please. POINT OUT THE THREAT
do that
show us that there was actually a threat
only then will you have posted anything worthy of reading
I'm just wondering out loud.
I stand by Woodward. You guys elected a incompetent thug, its not Woodwards fault.
And the rest of us are paying for it.
still waiting on you to POINT OUT THE THREAT
Lanny Davis(Washington Times) and Ron Fournier(National Journal) have come
out and stated that they've had run ins with White House personnel as well, on the same basic point.
Why Bob Woodward's Fight With The White House Matters to You - NationalJournal.com
David Jackson of USA Today also wrote an article that stated the same point: "We know more than a few reporters have received similar e-mails from White House officials. Yelling has also been known to happen."
New sequester battle: Woodward vs. White House
If you ask me, it sounds like the White House is full of a bunch of babies that whine and cry when the press doesn't toe the line.
Makes you wonder how many more have received threats that haven't or who aren't willing to come out.Lanny Davis(Washington Times) and Ron Fournier(National Journal) have come out and stated that they've had run ins with White House personnel as well, on the same basic point.
Why Bob Woodward's Fight With The White House Matters to You - NationalJournal.com
David Jackson of USA Today also wrote an article that stated the same point: "We know more than a few reporters have received similar e-mails from White House officials. Yelling has also been known to happen."
and you are still unable to POINT OUT THE THREATLol....you guys are desperate.
I mean behind all of this is still a shrinking economy and a exploding debt.
And a lying President.
Why is the White House calling the media personally to say a story is wrong?
The fact is that Woodward is right and has the facts to back it up. His probable 'regret' is that he will lose access to the White House.
You plan on taking Reuters to task now for possibly mucking up the story?
Except Woodward wasn't threatened by any senior official in any convincing way. Which is pretty much the meat and potatoes of his claim.
no. can you post some link from someone claiming he was?
You do not ever have to apologize to me. You get wound up because you are making your points and you believe them. This is all part of a serious discussion.
Read more: Exclusive: The Woodward, Sperling emails revealed - Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei - POLITICO.com.
Being threatened and feeling threatened are two different things.no one really felt threatened or coerced in anyway.
Being threatened and feeling threatened are two different things.
And when Woodward came down on Nixon and Bush, he was a liar, but now his word is good as gold?
I don't particularly doubt him on any of it. However, it's always funny that when a reporter is putting down "your guy" he's wrong, but when he's putting down "the other guy" he's an oracle of truth.
Would you please translate? I won't pretend I know.
"Quid est quod ipse est". = He is what he is.
Bob Woodward peaked early in life.
He has gone downhill since Watergate.
"Measurable cerebral activity is virtually absent" from his books after Watergate sez Joan Didion
Woodward makes a lot of stuff up.
I take whatever the guy says with several grains of salt.
So. he wasn't jailed or prevented from doing his job by the White House in anyway. Also, in an email exchange, it's pretty clear that although harsh words were spoken, no one really felt threatened or coerced in anyway. In fact, Woodward actually goes on to tell the WH that he understands that heated conversation is just part of the business:
So tell me again how exactly is Obama behaving like a dictator here?
Methinks its just more nonsense, like that Birth Certificate crap, hoisted upon us by the Far Right. No smoke nor fire.
Because false claims should be debunked.
I was certain there was a squid in there somewhere. I took Latin back when it was still a living language, and subsequently noted that it wasn't in wide use in the construction industry anymore. I would note that when one hits a journalistic home run early in one's career, there's always a crowd looking for one every time afterwards, and anything less is a disappointment. Spoiled people, those folks. That in no way diminishes the veracity of his comments regarding the sequester. That Woodward feels threatened is a completely subjective response, but when a senior WH official tells you that you will regret something, he or she generally means it."Quid est quod ipse est". = He is what he is.
Bob Woodward peaked early in life.
He has gone downhill since Watergate.
"Measurable cerebral activity is virtually absent" from his books after Watergate sez Joan Didion
Woodward makes a lot of stuff up.
I take whatever the guy says with several grains of salt.
Is the left actually trying to impune the integrity of Bob Woodward ?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?