kylestephens123
New member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2012
- Messages
- 14
- Reaction score
- 5
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
I still am confused as to why the so called "likely" Republican nominee Mitt Romney and the Incumbent Obama are somewhat silent on what should be the main focus of this election, that being Monetary policy.
I'm not talking about budgets and deficits, I'm talking about the Debt and the Federal Reserve. Whatever way you want to spin it, our debt is a result of the Federal Reserve, just as most of our economic issues. Whenever you have a central bank (public or private) you have a nation indebted to it, perpetually. I think it's about time we adress the issue of the Fed, and that's why I support Ron Paul.
Before you write me off as a "PaulBot" or anything, let me plead my case. A common misconception is that the Federal Reserve brings about stability to our economy. Well, anyone that knows anything about Economics knows that business cycles (booms and busts) are inherent to an economy, and it is literally impossible to avoid them. Ironically, the Fed was created to stop boom/busts, but it actually amplifies them.
To prove my point, in the 1920's, 7 years after the Fed was chartered, we had the roarin' twenties. The Fed manipulated interest rates down to nearly 0%, and our country went on a CREDIT FRENZY! Man, things were great. What people didn't realize is that towards the end of the decade, the debt began to catch up to the borrowers and lenders, and the economy collapsed. With the low interest rates and inflation, the Fed created a credit bubble. Then, to make the situation worse, the Fed then detracted the money supply, which had created the economic growth of the twenties, which plunged the the economy into a Depression.
The housing bubble of the 2000's followed the same framework. Alan Greenspan as Fed Chairman continually lowered interest rates to the point that banks were lending to any man that had a mouth and a hand to sign the loan. This fueled an excessive expansion in the housing market, and started the creation of the Credit default swaps, which precipitated the collapse of the market 2006-2008.
What do you guys think? Should monetary policy and the Federal Reserve be at the forefront of the election debate, or are there other topics that you think are more pertinent?
I'm not talking about budgets and deficits, I'm talking about the Debt and the Federal Reserve. Whatever way you want to spin it, our debt is a result of the Federal Reserve, just as most of our economic issues. Whenever you have a central bank (public or private) you have a nation indebted to it, perpetually. I think it's about time we adress the issue of the Fed, and that's why I support Ron Paul.
Before you write me off as a "PaulBot" or anything, let me plead my case. A common misconception is that the Federal Reserve brings about stability to our economy. Well, anyone that knows anything about Economics knows that business cycles (booms and busts) are inherent to an economy, and it is literally impossible to avoid them. Ironically, the Fed was created to stop boom/busts, but it actually amplifies them.
To prove my point, in the 1920's, 7 years after the Fed was chartered, we had the roarin' twenties. The Fed manipulated interest rates down to nearly 0%, and our country went on a CREDIT FRENZY! Man, things were great. What people didn't realize is that towards the end of the decade, the debt began to catch up to the borrowers and lenders, and the economy collapsed. With the low interest rates and inflation, the Fed created a credit bubble. Then, to make the situation worse, the Fed then detracted the money supply, which had created the economic growth of the twenties, which plunged the the economy into a Depression.
The housing bubble of the 2000's followed the same framework. Alan Greenspan as Fed Chairman continually lowered interest rates to the point that banks were lending to any man that had a mouth and a hand to sign the loan. This fueled an excessive expansion in the housing market, and started the creation of the Credit default swaps, which precipitated the collapse of the market 2006-2008.
What do you guys think? Should monetary policy and the Federal Reserve be at the forefront of the election debate, or are there other topics that you think are more pertinent?