States[46][47]...

...A gay skinhead, also known as a gayskin or queerskin, is a gay person who identifies with the skinhead subculture, often (though not necessarily) out of sexual interest. Some gay skinheads have a sexual fetish for skinhead clothing styles, and some have a fetish for violence. Some are attracted to skinheads' outward displays of masculinity. Gay skinheads figure in the work of gay artists such as Canadian painter Attila Richard Lukacs and filmmaker Bruce LaBruce. Gay skinheads have been featured on the catwalks of fashion designers Alexander McQueen and Jean-Paul Gaultier since the early 1990s.
Some skinheads who are gay do not fetishize the skinhead image. These individuals may prefer not to be referred to as gayskins because of the sexual connotations — and they may not associate with self-identified gayskins for the same reason.
 
McVeigh, while white, was not a white supremacist.

The movement he belonged to was strongly associated with Christian Identity, which is both White Supremacist and Dominionist. McVeigh himself was admittedly a White Separatist, which is functionally and ideologically nearly identical to being Supremacist.
 
The movement he belonged to was strongly associated with Christian Identity, which is both White Supremacist and Dominionist. McVeigh himself was admittedly a White Separatist, which is functionally and ideologically nearly identical to being Supremacist.

Except for the fact that he was not a racist and entirely neutral on the race issue. Very right wing and anti-government, but still not a white supremacist.
 
What has made these groups pop up recently are 1. Obama's candidacy and 2. Immigration. For at least the next four years they will crank their propaganda machines in order to show that minorities, homosexuals, and non-Protestants are a threat to American society. I saw a video a few weeks ago by the Coalition of Conservative Citizens showing the racial violence in South Africa and at the end of it it said "Some day whites might be the minority". Will these groups get bigger? Its a good possibility but gaining the political power to actually affect anybody? Probably not.
 
They're allowed to be what they are in the UK too laila - it's when their hate speech is actually used against someone else or they hurt someone that they are taken seriously by the law.

I think it's better that they have the freedom to say what they do because then rational people can see them for what they usually are.

Oh. My mistake then.

Well i have never met one of them so its all good as along as they keep it to themselves.
 
I suspect that white supremacy will grow, but more covertly and will drop the give-away language. In incessant media and Democrat race-guilt campaign likely will result of white supremacy blow-back with a "but what about me" attitude among many whites.

It has a strong blow back effect on me, as at the same time there is daily chastising whites for being racists, the same media, liberals and Democrats are savagely, falsely and grotesquely smearing women, when women are the most discriminated group in the country and have been though out this country's history.

The media also made racism as partisan issue - essentially declaring that Republicans and conservatives are racists and Democrats and liberals are not. Actually, I believe the opposite is more often true. However, since "being black" now is exactly linked to Democrat and liberal, whatever Obama does to many people will define what black people think, do and believe. If that person than intensely disagrees with what Obama does (and doesn't) do, I think it predictable this will be seen in racial terms, given the media defined election as a race question.
 
Back
Top Bottom