- Joined
- Jul 6, 2005
- Messages
- 18,930
- Reaction score
- 1,040
- Location
- HBCA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Very Liberal
Excuse me!Originally Posted by Oftencold
Troops are not for arresting criminals. They are for causing vast destruction, death, suffering and most importantly, enormous contrition in one's enemies.
Precise strikes are part of the problem. The general Palestinian population seem to support these savages, (making them savages themselves, of course.) All Palestinians who survive this war need to understand that their model of politics through terror is probably only going to win them land in the form of unmarked, communal graves.
Well, unless I missed something, the proper response to Hamas rockets is to fire super laser space beams from out of a Tom Clancy novel to take out the terrorists without harming citizens.
Is that about right?
I wouldn't be so sure, despite political differences they still see them as Palestinians. Israel's attacks are only pushing them closer together. The Fatah is having difficult times preventing people of the West Bank from openly supporting Hamas and starting protests on Israeli lines.
No the proper response is to carpet bomb they with gummy bears and cracklings.
Israel should calmly ask Hamas to quit bombing them.
Fission and fusion bombs are both nuclear.
WRONG.
The atom bombs dropped on Japan were substantially weaker and less destructive than the current nuclear weapons.
There is a VAST difference.
WRONG.
The atom bombs dropped on Japan were substantially weaker and less destructive than the current nuclear weapons.
There is a VAST difference.
I've had a few debates with people in (in "real life"), and as I'm an artist and generally keep artists for company, I'm pretty much alone in my position that Israel has the right to eradicate active threats to its people. The discussion always devolves into who threw spitballs at whom first, (e.g. "Hasn't Israel had a tendency to overreact in the past?" as if that has any bearing on what's going on right now) and the fact that Hamas was launching rockets at Israeli population centers during the course of the cease fire is ignored or waved aside.
So, forget who was naughty first. Hamas launches rockets at Israel.
If military retaliation is not the correct response, then what is?
By the way, you are aware that rockets are being launched from civilian structures, are you not?
I think the proper response to Hamas rockets is the total destruction of Hamas and for Israel to take over Gaza and rule it. Then the people will be better off and Israel will never have to fight another terrorist government that rules in Gaza. Simple.
Israel should calmly ask Hamas to quit bombing them.
Accepting one of the various olive-branches offered to Israel, rather than rejecting out of hand any that doesn't include the complete removal of Islam from the Promised Land would work. The problem is that Israel is a power-house in that part of the world, mostly because we (the most powerful country in the world) support them.I've had a few debates with people in (in "real life"), and as I'm an artist and generally keep artists for company, I'm pretty much alone in my position that Israel has the right to eradicate active threats to its people. The discussion always devolves into who threw spitballs at whom first, (e.g. "Hasn't Israel had a tendency to overreact in the past?" as if that has any bearing on what's going on right now) and the fact that Hamas was launching rockets at Israeli population centers during the course of the cease fire is ignored or waved aside.
So, forget who was naughty first. Hamas launches rockets at Israel.
If military retaliation is not the correct response, then what is?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?