- Joined
- Sep 29, 2007
- Messages
- 29,262
- Reaction score
- 10,126
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Jesus Christ I was married by the Counsel general in the American embassy.......Do you really think they would have married us if it wasn't legal......You get more ridiculous with every post.
I was stationed in South Korea.
Jesus Christ I was married by the Counsel general in the American embassy.......Do you really think they would have married us if it wasn't legal......You get more ridiculous with every post.
So you have nothing basically. You claim that the Ballot Box will determine it and when the ballot box has gone against you, you create mirages in the desert. You were wrong. It will be the Courts or it will be what we have :2wave:
In fact I have been paying attention and I know 41 states have all banned gay marriage and 9 states have allowed it (all blue) now you have to deal with red states..........good luck
Wrong. In Missouri (and I suspect many other states as well) it was illegal. Try again.Which has nothing to do with nothing. I was married to and Asian in 1966 so nice try. There were zero restrictions when I got married.
According to the good residents of the State of Missouri your marriage was illegal and should have never happened. Had you been here it wouldn't have happened. Your continued denial of the facts change nothing.March 17 1966 I was married in Seoul Korea by the counsel general of the U.S.
Libertarians align themselves to the religious right by voting conservative as they often do.
SO.... because Classical Liberalists vote conservatively on economic concerns, that makes us sellouts? Economic conservatism is something that is fundamental to Classical Liberalism (Libertarianism) btw.
What is "economic conservatism"?
LOL.....keep living in the past...the rest of us are moving on to the future. Bye Bye.......
According to the good residents of the State of Missouri your marriage was illegal and should have never happened. Had you been here it wouldn't have happened. Your continued denial of the facts change nothing.
Your getting desperate my left wing friend...Again interracial marrige is not the same as SSM and never will be and you know it....It is a slippery slope that won't work.
“Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he
placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his
arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he
separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix.”
(Source: Virginia trial judge upholding conviction of Mildred and Richard
Loving for interracial marriage, quoted in Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 3
(1967))
How is it different? The primary argument used back when interracial marriage was banned was:
Why is it different this time? And why do you believe that marriage is only a christian concept?
You're absolutely right, it didn't. It also never supported forcing christian values on non-believers via government force, which really makes every religious argument moot. I just wish more people could see that.To be honest Rabid, the Bible never supported the interracial laws etc. It does however include homosexual practices in the same category as incest, fornication and adultery. Sexual sins are part of Christianity, racism is not. This of course is not a reason to deny same sex couples who are adults the same protections under our secular law.
How is it different? The primary argument used back when interracial marriage was banned was:
Why is it different this time? And why do you believe that marriage is only a christian concept?
As I have said a dozen times but you lefties just don't get it so I will say it one more time......Interracial is a marriage between a man and a woman....SSM is betwween 2 people of the same sex. No comparison at all. I know your a lefty and its very difficult for you when you cite left wing talking points on the issues but they just don't equate...........
As I have said a dozen times but you lefties just don't get it so I will say it one more time......Interracial is a marriage between a man and a woman....SSM is betwween 2 people of the same sex. No comparison at all. I know your a lefty and its very difficult for you when you cite left wing talking points on the issues but they just don't equate...........
Classic NP. Anyone who doesn't hate gays is clearly a lefty.
And yes, the same exact arguments were used
My question again: What part of the bible told you to use the government to force non-believers to do what you want? Why do you feel that you can judge gays? Did god not say that he's the only one who can judge?
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.
SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.
I judge no one.[/SIZE]
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.
SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.
I judge no one.[/SIZE]
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.
SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.
I judge no one.[/SIZE]
Well I hate no one and I am not and I am no lefty.
SIZE=4]I don't care what non believers do....In the end they will answer to God for their sins as we all will.
I judge no one.[/SIZE]
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?