- Joined
- May 1, 2013
- Messages
- 119,706
- Reaction score
- 75,658
- Location
- Outside Seattle
- Gender
- Female
- Political Leaning
- Independent
great, then you understand why abortion can not be banned by the government, and you also understand why same sex marriage, interracial marriage etc can not be banned by the government.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
The Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution, no?
Neither did it say it should be illegal.
And whatever the Constitution says or doesn't say is up to the SCOTUS to decide.
You have no idea what its original intent was. Nor could you possibly come up with even one good reason as to why anyone would go with the original intent. Unless of course it is to say that your forefathers have done all your thinking for you so obviously you see no need to try thinking for yourself
Yeah, but they’re NOT SUPPOSED to be activists, but interpreters. For example, I’m a heterosexual, and even I don’t have a “Constitutional right” to marriage. Whatever is NOT in the US Constitution is left up to the states. I’m even willing to admit the Patriot Act was unconstitutional.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The SCOTUS as in the Supreme Court of the United States.
But why? Do you think those guys in the powdered wigs knew everything? They didn’t even agree with each other.
Read the 5th Amendment and also read the 14th Amendment AGAIN. "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
Apparently all human beings are supposed to be equally protected.
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
probably enamored with the 3/5 compromise of the original document:
Three-fifths compromise | History, Slavery, & Significance | Britannica
This is coming from people who read Howard Zinn.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Where does it say that money is speech and that corporations are people too. A hint, it doesn't.
No, it goes to the states.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Then you have no right to be married
No, actually it’s up to the states.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is the barely coherent and grammatically inept speech of a man who desperately wants to be able to claim that he "cured coronavirus."
That's it, in a nutshell. When we do get a handle on this crisis, he wants to be able to pull out footage and declare "I called it! I said use this! I said try this! I told them to do this, it was my idea!" He's just doing it with lots of stupid stuff because he doesnt want to miss an opportunity. He's afraid 'the big one' will be mentioned and he wont get credit for it.
It's all about declaring himself the savior of the cv crisis and we'll hear all about it, esp in his campaign. (Which is basically each of his press briefings these days) --- Lursa
I already said I don’t according to the US Constitution in another post. It’s a STATE ISSUE.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nothing in the states, their laws, can overrule the Constitution, so no state can make any laws that violate women's rights as protected in the Const.
Do you understand that?
great, then you understand why abortion can not be banned by the government, and you also understand why same sex marriage, interracial marriage etc can not be banned by the government.
Ok just read it. Both cover abortion and marriage.Read the 5th Amendment and also read the 14th Amendment AGAIN.
correct"nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."
right. it's why abortion bans were struck down, and why interracial and same sex marriage bans were struck down. The constitution precludes banning them.Apparently all human beings are supposed to be equally protected.
It says person. US says a fetus is not a person
Cue the slavery speech
No, it goes to the states.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
abortion is legal in all 50 states, because no state is permitted to ban it.Even if abortion was LEGAL in every state it’s still a state issue.
no it isn't. you have a constitutional right to marriage. Loving v Virginia, obergefell v hodges.And even even the 5th and 14th Amendments say that you cannot deprive “LIFE, liberty, and property without due process of law”. I’m a straight man and I have no Constitutional right to marriage as I’ve said SEVERAL TIMES. It’s a state issue.
Even if abortion was LEGAL in every state it’s still a state issue. And even even the 5th and 14th Amendments say that you cannot deprive “LIFE, liberty, and property without due process of law”. I’m a straight man and I have no Constitutional right to marriage as I’ve said SEVERAL TIMES. It’s a state issue.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
As I’ve said before, the 3/5ths clause has to do with REPRESENTATION, not what a person is! Good grief. There you go again with your Zinn, Alinsky, Davis, Ayers narratives!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You also have no right to vote
Nothing in the states, their laws, can overrule the Constitution, so no state can make any laws that violate women's rights as protected in the Const.
Do you understand that?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?