- Joined
- Nov 15, 2009
- Messages
- 13,156
- Reaction score
- 1,038
- Location
- melbourne florida
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
No, I'm afraid you continue to not understand how this works. I think it is because you so badly want something here that will not happen. :coffeepap
I think the dispute over gun-control is one of the dumbest political issues around. However, we have much MUCH bigger fish to fry, so I wish Obama would leave this alone for now.
are you suggesting that in the future you would want Obama to try to ban guns?
No you deny the evidence because you can not accept what Obama and Holder did. it is not one of Obama's dept. But at least 3. So you believe Obama was blind to what all 3 were doing.
banning guns. why do people still repeat this absurdity?
I realize you probably dont know the answer but in just about every congress a dem introduces a bill in both houses trying to ban some types of guns.
Clinton did for ten years.
Moderator's Warning: |
Talk about the subject, not the poster... keep it civil... try to post something substantive, not just repetition and "is not/is too" stuff. If there's really nothing more to be said of substance... then maybe enough has been said? Mmmmmkay? |
I would love to see 20 years of murder-rate history of a city that had very relaxed gun laws, and then in a year or two tightened the gun laws very strongly.
do we have ANY examples of this?
banning SOME types of guns, and banning all guns, is very different.
You have not shown they did anything. Seriously, you have not. Not even close. :coffeepap
so if a government were to make Islam illegal that would not be a violation of the first amendment because there are plenty of christian and Jewish temples a Muslim could attend?
what if a government banned the GOP from running television ads criticizing Obama but they allowed the UAW and the NEA to run ads bashing Senator McConnell or Speaker Boehner?
No. I just don't understand the fuss over most gun-control regulations.are you suggesting that in the future you would want Obama to try to ban guns?
Now, you can think, and address the points made, of you can be a mindless partisan and repeat your mantra.
cute blog, written by a nobody.
You have not shown they did anything. Seriously, you have not. Not even close.
We have it has been shown Obama signed the stimulus bill with funding for it in it. Are you saying Obama did not know what was in it when he signed it. If Holder knew nothing about it how did he mention it in a speech?
So you have no answers for the facts in it.
derail noted.
try asking me a question that has SOMETHING to do with gun-control.
So you have no answers for the facts in it.
That in no way means he knew anything specific about the program.
Yes, he signed the stimulus. That in no way means he knew anything specific about the program. one thing does not mean the other.
Read what Holder said. Please, actually read it, mentioning the name of the program, but decribing something different, as he did, suggests he did not have a working knowledge, but had been told something else. For pete's sake, think. Listen. Address the actual points as i have repeatedly doen with both of yours.
No. I just don't understand the fuss over most gun-control regulations.
poor reasoning skills.
So you are saying both Obama and Holder are incompetent? Obama signed a bill funding a program he knew nothing about? That show me these men have no business in the office they hold.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?