Disagree. The labels seems to be working great at the moment. You are absolutely freaking out about it, for example.
Yeah - ignored just like Trump's decades long history of sexual assault, as claimed by no less than 27 women. Even Ivana once claimed rape before retracting it. How much do you think she was paid off for that? I'm guessing many times more money than Trump was known to pay porn stars for their silence. It's just like he told the world back in 2015. Trump couldn't lose your vote if he shot someone in the middle of 5th Avenue.
They must have taken a page out of the MAGA playbook.
Total bullshit. You seem to be going out of your way to seem like a know-nothing. Is that deliberate? Many of those claims go back long before Herr Kaiser Drumpf even threw his pickelhaube in the political ring. Some of the sexual assault claims date back to the 1970s. You had a problem with "the timing of those claims" ?!!? Next you'll tell me that bragging about sexual assault by grabbing women by the ***** is something you've heard in your locker rooms, too. Right?
Your handle and avatar tell us all everything we need to know about you. Stop embarrassing yourself.
notthebee.com
Certainly not for people who don't even believe in our justice system, or rule-of-law.
Since it was invented, every president has used the auto pen to sign documents - INCLUDING TRUMP! If you have some kind of mystical evidence that Biden didn't approve of those pardons, please feel free to share it now. I'm sure we'll all get a chuckle out of your proof to the contrary, just as I'm sure I'll be no less entertained by it than I was when Trump said he magically declassified with his mind all the top secret documents he was caught deliberately hiding at Mar-A-Lago in violation of a court order! I'm sure he wishes he had an auto pen then.
Those are his own words. If you want to defend him, then you must own them too. If you don't own them, then you must condemn him for saying them. What's it gonna be? My guess is you'll continue to stand beside the man who declared his could publicly commit murder with impunity 10 years ago. Prove me wrong.
Your post is pure top-to-bottom bullshit. Trump gave blanket pardons to known criminals who had already plead guilty, or were found guilty by a jury, and were serving time for assaulting police officers at the Capitol on January 6th, some of whom have already been rearrested for other crimes! (see below) Do YOU believe in our justice system and rule of law applies to them? Do YOU believe our laws and justice system applies to Trump? If you do, you've certainly made zero indication of it anywhere on these boards.
HA! My credibility eclipses yours by orders of magnitude. You have no moral high ground over me, because I'm not hear as a mouthpiece for a convicted felon. You must be so proud of that.
You should give some thought to breaking your shackles. The misogynist, racist, tax cheat, money launderer, and lifelong fraud, Donald Trump, is using you. Free yourself.
continued .....
As expected, you have no evidence of a single one of those pardons being performed by anyone else, nor proof that is wasn't the express will of president Biden to do so. FAIL. However diminished by his age, Biden remained in office, operating as POTUS and making decisions right up until Trump's inauguration.
Why the straw man argument? That wasn't the question. Do you or don't you condemn Trump for saying what he said? Yes or no?
And yet the right wing is rife with belief that it is.
A couple of red herrings in this argument.
So you approve of pardoning the crimes performed by those who confessed, and those found guilty by a jury of assault on police, and those with a record previous to January 6th. Again, just as I suspected. The point, which to nobody's surprise, that seems to have sailed right over your head, is that Biden's commutations were for non-violent acts. All of them. Nor had anyone a history of criminal violence, ... unlike Trump's pardons. Once again confirming that you have no problem with violence, even against police, if it is done in the name of your ideology.
More unsubstantiated bullshit. No such thing is occurring anywhere. Juries hand down verdicts and defendants have the right to challenge jurors, just as Trump's high priced attorneys had that right in the E. Jean Carroll case. By definition, a kangaroo court is one where the verdict is a foregone conclusion, which cannot, and does not happen with a jury. The only thing even resembling a kangaroo court in our current system is Trump's control of the Supreme Court, to which he appeals with some confidence every time he loses a lower court - which, as you know, is quite often.
... which, in retrospect, has turned out to be true
A tempest in a hard drive. There is no "there" there, and never was.
What pardons are you referring to?
Now you're talking about Trump.
Please provide specific examples of lies about immigration. I don't seem to recall any.
Which, curiously enough, seems much better than Trump's, even to this day. Or haven't you been paying attention to that? I could give you plenty of examples if I had an entire day to waste on you.
And you have a problem with this?!!? Why? Either all these decisions and alleged lies were Biden's - the man you claim wasn't competent to make them - or they are someone else's - in which case Biden is blameless. You can't have it both ways. Don't be greedy. You only get to pick one way to make a fool of yourself.
??
No - they show the historical record. Look it up. No amount of feeble revisionist history on your part can turn Trump into something he never was.
I've lost nothing. But if you think you've won with Trump, then rejoice! You must be very HAPPY!
