• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Whistleblower Testimony

Moderate Right

Moderate Right

DP Veteran
Joined
Oct 21, 2015
Messages
55,103
Reaction score
11,200
Location
Kentucky
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
 
Schiff made the name public in a report weeks ago.
Reportedly, he-who-shall-not-be-named has protection.

I don't know what they're bitchin' about.
 
Someone from the left will try to false flag him to blame Trump.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
Click to expand...

The alleged whistleblower....is the accurate term though the only accurate term DonDon understands is NY Building Inspector.
 
There is some degree of honor that trump supporters are still clinging to, however tenuous: they want to destroy the life of the whistleblower so freaking bad, but however much they suspect the truth of his or her identity, they know they can't just destroy that person's life without truly knowing. And so they're trying to goad Congressional Democrats...under the mistaken assumption that they know the WB's identity...into confirming Republicans' suspicions.

So congratulations, Republicans. You still have .001% morality remaining in you.
 
Whistle blower was CIA and worked for this guy. Get it now?

RTS1RQ6N.webp
 
Cardinal said:
There is some degree of honor that trump supporters are still clinging to, however tenuous: they want to destroy the life of the whistleblower so freaking bad, but however much they suspect the truth of his or her identity, they know they can't just destroy that person's life without truly knowing.
Click to expand...

Correct, Republicans wouldn't try and do what Democrats tried to do to Kavanaugh.

And so they're trying to goad Congressional Democrats...under the mistaken assumption that they know the WB's identity...into confirming Republicans' suspicions.
Click to expand...

So you actually think Trump doesn't know who the WB is? :lamo

So congratulations, Republicans. You still have .001% morality remaining in you.
Click to expand...

Which would be 100% more than any Democrat.
 
Condor060 said:
Correct, Republicans wouldn't try and do what Democrats tried to do to Kavanaugh.



So you actually think Trump doesn't know who the WB is? :lamo



Which would be 100% more than any Democrat.
Click to expand...

I think that Trump, like you, is trying as hard as possible to get Schiff to confirm his suspicion, again under the mistaken assumption that he even knows.

It's irresponsible beyond belief to play games with a man's life like that just because they want to destroy his life so much, but that's where Republicans are these days.
 
Trump's defense now hinges on illegally attacking a whistle-blower that is no longer relevant. And some people are going along with it.
 
Cardinal said:
I think that Trump, like you, is trying as hard as possible to get Schiff to confirm his suspicion, again under the mistaken assumption that he even knows.

It's irresponsible beyond belief to play games with a man's life like that just because they want to destroy his life so much, but that's where Republicans are these days.
Click to expand...

Just who are these political individuals who Republicans have destroyed their lives in the past that gives you any right to think this is what the agenda is with the WB?

That will have to be some huge life destroying after what was attempted with Kavanaugh.
 
Condor060 said:
Just who are these political individuals who Republicans have destroyed their lives in the past that gives you any right to think this is what the agenda is with the WB?
Click to expand...

Ciaramella, for one. Every time Trump rants about him, he has to be driven to and from work with armed security. And the poor dude might not even be the whistleblower to begin with (not that there would be anything wrong with it if he was). Of course you won't care, because that requires empathy.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
Click to expand...

Or the name tweeted is not the whistleblower and now put a person in a bad spot.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
Click to expand...

How exactly did this person get the title "whistleblower" rather than leaker? Does not seem to fit the lofty title Schiff has given him.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
Click to expand...

His act in naming the whistleblower is a disgraceful abuse of power. Whether he got the name right or not is irrelevant.
 
j brown's body said:
His act in naming the whistleblower is a disgraceful abuse of power. Whether he got the name right or not is irrelevant.
Click to expand...

Doesn't it mean anything to anybody on the right that what Trump did was wrong? Egregiously wrong.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
Click to expand...

His identity and safety are still an issue, which is why the president of all people should not reveal such a person’s identity. This should be another impeachable offense. If the man he named, gets hurt if attacked, the president most definitely has some blame.
 
So what he named your fake victim, I would like to have this person which is probably be a doll because you people are trying to be secret. You know I hate to mention it and for the females who have been through this I’m sorry but victims are face the guys who rape them but, this coward is a little (*****) because he is scared? If you have something to say come out like a honorable man and let’s go don’t hide behind daddy schiff because you are scared! I bet you that he wasn’t in the same exact room when this call happened


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Cardinal said:
There is some degree of honor that trump supporters are still clinging to, however tenuous: they want to destroy the life of the whistleblower so freaking bad, but however much they suspect the truth of his or her identity, they know they can't just destroy that person's life without truly knowing. And so they're trying to goad Congressional Democrats...under the mistaken assumption that they know the WB's identity...into confirming Republicans' suspicions.

So congratulations, Republicans. You still have .001% morality remaining in you.
Click to expand...


Absolutely ridiculous....just simply have the wb testify in secret....easy cheesy. I could care less of the name, but his testimony and answers to questions under oath.
 
Moderate Right said:
Well, Trump has been attacked for naming the whistleblower. How can Trump know the name of the whistleblower? The Dems have kept it secret for purposes of protection. That's their argument for the whistleblower not testifying. So, Trump can't possibly know the name of the whistleblower. But, if Dems attack Trump for tweeting the name, then apparently the whistleblower's name is not secret and if the whistleblower is not secret anymore then the whistleblower should testify. If job protection is no longer an issue because this person is not secret anymore then that person should be compelled to testify.
Click to expand...

I can not find anything that states that anyone really knows who the whistleblower is at this point. Everyone says that this or that person is the whistleblower, but is anyone really sure? I do know that the people who have been mentioned have had to have security details assigned to them due to the threats against their lifes.
 
Cardinal said:
Ciaramella, for one. Every time Trump rants about him, he has to be driven to and from work with armed security. And the poor dude might not even be the whistleblower to begin with (not that there would be anything wrong with it if he was). Of course you won't care, because that requires empathy.
Click to expand...

Bulls**t.
 
Condor060 said:
Bulls**t.
Click to expand...

Nope.

The CIA analyst who sparked the impeachment investigation is being protected by armed security officers.

The analyst, whose identity has not been confirmed, continues to work on issues relating to Russia and Ukraine and is driven to and from work by the armed officers when threats against him increase, the Washington Post reported. The threats tend to increase when President Trump tweets about the whistleblower.
Click to expand...

Ukraine whistleblower driven to work by armed security officers when Trump tweets about him

Of course, you'll reject the news source since it isn't convenient to...whatever it is you want to believe.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom