• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Which area of the country is more rat-infested, the border or Baltimore?

Not many. Like I said, democrats have been hugely successful in obstructing investigations into the crime in heavily democrat precincts.

Do democrats want to stop election interferences from outside or illegal sources? Not at all. They claim Russia is interfering with US elections and maybe Russia did, considering the damage the fake lying Russian dossier did to Trump. But do democrats want investigators to root out all election fraud? Absolutely not because if voter fraud was stopped the democrat party would be in serious trouble.

DEMOCRATS ANNOUNCE THEY WILL BLOCK TRUMP'S VOTER FRAUD INVESTIGATION

HTTPS://NEWSPUNCH.COM/DEMOCRATS-BLOCK-TRUMP-VOTER-FRAUD/




What voter fraud has been found to justify further investigation? Why launch a nationwide fraud investigation when there's no indication, after much review, of enough fraud to justify such extensive investigation?
 
That's kind of a weird request considering the only reason we're talking about Cummings and Baltimore is because Trump used it as a distraction tactic away from the wall.

DON'T DISTRACT FROM OUR DISTRACTION TECHNIQUE!

Thats idiotic. Cummins attacked the border issue to distract from his piss-poor handling of his own district. See how easy it is to adopt your moronic argument. The issue of this thread is Baltimore and Cummings. You liberals refuse to address it because you cant. So you deflect.
 
The evidence has been read into the Congressional record for all to see.

A lot of info has been read into the Congressional record. Like Mueller admitting he had no clue who Christopher Steele was or what the fake Russian dossier had to do with Russian collusion conspiracy theories.
 
Show me?

Why do ya think Trump has given up on it?

Trump gave up? What about you? Do you want the government to do what it can to make sure illegals are not voting and that no vote is recorded in any illegal manner whatsoever?
 
What voter fraud has been found to justify further investigation? Why launch a nationwide fraud investigation when there's no indication, after much review, of enough fraud to justify such extensive investigation?

I see problems with you assessment. First, how can anyone know no voter fraud is taking place if no investigation is done because democrats and assorted crooks block any attempts to investigate to find out whether any voter fraud is taking place or not?

Secondly, do you want to see the government take steps to insure no voter fraud can take place, whether it is taking place or not? If not, why not?
 
What voter fraud has been found to justify further investigation? Why launch a nationwide fraud investigation when there's no indication, after much review, of enough fraud to justify such extensive investigation?

Why launch an investigation which is not justified? Good question. Why launch an investigation into phony Trump/Russian collusion conspiracy theories when no evidence of any such collusion has ever been presented from any period of time beginning with the 2015 campaign?
 
Trump gave up? What about you? Do you want the government to do what it can to make sure illegals are not voting and that no vote is recorded in any illegal manner whatsoever?

Do you want the government to do what it can to make sure illegals are not voting and that no vote is recorded in any illegal manner whatsoever?

Did everyone notice "Marke" forgot FED gov? I did

Trump gave up?

Uh yeah.....

It's "disbanded"(LOL)

Maine Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap, who sat on the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity, wrote Friday that a review of documents shows the panel's evidence of voter fraud is "glaringly empty."



Donald Trump's voter fraud claim untrue, election official says
 
Then we have REPUBLICAN controlled state doing what?
Mail in ballots(Rolling eyes)
Oh my.....
Utah election reform law aims to remove barriers to voting, boost turnout | Deseret News

May I assume election corruption and illegal interference and voter fraud can occur in US elections? If so, then why are so many democrats opposed to measures designed by experts to secure our elections from possible fraud? If voter ID is so bad then why did Jimmy Carter recommend it after his involvement in voter fraud investigations during the Bush administration? Are we to assume that blacks are too weak, ignorant or handicapped to help the government secure our elections against fraud?
 
What voter fraud has been found to justify further investigation? Why launch a nationwide fraud investigation when there's no indication, after much review, of enough fraud to justify such extensive investigation?

You're trying to reason with a person who sees a conspiracy everywhere he looks?
 
A lot of info has been read into the Congressional record. Like Mueller admitting he had no clue who Christopher Steele was or what the fake Russian dossier had to do with Russian collusion conspiracy theories.

Hi! Thank you for taking time to comment.

Regards.
 
I see problems with you assessment. First, how can anyone know no voter fraud is taking place if no investigation is done because democrats and assorted crooks block any attempts to investigate to find out whether any voter fraud is taking place or not?

Secondly, do you want to see the government take steps to insure no voter fraud can take place, whether it is taking place or not? If not, why not?

Investigations into allegations of voter fraud were already carried out by Trump's own commission, or did you conveniently forget? The result? See for yourself...

Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud
 
May I assume election corruption and illegal interference and voter fraud can occur in US elections? If so, then why are so many democrats opposed to measures designed by experts to secure our elections from possible fraud? If voter ID is so bad then why did Jimmy Carter recommend it after his involvement in voter fraud investigations during the Bush administration? Are we to assume that blacks are too weak, ignorant or handicapped to help the government secure our elections against fraud?


May I assume election corruption and illegal interference and voter fraud can occur in US elections?


Of course...

Just not in the exaggerated numbers that people like you believe.

Forget all the "soap opera"

Think about it... and I am on your side

If you're an illegal here making money$$$$$$ and sending it back to your country of origin why vote(Family members depend on it)?


So much to risk

They do not need to do it

They're already getting what they want
 
I see problems with you assessment. First, how can anyone know no voter fraud is taking place if no investigation is done because democrats and assorted crooks block any attempts to investigate to find out whether any voter fraud is taking place or not?

Secondly, do you want to see the government take steps to insure no voter fraud can take place, whether it is taking place or not? If not, why not?



“I see problems with you assessment. First, how can anyone know no voter fraud is taking place if no investigation is done”

I see problem in your reading comprehension. Or, you understand but choose to ignore. First, I said “further” investigation. That means there already has been investigation. So, your post assumes there has not been investigation so therefore there must be such extensive investigation as is in question. I asked you what fraud was found from all the investigation that has been done. You can’t answer the question. It sounds more like you’re avoiding the question because you don’t like the answer.

“because democrats and assorted crooks block any attempts to investigate to find out whether any voter fraud is taking place or not?”

I’ve asked what evidence you have of such obstruction. The fact is, many investigation and ongoing review has taken place. Very little fraud has been found in any state. Maybe you have.

“Secondly, do you want to see the government take steps to insure no voter fraud can take place, whether it is taking place or not? If not, why not?”

If fraud is not taking place, after as much investigation as has been and the ongoing review in place, I do not want to have additional steps taken that makes voting one bit more difficult for anyone or that costs money.
 
Before I could answer I would have to ask, marke, where do you live?
 
Investigations into allegations of voter fraud were already carried out by Trump's own commission, or did you conveniently forget? The result? See for yourself...

Report: Trump commission did not find widespread voter fraud

Let's examine the facts. Trump appointed a commission to investigate widespread allegations of voter fraud. The commission ran into stiff opposition from those insisting they had no business investigating voter fraud since, allegedly, no fraud has ever occurred. The commission is than disbanded because of the obstruction of so many public officials opposed to investigating voter fraud. The commission found nothing at all because it conducted no investigation at all due to obstruction.

Did I get it right?

When you say the commission found no voter fraud, are you careful to point out that the commission found nothing at all as to whether voter fraud occurred or not? If not then you are contributing to the general dishonesty of those lying to protect ongoing voter fraud.
 
Why launch an investigation which is not justified? Good question. Why launch an investigation into phony Trump/Russian collusion conspiracy theories when no evidence of any such collusion has ever been presented from any period of time beginning with the 2015 campaign?



Stay on topic and answer the question or it is fact you cannot justify what you assert needs to be done and is thus dismissed as unfounded.
 
Of course...

Just not in the exaggerated numbers that people like you believe.
Forget all the "soap opera"
Think about it... and I am on your side
If you're an illegal here making money$$$$$$ and sending it back to your country of origin why vote(Family members depend on it)?
So much to risk
They do not need to do it
They're already getting what they want

If you admit it is possible for voter fraud to occur then why do you seem opposed to taking measures to insure voter fraud cannot occur?
 
You're trying to reason with a person who sees a conspiracy everywhere he looks?



No. I'm establishing facts that support marke is a debate derelict and has no credibility with such conclusion I can have for near future use for perfunctory purpose.
 
If you admit it is possible for voter fraud to occur then why do you seem opposed to taking measures to insure voter fraud cannot occur?

Again, you just happened to left out that old FED GOV AGAIN.....
 
DJT is right. Cummings needs to get off his lazy ass, put it in gear, and clean up the rat infested cesspool.

First of all, the worst rat infested cesspool is the White House where over 68 people have left or been fired. Among them, confirmed rats like Pruitt, Price, Zinke and Porter. Trump criticizing others when he himself is a rat and has a rat infested house is the ultimate hypocritical statement ever. Then again, what can anyone expect from a rat?

In addition, isn't the President supposed to help the country? Or just criticize it?
 



Oh, please stop. One case in one local city council primary election in one county in upstate NY in 2009. Really? And you want a nationwide, in-depth fraud investigation over this? The following is an excerpt from the article in the link given below:

“The investigation swirls around the primary for Troy city council in 2009.”

Troy, NY Dem voter fraud case advances to Grand Jury

And still no obstruction evidence. Consider yourself refuted and your claims dismissed as unfounded for lack of meeting the burden of proof which is your responsibility. You are simply not a credible debater.
 
Back
Top Bottom