What is the true purpose behind these investigations on Donald Trump?

[antiquity]

Not true.

Trump was impeached twice because he is a criminal and he did grossly abuse the power of his office. He was initially impeached for inciting a riot (attempted coup on 1/6/21).

He then attempted to obstruct the investigation into the attempted coup.

Which part is not true...the laptop or how Trump was found not guilty by an impeachment trial?

 

[Galactic Spin]

asked this numerous times What crimes are you referring to?

You haven't read ANYTHING about the several ongoing criminal investigations into Trump?

Are we supposed to sponfeed that information to you?

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Which part is not true...the laptop or how Trump was found not guilty by an impeachment trial?

The impeachment trial was fixed by trump's GQP conspirators.

The laptop is a GQP red hearing designed to distract the world from trump.

 

[antiquity]

Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and the National Association of State Election Directors.

Are these the same 51 security agents who claimed that Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation?

 

[Ren]

No, it does not.

Yes it does.

Epoch times is a nazi publication.

Prove it.

Trump was not cheated. You was beaten fairly.

"You was beaten fairly". You can't even get your grammar straight.

This is an adhom attack and it will be reported.

I said I deal with liar(s). it was a general statement.

 

[antiquity]

You haven't read ANYTHING about the several ongoing criminal investigations into Trump?

Are we supposed to sponfeed that information to you?

So the answer is no I can't supply any crime. Only speculation and hope.

 

[Ren]

No doubt that's why you trust the Epoch Times. The Epoch Times? Really?

Forget the source, prove the story wrong.

ABC released a similar story; be sure to jump their shit too. lol

 

[holbritter]

We ALL just want the truth, not just Dems.

Also to hold him accountable and show NO ONE is above the law.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Yes it does.

No, it does not. That source is invalid to anybody who is not a MAGA or a KKK member.

Prove it.

I already posted the rating on that publican.

"You was beaten fairly". You can't even get your grammar straight.

He was beaten fairly. Deal with it.

I said I deal with liar(s). it was a general statement.

No, it was personal attack and has been reported.

 

[antiquity]

The impeachment trial was fixed by trump's GQP conspirators.

The laptop is a GQP red hearing designed to distract the world from trump.

The funnest post yet to date. Bravo.

 

[Galactic Spin]

Are these the same 51 security agents who claimed that Hunter Biden laptop was Russian disinformation?

No, and what a silly question. Those were all retired agents, and they did not claim that. You got the white wing blogger translation.

Moving on...

 

[antiquity]

We ALL just want the truth, not just Dems.

Also to hold him accountable and show NO ONE is above the law.

Unless you are Hunter Biden and maybe illegal aliens.

 

[Ren]

No, it does not. That source is invalid to anybody who is not a MAGA or a KKK member.

Prove it.

I already posted the rating on that publican.

Doesn't matter. ABC posted a similar story. Where do they rate? lol

He was beaten fairly. Deal with it.

No he wasn't.

No, it was personal attack and has been reported.

No, it was a general response. I've already learned not to aim directly at DP posters.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

The funnest post yet to date. Bravo.

It is the truth. The GQP prevented trump from being convicted because he owns them.

Denying it doesn't make it less true.

 

[antiquity]

No, and what a silly question. Those were all retired agents, and they did not claim that. You got the white wing blogger translation.

Moving on...

Wow and I thought the other post was the funniest post ever until you posted the above.

 

[Galactic Spin]

Wow and I thought the other post was the funniest post ever until you posted the above.

I now see what we can expect from you as far as your intellectual ceiling.

 

[ColdHardTruth]

Prove it.

This is the mark of a guilty mind. You are defeated on this issue.

Doesn't matter. ABC posted a similar story. Where do they rate? lol

Sure it does. I posted four sources from across the spectrum. You posted one source that is used by nazis and MAGAs.

No he wasn't.

Yes, he was. Your denial doesn't change that.

Trump finally admits he lost the election but still falsely says it was ‘rigged’

Conversation came ahead of publication of book about his presidency

news.yahoo.com

'Can You Believe I Lost to This Guy?' Trump Admitted He Lost Election, Former Aide Says

Alyssa Farah Griffin said that while Trump watched Joe Biden on TV, he asked, "Can you believe I lost to this guy?"

www.rollingstone.com

No, it was a general response. I've already learned not to aim directly at DP posters.

Not true. It's reported.

 

[Ren]

I niw see what we can expect from you as far as your intellectual ceiling.

My ceiling exceeds yours.

Choose one of my posts and let's get to disproving. I assure you I won't post anything even remotely trollish.

 

[lwf]

Is that what democrats are doing? Speculating? Or are they skipping the speculation piece and going straight to a guilty verdict? It's the latter, don't you think?

What is the difference between speculating that someone is guilty and "going straight to the guilty verdict" in this case?

 

[Galactic Spin]

My ceiling exceeds yours.

Choose one of my posts and let's get to disproving. I assure you I won't post anything even remotely trollish.

(Wasn't aiming that at you)

 

[holbritter]

What crimes? Name those crimes.

Impersonating a human being.

 

[Ren]

This is the mark of a guilty mind. You are defeated on this issue.

This is the mark of someone who doesn't believe you.

Sure it does. I posted four sources from across the spectrum. You posted one source that is used by nazis and MAGAs.

I see. So you're going to use one false claim to back up another false claim.

OK, let's start with the first false claim:

Point out where Trump supporters are nazis.

We'll dispense with the rest of the hogwash until you address this first slice of bullshit.

 

[Ren]

What is the difference between speculating that someone is guilty and "going straight to the guilty verdict" in this case?

"I think Trump is guilty"

Or

"Trump is guilty"

Which is more reckless of the two?

 

[Jacksprat]

"I think Trump is guilty"

Or

"Trump is guilty"

Which is more reckless of the two?

Trump has been a criminal his whole life.

 

[Ren]

Trump has been a criminal his whole life.

This is the dumbest post of the day. lol