• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White privilege

You really aught to stop assuming. I was honestly asking which rules you were talking about.

And you asked again. I like this game. You play stupid and I don't participate but get you to keep asking. Again. :mrgreen:
 
Stay confused. I don't care. You are playing coy.

Or maybe he really doesn't know. I have to admit that I don't know what rules you are talking about either.
 
Or maybe he really doesn't know. I have to admit that I don't know what rules you are talking about either.

My answer to you would be the same.
 

The fact is that black people, as a demographic, were the most rapidly advancing economically group up to and for a short time after the Great Society initiatives of the Johnson Administration. But once progressive ideas and systems kicked in, that changed. Just spending a few hours with the writings of Thomas Sowell, and most people will have a very different perception about 'white privilege' than that presented by the politically correct left. Just one sampling he wrote and an informative commentary on his book:

Race, Politics and Lies - Thomas Sowell

Go to the 6th paragraph down in this one:
https://fee.org/articles/black-rednecks-and-white-liberals/

And McWhorter is brilliant in this essay:
Excerpt describing, IMO, the end result of Affirmative Action:
. . .To be sure, there is, indeed, a distinct White Privilege. Being white does offer a freedom not easily available to others. You can underperform without it being ascribed to your race. And when you excel, no one wonders whether Affirmative Action had anything to do it. Authority figures are likely to be your color, and no one associates people of your color with a propensity to violence. No one expects you to represent your race in a class discussion or anywhere else.

The Privilege of Checking White Privilege - The Daily Beast
 
Or maybe he really doesn't know. I have to admit that I don't know what rules you are talking about either.

Kinda hard to make sure everyone is held to the same rules when people dont know them isnt it?
 
The whole concept of privilege based on race is so comical it hurts. Its ESPECIALLY fun watching rich minorities and whites at Ivy league colleges talking about 'white privilege'. I'm certain the poverty stricken white communities in the Appalachian states will take solace in knowing that while they face the same problems and in greater numbers than inner city black communities, its easier for them because of all that privilege they enjoy.

Privilege is a bi-product of social status and class...not race. Study after study shows that if you graduate from high school and dont have a child out of wedlock (and certainly not while in high school) have a high probability of success regardless of race. Families that work hard and invest in their childrens future of all races absolutely provide them an advantage over those that do not...regardless of race.

'White Privilege' is the whining cry of victim-hood.
 
That isn't a solution for racism. That is a way to cause more divide. Until the rules are the same for everyone things will never change. White privilege is just a buzz term to use as an excuse to ostracize a group of people that are different.

The rules are the same for everyone, you're just one of the whiners that freaks out when someone points out that not every race has the exact same level of opportunity in the US.
 
The rules are the same for everyone, you're just one of the whiners that freaks out when someone points out that not every race has the exact same level of opportunity in the US.

Try competing for a government contract against a certified minority owned business, and then get back to us.
 
Try competing for a government contract against a certified minority owned business, and then get back to us.

Uh huh, so you want priority white access to suckle off the government tit? Why don't you get a real job in the real economy instead of sucking tax payer funds from a government you want to downsize anyway.
 
Uh huh, so you want priority white access to suckle off the government tit? Why don't you get a real job in the real economy instead of sucking tax payer funds from a government you want to downsize anyway.

I have a real job as a small business owner and contribute my fair share back into the economy........ while not bidding on government contracts.

Would you care to expand on why you made these assumptions?

Or would you rather continue on with your ad hominem responses for lack of any real argument?
 

Because I'm tired of hearing you guys' whining about how oppressed you are as a white person in America. No, the system isn't rigged against you. Man up. I can't imagine the hissy fit you guys would have if you actually were oppressed and didn't just have to suffer through equality.
 

You guys.....huh? Just more liberal white guilt on your part.

I simply pointed out that there are incompetence in how the government does business in reference to picking winners and losers.

Explain why minority owned businesses should go to the head of the line over any other competent contractor.

Should we hire contractors based on sex and skin pigment, or by their competence and quality of work?
 

Uh oh, looks like I've triggered you by pointing out that you're not oppressed. Hope I haven't invaded your safe space. I'm so sorry you feel threatened. Maybe some day American whites will rise up and break the chains of their oppressors trying to shackle you with equality.
 

There you again with your nonsense.

I posed a logical question, and you continue throwing out more of your usual garbage.
 
The biggest argument against White Privilege is the success of Asian men, most of whom are recent immigrants.

 



I grew up on the lower east side of NYC (think bowery in the 70's) then Newark, NJ. We were working poor, where was muh privilege? We had no banker. so why would I be lumped in with him and his mysterious racist banker?
 



The Irish Slave Trade ? The Forgotten ?White? Slaves | Global Research - Centre for Research on Globalization

High school student disproves professor?s theory that ?No Irish Need Apply? signs never existed | IrishCentral.com
(liberal kooks recently tried to "whitewash" this from history)

Did Black People Own Slaves?
(free blacks owned black slaves, and even had white indentured servants)



Grouping black folks into "the problem is themselves"..


wait, so you want to group all white people as "privileged" but then you make this comment? How does this work?






Study after study shows that simply having a black sounding name makes it harder to get a job. that's not a problem caused by themselves.

http://www.nber.org/papers/w9873.pdf

"...African American sounding name or a very White sounding name"

What is a white sounding name vs a "african american" sounding name? Seriously?

also:

" Applicants living in better neighborhoods receive more callbacks but, interestingly, this effect does not differ by race."


Doesn't that kill the study?


"We eliminate any ad where applicants are asked to call or appear in person."

Flawed. it's a name not liking study, not a racist one.
 
I grew up on the lower east side of NYC (think bowery in the 70's) then Newark, NJ. We were working poor, where was muh privilege? We had no banker. so why would I be lumped in with him and his mysterious racist banker?

As has been pointed out to you many times before, nobody on any side of the issue has claimed that individuals from either race can't be dirt poor or largely successful.

Yet as Calamity pointed out in post #221 , black households have about half the median income of white or asian households. Must be cause them damn negroes are just lazy right? There couldn't possibly be any socioeconomic reasons.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…