• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Where should Gitmo detainies be sent?

Where should Gitmo detainees be sent?

  • They all should stay in Cuba.

    Votes: 7 41.2%

  • They all should be freed.

    Votes: 2 11.8%

  • They all should be moved to the US and get trials.

    Votes: 8 47.1%

  • Only the ones we cought attacking us should get trials, the rest should be released today.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Total voters
    17
I say we buy the property right next to GW Bush's new residence in Texas & ship them there. If Bush moves, we keep moving the detainees next door to him.
(& change the facility to a minimum security prison where the inmates will all be armed & given a map of Bush's residence & a daily schedule of his activities)
 
Devil505 said:
I say we buy the property right next to GW Bush's new residence in Texas & ship them there. If Bush moves, we keep moving the detainees next door to him.
(& change the facility to a minimum security prison where the inmates will all be armed & given a map of Bush's residence & a daily schedule of his activities)
Click to expand...

Hmmm..you must not agree with some of his work...
 
Looks like there in being an increased effort from the Obama adminstration to persuade the Brits in to taking them.

Britain would consider taking Gitmo detainees - White House- msnbc.com


LONDON - British Justice Secretary Jack Straw said Monday his country would consider taking Guantanamo Bay detainees if the United States asks for such help to close the detention facility.

Before Straw met with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, reporters asked the two officials about the possibility of Britain taking some inmates from Guantanamo.

"We will do our best to help and support the policy of the Obama administration to close Guantanamo Bay," Straw said. "If we're asked, of course we'll consider" accepting detainees, he said.



Anyone think this will actually happen? Do the British people still have a voice to mount any opposition to this or have they been oppressed beyond approach by Big Brother?
 
EulyssElvisCaustic said:
give them what they want....a majic carpet ride to the side of allah....

complete with "virgins in burkas" (if they took the burkas off...you would understand why they are virgins):lol:
Click to expand...

With a pack of C4 on the bottom once they get their.
 
Release each terrorist to the home of mealymouthed leftists.
 
DamnYankee said:
Release each terrorist to the home of mealymouthed leftists.
Click to expand...

Or to lots of psycho rightists like Limbaugh, so we have an excuse to throw them in jail for attacking someone, regardless.
 
repeter said:
Or to lots of psycho rightists like Limbaugh, so we have an excuse to throw them in jail for attacking someone, regardless.
Click to expand...

Leftists are yammering about the terrorist having rights, so why don't you people man up and take in these poor disadvantage terrorists in and give them a home. At least until the have their day in court.
 
DamnYankee said:
Leftists are yammering about the terrorist having rights, so why don't you people man up and take in these poor disadvantage terrorists in and give them a home. At least until the have their day in court.
Click to expand...

All sorts criminals in the U.S. have rights; should we put them in civilian homes? :2razz:


Duke
 
Duke said:
All sorts criminals in the U.S. have rights; should we put them in civilian homes? :2razz:


Duke
Click to expand...

No, DamnYankee is being dumb. We should give them to Sheriff Joe in Arizona.
 
repeter said:
No, DamnYankee is being dumb. We should give them to Sheriff Joe in Arizona.
Click to expand...

That psychopath? Lock him up with the terrorists, says I.


Duke
 
Duke said:
That psychopath? Lock him up with the terrorists, says I.


Duke
Click to expand...

That's not a bad idea, but he might end up killing all the terrorists...until they blow him up. :rofl
 
repeter said:
That's not a bad idea, but he might end up killing all the terrorists...until they blow him up. :rofl
Click to expand...

What, Arpaio? He'd become someone's bitch faster than you can say "habeas corpus".


Duke
 
Duke said:
Oh... The psychopath to which I was referring was Joe Arpaio.


Duke
Click to expand...

Sheriff Joe isn't that bad. He's done quite a few good things, and lots of commendable things.
 
repeter said:
Sheriff Joe isn't that bad. He's done quite a few good things, and lots of commendable things.
Click to expand...

And far more condemnable things. But I don't think this is the forum for that discussion.


Duke
 
repeter said:
No, DamnYankee is being dumb. We should give them to Sheriff Joe in Arizona.
Click to expand...

Typical leftists. Unable to debate the topic so you name call. You people are pathetic.
 
DamnYankee said:
Typical leftists. Unable to debate the topic so you name call. You people are pathetic.
Click to expand...

Nobody's debating any topic here; in fact, there's hardly a topic to debate. Relax, my man.:roll:


Duke
 
DamnYankee said:
Typical leftists. Unable to debate the topic so you name call. You people are pathetic.
Click to expand...

If I was name calling...hehe...but seriously, all I meant was to ask you to reconsider your "positions." And I'm name calling? "Typical leftists."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom