Navy Pride
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 39,883
- Reaction score
- 3,070
- Location
- Pacific NW
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Your comments
During my workout this morning I was watching the news.
FoxNews was talking about what the candidates were doing before Tuesday. They spent about 30 seconds on Romney (with video), 15 seconds on McCain's wife (with video) and as the segment was transitioning to the next they voice-overred "Obama is also in that state (same state as McCain's wife)". They never mentioned Clinton.
A 10-15 minutes later I switched to NBC and anytime the candidates were broad casted as a collective the democrats were always mentioned/listed/pictured first.
Just from some personal experience in the last day or so it seems all are guilty of bias at times.
American news seem to have a problem with its idea of what objective is in general.Objective isnt presenting both sides of an arguement as if both are objectivly equal thats just lazy.Thats what annoys me most about the whole fair and balanced slogan.It seems to imply if they are talking about people who believe in fairies they will present with equal say from both sides of the debate and leave you to decide.This may not seem like a big ask but what if they are reporting on something you really have little knowledge about?
I think CNN is generally seen as the gold standard for American news over in the UK kinda like the BBC is here.Though there is a liberal bias to the BBC.
MSNBC has that complete **** on it Keith Olbermann i cannot stand him.His botox filled robot face spitting out a bunch of ad hominem attacks as if he is on somekind of pedestel of dignity.
As far as I can tell they only have 2 pundits that are Conservatives on any regular basis......Carlson and Buchanan and Carlson is the only one with a program...............Scarborough use to be Conservative but he has sold out to the network to keep his job.........
Do you ever watch Hannity and Colmes? First Colmes is at most a moderate. Second, Colmes get about 1/4 the air time as Hannity and when Colmes does speak it's usually from the background (not in view of the camera) and it is rarely acknowledged he is speaking. On that same not I haven't heard Colmes ever really say anything substantial so maybe there is a reason for him being ignored.
Hannity and Colmes reminds me of The News show on Family Guy. Hannity would be male anchor, the guest would be the female anchor, and Colmes is the Ollie the weather man.
YouTube - family guy the best of ollie williams weatherman
The same still applies, all networks are guilty of bias.
Check out Holmes on wikpedia.......They have a different opinion..........Colmes problem is 90% of the time he has to take the ridiculous side..........They will have a topic to debate and I will say to myself no one can disagree with that, no one can be on the other side.......Well Colmes never fails...........he is.............
All of faux news is bs and comprised of morons that simply shout louder than any other presenter on any other channel - sadly there is a audience that likes to listen to this sort of shout out.Because it's his job. He also usually takes the fanatic path along with poor articulation which makes the opposing opinion look ridiculous.
My wife is as liberal as they come and I know she thinks Colmes is a moron.
All of faux news is bs and comprised of morons that simply shout louder than any other presenter on any other channel - sadly there is a audience that likes to listen to this sort of shout out.