- Joined
- Feb 21, 2015
- Messages
- 2,106
- Reaction score
- 488
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The answer to you questions are available via the link I provided. As to the Koch Bros, they aren't planning on spending $890 mill of their own money. Again, another meme with no basis in fact.
Do you know how much money the Democracy Alliance is planning to spend? That's the Soro's affiliated Billionaire Club of Liberal/Progressive donors.
The bigger question is, should big money be in politics? Why not? Who's benefitting? Are they torching the money in giant bon fires, or spending it to hire people, print flyers, fund the creation of websites, etc, etc..
To suggest it's wrong, is to suggest voters are just a bunch of mind numbed robots easily swayed by shiny objects and slick messages. If you think that's true, then I can understand why people don't like big money in politics.
For example, when political message and ideology can be forced down children's throats in our nations classrooms via liberal messaging by Big Liberal Education, a counter to that propaganda must be made available. Remove this force feeding, and perhaps some of the big money can be removed. To simply remove it, while maintaining the ability to legally manipulate, is not fair to any party, or political persuasion.
The only Liberal/Progressive party is Bennie Sanders. Which I will vote for, because as of now he is not taking corporate money.
The rest are owed by Rich guys or corporations, & I don't care what you're link says the Koch's own the Rep's.
No there should not be big money in politics. Do you prefer oligarchy or a government for the people. Its the same problem we had before the depression.
The rest is just Right Wing propaganda. There is a big push to privatize schools, who's behind that?