• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House going nuclear on Netanyahu

You just don't get it..

Your hero, the man of no error, the perfect human SAID HEW WOULD!

And now you drag up a ****ing corpse.....


How absolutely lame...



And the alternative was a candidate who promised he would initiate full on air strikes and direct war declaration on Iran.

You think *that* would have been a better outcome for the USA?

Wow.
 
When does anyone on the right ever talk about anyone or anything else?

They couldn't beat him and they can't stop talking about him. :roll:




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.



Maybe when the thin skinned moron stop talking about himself and throwing mean little temper tantrums..

FFS, you champion this lying douche bag as the greatest thing since Metamucil, claim near god like status, infallibility amid miles of broken promises, miles of misery and lies and expect the people he's called "enemies" to stay silent?

You damn right people are talking and complaining, and not just the "right".....anytime I want to start a riot I need float into Bellingham with a sign "Obama is god" and there will be blood.

Face it, he is becoming a very hated president.
 
And the alternative was a candidate who promised he would initiate full on air strikes and direct war declaration on Iran.

You think *that* would have been a better outcome for the USA?

Wow.

If that prevents Iran from getting nukes --- I don't think I'd be opposed to such an action. Who does it whether it's the US or Israel and where negotiations are with regards to a diplomatic try would also enter into the equation. It's cute how you make it so black and white but geopolitics rarely are...
 
That would be the fault of the terrorists that hide behind children. But hey, its easy for you to criticize from the US.
At least we get to see your true colors, though.

the terrorists surreptitiously infiltrated white phosphorus rounds (banned by geneva convention) into the IDF's weaponry ?


my true colors are both sides in this "fight" have committed atrocious war crimes/terror. neither has a moral high ground.
 
You mean Palestinian children? Just curious which children exactly you were referring to. Obviously you dont give much of a **** about the Jewish people or children subjected to the DAILY barrage of rocket attacks by Palestinian terrorists.

Lets see...cares about 'victims' of retaliation...ignores victims of daily aggressions. I wonder why that might be...



Nice!
 
Maybe when the thin skinned moron stop talking about himself and throwing mean little temper tantrums..

FFS, you champion this lying douche bag as the greatest thing since Metamucil, claim near god like status, infallibility amid miles of broken promises, miles of misery and lies and expect the people he's called "enemies" to stay silent?

You damn right people are talking and complaining, and not just the "right".....anytime I want to start a riot I need float into Bellingham with a sign "Obama is god" and there will be blood.

Face it, he is becoming a very hated president.

Does that give the political opposition carte Blanche to do everything in their power to undermine his policies.
 
my true colors are both sides in this "fight" have committed atrocious war crimes/terror. neither has a moral high ground.

Fights are always dirty - welcome to the real world.
 
You mean Palestinian children? Just curious which children exactly you were referring to. Obviously you dont give much of a **** about the Jewish people or children subjected to the DAILY barrage of rocket attacks by Palestinian terrorists.

Lets see...cares about 'victims' of retaliation...ignores victims of daily aggressions. I wonder why that might be...


makes up position about poster's views.

the comment I referred to was that he is a "war hero"-- he has been in charge while his country violates the geneva convention.


It is wellllllllllll known that palestinians target children indiscriminantly, and if the topic were about that I'd gladly comment how reprehensible it was.
some people (even today) don't know about Israel/WhitePhosphorus, and I was simply pointing that out.

Get over your BS.
 
makes up position about poster's views.

the comment I referred to was that he is a "war hero"-- he has been in charge while his country violates the geneva convention.


It is wellllllllllll known that palestinians target children indiscriminantly, and if the topic were about that I'd gladly comment how reprehensible it was.
some people (even today) don't know about Israel/WhitePhosphorus, and I was simply pointing that out.

Get over your BS.
yes...I suppose children dying by phosphorus is more tragic than children having their throats slashed in their beds. I suppose the occasional retaliatory response is more relevant than the daily acts of aggression. Why bother yourself with the attackers when you can wring your hands over the response.

You know how you stop having people retaliate against you, dont you?

Your selection of 'cause' is very telling.
 
Hes the president of the United States. That alone is going to make him the most discussed person particularly on a political website. Who would you prefer we discuss?




"Better days are coming." ~ But not for today's out of touch, running out of time, GOP.
[/QUOTE]



In no particular order:

Sarah Palin

Michelle Bachmann

Ted Cruz

John McCain

John Beohner

Mitt Romney

Jeb Bush

George Bush [either]

Ronald Reagan

Etc.

It is interesting to note that six years ago THEY wouldn't shut up about him, and now they protest his mention.

How very progressive...
 
the terrorists surreptitiously infiltrated white phosphorus rounds (banned by geneva convention) into the IDF's weaponry ?


my true colors are both sides in this "fight" have committed atrocious war crimes/terror. neither has a moral high ground.

Like I said-equivalence.
 
makes up position about poster's views.

the comment I referred to was that he is a "war hero"-- he has been in charge while his country violates the geneva convention.


It is wellllllllllll known that palestinians target children indiscriminantly, and if the topic were about that I'd gladly comment how reprehensible it was.
some people (even today) don't know about Israel/WhitePhosphorus, and I was simply pointing that out.

Get over your BS.



Please provide documented evidence Palistinians deliberately target children.

Please provide documented evidence Netnhyahu's government has violated any aspect of the Geneva convention..

And then please supply the list of international violations against the US for Gitmo.

And then kindly address the OP.

This straw man **** is getting very annoying.
 
1) Did Boehner say that?
2) I don't think Bush would have been happy about it, no. But just as Obama has a pen and a phone, so does Boehner.

I found no reference to the Boehnor attributed citation either, but, hey, when you got nuthin --.

Payback is hell. Barry states he will use his pen and phone to circumvent Congress. Boehnor does it to circumvent POTUS.

Barry signs a bill requiring 30 day Congressional notice prior to trading prisoners, does it anyway. Boehnor invites Netanyahu without notifying POTUS, now it's no fair.
 
Does that give the political opposition carte Blanche to do everything in their power to undermine his policies.


Yes, incompetence does cause close scrutiny and attack in the political process.

He has failed at every major promise...and THAT is worthy of much debate..

accept it. Six years ago you guys couldn't shut up about how great he was..

Now you protest a close examination of his many failures.
 
I'd say that your defense of a nation that violates the geneva convention is far more telling than the fact I think neither side is in the right.
Oh you dont even know the half of it. I've said all along...if I was in charge of Israel, this problem would have ended in the 1970s. You wouldnt have to worry about retaliation strikes or an independent Palestinian state. But YOU want to keep focusing on this nation that 'violates' the Geneva Convention, yet never preface that condemnation with remarks about Palestinian atrocities. So for all your remarks about seeing both sides, your condemnation of the other side doesnt see the light of day.

I dont think either side is right. I also dont think either side is wrong. I see both peoples perspectives which is why I understand there will never be 'peace' there until 1 side or the other is eliminated. Not killed, necessarily. Just not 'there'.

Netanyahu has demonstrated extraordinary restraint in my opinion.
 
Don't we have enough enemies in the Middle East already.

The United States share a common enemy with Iran: ISIS.

And the US and Israel share a common enemy in the Mideast, Iran.
 
Back
Top Bottom