davidtaylorjr
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 30, 2013
- Messages
- 6,775
- Reaction score
- 1,123
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Conservative
Misreadings and translation errors on your part. Sorry. I've linked those for you before.
That does not = homosexuality is not a sin. It also doesn't mean to accept sin. It also does not mean to not say what sin is. It does mean hate the sin, not the sinner.
It is not a translation error, many many MANY scholars, in fact a majority of Biblical scholars take my position on those. The ones that don't are the ones that A. either are not believers and are doing secular scholarship, or B. have an agenda to prove.
No, but homosexuality fits that decree better than torture.
And I've also told you to get a good definition of sin. Sin doesn't equal immoral.
according to the bible homosexuality in itself is not sin in this fact has been proven repeatedly
Not really, as one explained to me, it's easier to keep with that reading than rewrite tradition for everyone.
Did I say sin = immoral?
We were talking about morality, and then you threw in sin. Wanted to make sure you knew the difference.
mor·al
/ˈmôrəl/Adjective
Concerned with the principles of right and wrong behavior and the goodness or badness of human character.
Wrong.
Romans 1
1 Cor. 6
1 Tim. 1
Right.... That's funny. :roll:
nothing in there says homosexuality itself is a sin, you lose to facts again. even the pope disagress with you because he is educated enough on this topic to understand it
8 Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, 9 understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just but for the lawless and disobedient, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who strike their fathers and mothers, for murderers, 10 the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound[c] doctrine, 11 in accordance with the gospel of the glory of the blessed God with which I have been entrusted.
Though I do believe all sin is immoral based on the definition of moral.
And true. As is the poor Amish follow who asked his congregation not to be mad at him because he could prove the Bible against homosexuality. There's more than a few books on this at your public library. They are more complete than links you can find on the Internet. I encourage you to visit and investigate.
1.)The Pope....
2.)I'm not Catholic....
3.) That being said, Why would those who practice homosexuality not enter heaven? Because it is sin.
4.) Here is what 1 Timothy says:
according to the bible homosexuality in itself is not sin in this fact has been proven repeatedly
Pretty clear that it is sin.
The Pope....I'm not Catholic....
That being said, Why would those who practice homosexuality not enter heaven? Because it is sin.
Here is what 1 Timothy says:
Pretty clear that it is sin.
1.) yes the pope
2.) never said you were
3.) "practice" who said practice? there you go again being dishonest and making stuff up
4.) thank you for posting this and proving that Timothy never says homosexuality itself is sin, your own post proves my statment true, thanks
5.) only if you are dishonest and ignore facts, it actually proves my statement true, i post it again
Let me preface by saying if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck it's a duck. To me, all this judgement of others because they "sin," in a manner that differs from the way you "sin," is poppycock to begin with.
But in the spirit of the thread I will play along.....
All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God. Why would any other sinner be allowed into the gates of heaven and homosexuals be banned?
Please explain to me your interpretation of Romans 10:9.
1.)The passage said practice actually.
2.) What do you think Timothy was talking about? Sin
3.) you should probably brush up on your reading skills for that.
4.)I didn't ignore facts,
5.)you apparently can't read.
Or I can just study the original languages and context myself thanks.
1.) yes it did, thank you for acknowledging that fact that the passage did and my statement did not.
its this fact that proves you wrong and my statement to be true.
2.) you already told me and the passage already said what he was talking about "practice" which is exactly why my statement is a fact
3.) instead of being uncivil and trying failed insults that further expose your dishonesty and lack of education on this matter you should brush up on English.
4.) yes you did, YOU just proved it, you referred to something i never said
5.) again you just proved the fact that i can and you cant
thanks, you lose to facts again
lets reflect:
according to the bible homosexuality in itself is not sin in this fact has been proven repeatedly
let us know when this fact changes, if you disagree by all means FACTUALLY prove otherwise
1.)How, according to the Bible is it NOT sin? Do answer that one
2.) I have shown you the verses that shows that it is
3.), you claim that it is not
4.) therefore BOP is on you.
I support waterboarding. It's a wonderful tactic to extract critical information. It's just too bad the dope smoking peaceniks were allowed to screw everything up. Does anyone else believe liberals are freedom hating Communists?Yes it is. And I sat here and listened to self professed conservatives give their unequivocal support for it. They forget their principles and morals when convenient.
1.) easy because the bibles says the acts are a sin, something your dishonesty or ignoorance of this subject seems to not allow you to understand.
2.) nope you showed me verses that say the act is a sin
3.) 100% wrong, :i: dont claim anything, im pointing out facts that your verse support and prove
4.) there no burden of proof, your verses and you already took care of that for me
YOU pointed out that i never said practice when i asked you and YOU posted verses that YOU admitted DO referre to PRACTICE
you lose gain to facts, thanks for further proving it
lets reflect:
according to the bible homosexuality in itself is not sin in this fact has been proven repeatedly
let us know when this fact changes, if you disagree by all means FACTUALLY prove otherwise
I support waterboarding. It's a wonderful tactic to extract critical information. It's just too bad the dope smoking peaceniks were allowed to screw everything up. Does anyone else believe liberals are freedom hating Communists?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?