• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What should the minimum wage be?

Should there be a minimum wage? If so, what should it be?


  • Total voters
    50
who? is that a racist joke? i dont get it?


the racist joke was a twit whose only proven connection to the "trail of tears" was an ancestor who was a white militia officer known for his brutality towards Native Americans, claiming she was part Cherokee. That indeed was a racist joke
 
the racist joke was a twit whose only proven connection to the "trail of tears" was an ancestor who was a white militia officer known for his brutality towards Native Americans, claiming she was part Cherokee. That indeed was a racist joke

okay??? and what does this have to do with anything?
 
And you jump to conclusions - just because I know the history of what happened in the French and Russian and American Revolutions does NOT mean I or any other informed person approved of all that happened in them or after them

That is the side that you chose to identify yourself with. Care to explain why you support a movement the kind of which has so regularly led to such mass chaos, bloodshed, and horror?
 
okay??? and what does this have to do with anything?

citing Lieyawatha is not going to be convincing to anyone but those who have swallowed her litany of lies
 
a whole litany? what else did she lie about?

her entire public posturing is a lie-she is another rich elitist who pretends to care about the commoners in order to gain more wealth and power through public office
 
her entire public posturing is a lie-she is another rich elitist who pretends to care about the commoners in order to gain more wealth and power through public office

as opposed to donald trump? or Jeb Bush?
 
That is the side that you chose to identify yourself with. Care to explain why you support a movement the kind of which has so regularly led to such mass chaos, bloodshed, and horror?

Surgery comes with blood and pain and can be horrifying. So does childbirth and even some chaos mixed in with that as well. Are you against those also?

Or do you accept that with some events those things are inevitable regardless if one wants those elements or not?
 
as opposed to donald trump? or Jeb Bush?

they don't get power by pretending to be against what they are themselves. well at least not Bush I don't pay much attention to Faux Republican Trump
 
Surgery comes with blood and pain and can be horrifying. So does childbirth and even some chaos mixed in with that as well. Are you against those also?

Or do you accept that with some events those things are inevitable regardless if one wants those elements or not?

somehow I don't think you are correct as to who would be doing this "surgery" as you call it
 
Surgery comes with blood and pain and can be horrifying. So does childbirth and even some chaos mixed in with that as well. Are you against those also?

Interesting. So you are saying that the Red Terror in France and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia were net good things because at least they killed all those rich families?
 
somehow I don't think you are correct as to who would be doing this "surgery" as you call it

Don't be too rough on him - he was a public school teacher.
 
somehow I don't think you are correct as to who would be doing this "surgery" as you call it

SURGERY - as in hospital operations cutting open the human body.
 
they don't get power by pretending to be against what they are themselves. well at least not Bush I don't pay much attention to Faux Republican Trump

so you support Jeb Bush because "he's a rich elitist who doesn't pretend to care about the commoners"
 
Don't be too rough on him - he was a public school teacher.

How is your sophomoric attempt at vitriolic attack part of intellectual debate and your own inability to refute my statement?
 
Interesting. So you are saying that the Red Terror in France and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia were net good things because at least they killed all those rich families?

If you want to attack my position, do so by first quoting what my actual position is. For example, in this case where you replied, here is my position that you pretended to reply to

Surgery comes with blood and pain and can be horrifying. So does childbirth and even some chaos mixed in with that as well. Are you against those also?

Again- are you against those also or do you accept those as coming with the territory regardless if someone wants those elements or not?

But cp - you are not stupid. You are of average intelligence and can see that if you answer the question honestly you then destroy your previous attempt to refute me. So you avoid the honest answer.
 
so you support Jeb Bush because "he's a rich elitist who doesn't pretend to care about the commoners"

no, I am noting he is not a hypocrite as Lieywatha is.

Where the GOP tends to be hypocrites are on social issues-like pandering to Bible thumping idiots who think legalizing Gay marriage will result in legalizing stallions buggering young boys or that abortion is akin to the "final solution"-while at the same time cheating on their wives or getting hand jobs from anonymous dudes in airport men's rooms.

or screaming for constitutional rights while wanting to jail someone for burning a flag they themselves own or possess. that is where the GOP tends to be hypocritical
 
Where the GOP tends to be hypocrites are on social issues-like pandering to Bible thumping idiots who think legalizing Gay marriage will result in legalizing stallions buggering young boys or that abortion is akin to the "final solution"-while at the same time cheating on their wives or getting hand jobs from anonymous dudes in airport men's rooms.

or screaming for constitutional rights while wanting to jail someone for burning a flag they themselves own or possess. that is where the GOP tends to be hypocritical

thats why i support elizabeth warren
 
If you want to attack my position, do so by first quoting what my actual position is. For example, in this case where you replied, here is my position that you pretended to reply to

Again- are you against those also or do you accept those as coming with the territory regardless if someone wants those elements or not?

The examples you give are ones in which we accept blood and violence to achieve a positive outcome. Your use of them as an analogy suggests that you believe that the Red Terror in France and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia were net benefits because at least they killed off the people you identified earlier - those evil rich people who dared to have more than someone else. Are you stating or suggesting that the Red Terror in France or the Boshelvik Revolution in Russia was a net good.

But cp - you are not stupid. You are of average intelligence and can see that if you answer the question honestly you then destroy your previous attempt to refute me. So you avoid the honest answer.

:shrug: I usually score in the high 120s to the low 130s on IQ tests. :) But tell me more about sophomoric attacks?
 
thats why i support elizabeth warren

social issues don't matter as much to me as economic freedom and I think the trend is against the idiocy of bible thumpers. Religion, as a club-is losing its power and more and more of the silly mindless nonsense of religious fundamentalists (at least among American Christians if not Mid-eastern Islamists) is dissipating. ON the other hand, the government is doing its best to create more and more dependent teat sucklers among the voting public and the system is rigged towards their increase
 
social issues don't matter as much to me as economic freedom and I think the trend is against the idiocy of bible thumpers. Religion, as a club-is losing its power and more and more of the silly mindless nonsense of religious fundamentalists (at least among American Christians if not Mid-eastern Islamists) is dissipating. ON the other hand, the government is doing its best to create more and more dependent teat sucklers among the voting public and the system is rigged towards their increase

the economy is changing, robots are taking over, haven't you heard? what will unemployment numbers look like then?

there are more people than there are jobs needing to be done, should those extra people simply die?
 
The examples you give are ones in which we accept blood and violence to achieve a positive outcome.

I said nothing about a positive outcome of if I would have supported any of those efforts. Only that such thing occurred and why they occurred.

Your use of them as an analogy suggests that you believe that the Red Terror in France and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia were net benefits because at least they killed off the people you identified earlier - those evil rich people who dared to have more than someone else.

Lots and lots more people died than just the rich. If you do not see that point you really missed something really important. Anyone with a brain and knowledge of history should know when certain conditions happen and revolt and revolution come pass lots and lots and lots of really ****ty stuff happens to lots and lots and lots of people - both good people and bad people and indifferent people. Both to people who helped make it happen and to those who were just shuffling along minding their own sweet business. Thats the nature of the beast.

And that is just one reason why certain people quoting platitudes about winners and losers and the virtues of capitalism and social darwinism and all the rest are playing a very very very dangerous game. And when its played with my country and the American people that I love - I get very very very angry about that sort of ostrich mentality that borders on criminal indifference if not helping to cause the actual horror with can follow.

Are we clear on that?

But tell me more about sophomoric attacks?

Your cheap shot attempt at me is more than enough for you to see.
 
social issues don't matter as much to me as economic freedom and I think the trend is against the idiocy of bible thumpers.

The two - social issues and economics - are inextricably linked together as your own muscle and bone are.
 
the economy is changing, robots are taking over, haven't you heard? what will unemployment numbers look like then?

there are more people than there are jobs needing to be done, should those extra people simply die?

what's your solution?
 
Back
Top Bottom