When it comes to pu**y, which is worse

[CLAX1911]

You've been defending Trump's ***** grabbing comment for pages and days.

what does the word defending mean to you?

Would you like me to link all of your posts or are you able to scroll back through them yourself if you can't remember what you wrote?

We would just be talking past each other at this point what you would have to do is explain what you mean by defending.

 

[Nalu]

I find people tend to say this when they have argued themselves into a corner.



Lol auto correct.



I admire your ability to look up code but in order for what Donald Trump to have said to be under the jurisdiction of this law it would have meant to say it about a particular person.


I really only dismiss the banal idiotic crap. The claim that he's racist or homophobic or whatever. There's just no evidence for it. Who says what a certain type of person says about somebody when they don't like them.



It seems the moral standing is lying down. Only have morality with regard to Donald Trump.

I didn't say that Trump saying what he said was illegal. I specifically said that what he said was not illegal. You said verbal abuse doesn't exist. You've said many such hopelessly ridiculous things in this thread.

I only have morality with regard to Trump? As I said before, you've gone off the deep end. You can call it a retreat again if that makes you feel better, but as with most things and Trump supporters, living in your own warped version of reality doesn't make you right.

 

[Nalu]

what does the word defending mean to you?

We would just be talking past each other at this point what you would have to do is explain what you mean by defending.

Ffs, man, this has to stop. English is not my first language, but I'm fluent in it. So defending means to me what it means to people who are fluent in English. Here's the definition. I imagine your googler works just as well as mine does, so save me the trouble and do it yourself next time.

speak or write in favor of (an action or person); attempt to justify.

 

[CLAX1911]

I didn't say that Trump saying what he said was illegal.

I didn't say that you said it was illegal.

I specifically said that what he said was not illegal. You said verbal abuse doesn't exist. You've said many such hopelessly ridiculous things in this thread.

that's false I said verbal assault doesn't exist.

I only have morality with regard to Trump?

it seems that way anybody can do or say anything they want as long as they have the right politics.

As I said before, you've gone off the deep end. You can call it a retreat again if that makes you feel better, but as with most things and Trump supporters, living in your own warped version of reality doesn't make you right.

What it is is it's an ad hominem people do that when they're losing an argument.

 

[CLAX1911]

Ffs, man, this has to stop. English is not my first language, but I'm fluent in it. So defending means to me what it means to people who are fluent in English.

than I wasn't defending him then, I have never defended Donald Trump.

So clearly you don't know what it means or you're lying.

Here's the definition. I imagine your googler works just as well as mine does, so save me the trouble and do it yourself next time.

speak or write in favor of (an action or person); attempt to justify.

I never said anything in favor of a person or action. So if that's the definition you're using then are you lying?

 

[Nalu]

This has just gotten too weird for me. I don't know if you get off on posting weird stuff like this or if perhaps you have an issue that is none of my business, but we're both just wasting time now, which is not one of my goals for participating in this forum.

I didn't say that you said it was illegal.

You: I admire your ability to look up code but in order for what Donald Trump to have said to be under the jurisdiction of this law it would have meant to say it about a particular person.


You: there is no such thing as verbal assault.

Me: You said verbal abuse doesn't exist.

You:

that's false I said verbal assault doesn't exist.

it seems that way anybody can do or say anything they want as long as they have the right politics.

What it is is it's an ad hominem people do that when they're losing an argument.

Yeah, ok.

 

[Nalu]

than i wasn't defending him then, i have never defended donald trump.

So clearly you don't know what it means or you're lying.



I never said anything in favor of a person or action. So if that's the definition you're using then are you lying?

attempt to justify

 

[CLAX1911]

This has just gotten too weird for me. I don't know if you get off on posting weird stuff like this or if perhaps you have an issue that is none of my business, but we're both just wasting time now, which is not one of my goals for participating in this forum.

I'm sorry you're having trouble with this. maybe in the future you should think about your words before you type them.

You: I admire your ability to look up code but in order for what Donald Trump to have said to be under the jurisdiction of this law it would have meant to say it about a particular person.

I'm sorry you had to cite something that was irrelevant maybe in the future don't do that.

wlYou: there is no such thing as verbal assault.

Me: You said verbal abuse doesn't exist.

You:



Yeah, ok.

Well it's good that you agree with this but it doesn't really help your argument.

 

[CLAX1911]

attempt to justify

What needs justification? How am I attempting to justify something if I don't even know that it needs justification?

 

[marke]

Yes, Trump was only 61, a kid with a dream.

Fortunately for Trump, he converted from the democrat party and cleaned up his act before entering the WH. He is accused of having done things in the past for which he was never charged or convicted, but late term accusations have been common in our modern political civil war atmosphere. I'm sure democrats did not express enough outrage over the sins of democrats, like Bobby Scott, who did not just talk about touching women's body parts but actually did touch them inappropriately as a 66 year old congressman.

And who can forget the many indiscretions of John Conyers and Al Franken, other democrats who had histories of going after the sex organs of unwilling victims while serving in Congress? Democrats give the appearance of hypocritical outrage over things Trump is accused of having done in his past while giving the friendly wink to democrats who have been doing those things while in office.

 

[marke]

You've been defending Trump's ***** grabbing comment for pages and days. Would you like me to link all of your posts or are you able to scroll back through them yourself if you can't remember what you wrote?

Trump talked about grabbing women's sex organs before entering politics. Politicians like Bill Clinton, John Conyers, Al Franken, Bobby Scott and many others did grab women's sex organs while serving in Congress. Has nobody but me noticed the difference in democrat outrage over the sins of republicans as compared to the outrage over the sins of democrats?

 

[bongsaway]

1. For young boys to mention the female anatomy in dirty talk?
2. For grown men to talk dirty like teenage boys?
3. For grown men not to just talk about sex, but to perform sex with multiple women?
4. For grown men to have sex with minors?
5. For grown men to rape employees or young volunteer assistants?
6. For grown men to lust after other grown men and to not give a flip about having sex with women?

I ask because there is so much talk nowadays about how bad it was for Trump to talk dirty when he was younger.

How about you republicans just stay out of americans sex lives? What is the fascination?

 

[Quag]

1. For young boys to mention the female anatomy in dirty talk?
2. For grown men to talk dirty like teenage boys?
3. For grown men not to just talk about sex, but to perform sex with multiple women?
4. For grown men to have sex with minors?
5. For grown men to rape employees or young volunteer assistants?
6. For grown men to lust after other grown men and to not give a flip about having sex with women?

I ask because there is so much talk nowadays about how bad it was for Trump to talk dirty when he was younger.

1. NP
2. Talking sex like teenage boys is crass bit not wrong per say. Boasting about sexual assault is. (ie claiming to grab em by the *****)
3. Depends on the situation. In a swingers group its ok as they are all agreed. Cheating on your wife behind her back not so much
4. Illegal as minors re not in a position to give consent
5. Rape is never OK
6. Why would anyone care?

 

[rjay]

Fortunately for Trump, he converted from the democrat party and cleaned up his act before entering the WH. He is accused of having done things in the past for which he was never charged or convicted, but late term accusations have been common in our modern political civil war atmosphere. I'm sure democrats did not express enough outrage over the sins of democrats, like Bobby Scott, who did not just talk about touching women's body parts but actually did touch them inappropriately as a 66 year old congressman.

And who can forget the many indiscretions of John Conyers and Al Franken, other democrats who had histories of going after the sex organs of unwilling victims while serving in Congress? Democrats give the appearance of hypocritical outrage over things Trump is accused of having done in his past while giving the friendly wink to democrats who have been doing those things while in office.

Your post sounds like a friendly wink to Trump.

 

[Nalu]

Trump talked about grabbing women's sex organs before entering politics. Politicians like Bill Clinton, John Conyers, Al Franken, Bobby Scott and many others did grab women's sex organs while serving in Congress. Has nobody but me noticed the difference in democrat outrage over the sins of republicans as compared to the outrage over the sins of democrats?

I have no idea. Ask a Democrat.

 

[danielpalos]

equality and equal rights! you grab Me, i get to grab You!

any women, brave enough to "do unto others as you would have others do unto you?"

 

[Rich2018]

Good. The Congress has maintained this status quo for decades. Everything that's wrong with our country legislatively speaking is on them...

You'd think so, since Congress is the national legislature

...again good.

You sound like a Christians who thinks it's good that they have a god who plans to torment, in a fiery lake for all eternity, the majority of all people who ever lived.

Why do you fall for Trump's base nationalism again ?

 

[danielpalos]

...see chics, Men really are into equality.

 

[CLAX1911]

You'd think so, since Congress is the national legislature

yes we pick the executive based on things they're going to do. we picked to this executive because he was talking about draining the swamp. The swamp monsters are resisting it not a surprise.

You sound like a Christians who thinks it's good that they have a god who plans to torment, in a fiery lake for all eternity, the majority of all people who ever lived.

I think you mistook Christian for devil worshiper. I don't think any Christian thinks that God torments people that's Satan. if you worship a God that torments people you are most likely a devil worshiper or a Satanist.

Why do you fall for Trump's base nationalism again ?

Because I'm a nationalist.

 

[Rich2018]

...we picked to this executive because he was talking about draining the swamp. The swamp monsters are resisting it not a surprise....

Actually "we" cast about 3 million more votes for Hillary but what has Trump done to "drain the swamp" - there's been the withdrawal from Syria, do you count that ?

...I think you mistook Christian for devil worshiper. I don't think any Christian thinks that God torments people that's Satan. if you worship a God that torments people you are most likely a devil worshiper or a Satanist.

Er no, even the Christian churches that preach love, say that god casts down the hell all those who don't believe in him

There are churches who said god rules in hell and torments the unbelieving souls there:


YouTube


Around 1:50:20

...because I'm a nationalist.

You could admit to being a racist and only receive slightly less condemnation in my opinion.

Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel - said Samuel Johnson in 1775.

 

[RAMOSS]

Now I just doubt your statement that you are a homosexual. And I'm done with your response here. Later

He has said he was homosexual since I have been here, and considering his discussions, I see all evidence he is. On the other hand, he's a Texas conservative, so that skews his politics a LOT.

 

[Rich2018]

He has said he was homosexual since I have been here, and considering his discussions, I see all evidence he is. On the other hand, he's a Texas conservative, so that skews his politics a LOT.

That must cause confusion in the mind, Trump supporter who believes in LGBT rights.

 

[Nalu]

Fortunately for Trump, he converted from the democrat party and cleaned up his act before entering the WH. He is accused of having done things in the past for which he was never charged or convicted, but late term accusations have been common in our modern political civil war atmosphere. I'm sure democrats did not express enough outrage over the sins of democrats, like Bobby Scott, who did not just talk about touching women's body parts but actually did touch them inappropriately as a 66 year old congressman.

And who can forget the many indiscretions of John Conyers and Al Franken, other democrats who had histories of going after the sex organs of unwilling victims while serving in Congress? Democrats give the appearance of hypocritical outrage over things Trump is accused of having done in his past while giving the friendly wink to democrats who have been doing those things while in office.

Conyers and Franken aren't in office anymore. :roll:

 

[SDET]

How did you joining this message board change his sexual orientation? This ought to be interesting!

He has said he was homosexual since I have been here, and considering his discussions, I see all evidence he is. On the other hand, he's a Texas conservative, so that skews his politics a LOT.

 

[marke]

Conyers and Franken aren't in office anymore. :roll:

Good. All sex perverts who commit sex crimes while in office should be removed.