When Trump becomes President.............

[Cope]

How is it silly or off topic...he said WHEN he becomes president...I added IF and then I challenged Trump supporters, including Bucky as to what they would do if he were disqualified from being president.

Yes, it was supposed to be meant as a thought process, which even I understood. Perhaps if you wanted to discuss something else, start a thread?

 

[Uncensored2008]

I did not realize protesting was "sinister". Wow, so much for believing in the 1A.

It was when Americans protested on J6.

But we have two different standards of law.

 

[Uncensored2008]

First, throw up. Second, prepare to follow Joe Hill’s advice to his supporters as he faced execution: “Don’t mourn, organize.”

So you will engage in violent insurrection, like the democrat Brown Shirts at CHAZ/CHOP did.

Nah. Our patriotism and sense of humor will save it from Trump’s more extreme plans.

Patriotism among democrats is less common than wings among pigs.

Our reaction or resistance — aside from the usual crazies who bedevil activists on both political sides — will likely match Trump’s levels of illegitimate actions, no more.

That would be nice, but highly unlikely from the left. Violence is the standard of the left. Two years of Kristallnacht with the Floyd riots show that the left is extremely violent.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Breaking into the Capitol is protected by the 1st Amendment? Source?

Oh, but we know that the laws used to beat Americans into submission don't apply to the democrats.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Grief, denial, acceptance. I think The View says after that he will round up his enemies in the FBI, DOJ, and Joe BVioden and put them before firing squads, and then he will move on to gays and transexuals.

The way Biden did with the J6 Nazi show trials and the thousand plus political prisoners held?

 

[CaughtInThe]

Republicans literally support a crybaby who wears men's clothes.

 

[Questerr]

Oh, but we know that the laws used to beat Americans into submission don't apply to the democrats.

nice deflection to whataboutism. Let me ask my question again: is breaking into the Capitol protected by the 1st Amendment?

 

[ClaraD]

Yes, it was supposed to be meant as a thought process, which even I understood. Perhaps if you wanted to discuss something else, start a thread?

This is the appropriate thread...perhaps you can stop playing moderator.

 

[Questerr]

The way Biden did with the J6 Nazi show trials and the thousand plus political prisoners held?

Biden was in charge of those trials?

 

[eohrnberger]

nice deflection to whataboutism. Let me ask my question again: is breaking into the Capitol protected by the 1st Amendment?

Since when ISN'T equal treatment by the law and equal application by the law NOT a 'whataboutism' topic when there is a clear disparity??

 

[Uncensored2008]

Biden was in charge of those trials?

I suppose you could say that Xi Jinping is actually running things, but Joe Biden is the pResident. It was his department of Injustice that started a nationwide hunt for those who voted against Joe.

 

[Questerr]

Since when ISN'T equal treatment by the law and equal application by the law NOT a 'whataboutism' topic when there is a clear disparity??

We can have a conversation about the law not being equally enforced, but that is a separate conversation. First, answer whether or not invading the Capitol is protected by the 1st Amendment.

 

[Questerr]

I suppose you could say that Xi Jinping is actually running things, but Joe Biden is the pResident. It was his department of Injustice that started a nationwide hunt for those who voted against Joe.

So you are saying Biden micromanages the trials conducted by the DoJ?

 

[Uncensored2008]

nice deflection to whataboutism. Let me ask my question again: is breaking into the Capitol protected by the 1st Amendment?

Not if you're an enemy of the autocrat party.

But as Hamas protesters showed last week, if you're promoting a leftist agenda, it's just fine.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you are saying Biden micromanages the trials conducted by the DoJ?

Please quote the post where I wrote that?

 

[Pyrite]

It was when Americans protested on J6.

But we have two different standards of law.

Jan 6, the violent attempt to overturn the election results and overthrow the Government?

That was no "protest".

 

[Pyrite]

I suppose you could say that Xi Jinping is actually running things, but Joe Biden is the pResident. It was his department of Injustice that started a nationwide hunt for those who voted against Joe.

Xi more realistically might "actually run things", should his admirer trump be reinstated in the WH.

You're not aware of how much the presumptive Republican nominee fawns over the leader of the PRC?

 

[MamboDervish]

I suppose you could say that Xi Jinping is actually running things, but Joe Biden is the pResident. It was his department of Injustice that started a nationwide hunt for those who voted against Joe.

A steaming pile of horseshit.

 

[Pyrite]

We can have a conversation about the law not being equally enforced, but that is a separate conversation. First, answer whether or not invading the Capitol is protected by the 1st Amendment.

I, too, would like to see @eohrnberger's answer to this question....

 

[Questerr]

Not if you're an enemy of the autocrat party.

But as Hamas protesters showed last week, if you're promoting a leftist agenda, it's just fine.

Is it protected or not?

 

[Questerr]

Please quote the post where I wrote that?

So you admit Biden isn’t in charge of the trials the DoJ conducts? Good. Why did you lie before?

 

[MamboDervish]

I, too, would like to see @Uncensored2008's answer to this question....

How ironic that Uncensored would be engaging in self censorship.

 

[eohrnberger]

We can have a conversation about the law not being equally enforced, but that is a separate conversation.

I'm decidedly against that assertion.

First, answer whether or not invading the Capitol is protected by the 1st Amendment.

You were the one who called 'whataboutism', and now you back off?
I guess there must not have been all that much behind that assertion of 'whataboutism' then after all. OK by me.

 

[Questerr]

I'm decidedly against that assertion.


You were the one who called 'whataboutism', and now you back off?
I guess there must not have been all that much behind that assertion of 'whataboutism' then after all. OK by me.

Why are you afraid on answering such a simple question?

 

[eohrnberger]

Why are you afraid on answering such a simple question?

Which question was that?
It's you who's dodging about the 'whataboutism' that you yourself called. Why are you redirecting on that point?

Hey, listen, just because you claim so crap that you believe others did, doesn't mean that it went beyond your own fevered imagination.

What is your response to:

Since when ISN'T equal treatment by the law and equal application by the law NOT a 'whataboutism' topic when there is a clear disparity??

And how is

I'm decidedly against that assertion.

the assertion being that storming the Capitol build is covered by the first amendment, not an answer to a simple question.

Just because you claim so crap that you believe others did, doesn't mean that it went beyond your own fevered imagination.