• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What threatens National Security more? (1 Viewer)

What threatens National Security more?

  • Leaking the name of a CIA operative, whose status was classified

    Votes: 7 87.5%

  • Leaking the secret wiretapping that the White House was doing

    Votes: 1 12.5%
  • Total voters
    8
A

aps

Passionate
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 25, 2005
Messages
15,675
Reaction score
2,979
Gender
Female
Political Leaning
Liberal
What I find interesting is that the Bush Administration is willing to leak the name of a CIA operative, but then cries when a person leaks the secret wiretapping.

Hmmmmmm.....double standard?
 
aps said:
What I find interesting is that the Bush Administration is willing to leak the name of a CIA operative, but then cries when a person leaks the secret wiretapping.

Hmmmmmm.....double standard?
Click to expand...

C'mon, aps! You know better than that! There is quite a significant difference between one classified (not covert, hence not illegal to do identify) CIA person and endangering a program that has the potential to save many lives.

It is certainly ok to question the legality of the NSA surveillance program, and/or Bush's motives or whatever, and its ok to go whereever one's impressions take one in regard to the Plame affair, but lets keep a proper perspective on the relative seriousness of the two.

But thats just my opinion - YMMV!
 
oldreliable67 said:
C'mon, aps! You know better than that! There is quite a significant difference between one classified (not covert, hence not illegal to do identify) CIA person and endangering a program that has the potential to save many lives.

It is certainly ok to question the legality of the NSA surveillance program, and/or Bush's motives or whatever, and its ok to go whereever one's impressions take one in regard to the Plame affair, but lets keep a proper perspective on the relative seriousness of the two.

But thats just my opinion - YMMV!
Click to expand...

I do not know better than that. How dare you talk to me in such a condescending manner. ;) I'm kidding, my conservative friend.

I just don't like seeing Bush get his panties in a wad over the leaking of information when his administration has no qualms about leaking classified information.

P.S. What does YMMV mean?
 
oldreliable67 said:
There is quite a significant difference between one classified (not covert, hence not illegal to do identify) CIA person and endangering a program that has the potential to save many lives.
Click to expand...

How did leaking the existence of such a program "endanger" it? If there's nothing morally or legally wrong with the program, then public knowledge of the program won't endanger it.
 
Kandahar said:
How did leaking the existence of such a program "endanger" it? If there's nothing morally or legally wrong with the program, then public knowledge of the program won't endanger it.
Click to expand...

I agree. Would anyone being wiretapped know that they were being wiretapped if a court order was obtained? I didn't think so.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Back
Top Bottom