What is the Biden/Harris Plan on Immigration...

[SMTA]

I asked what the plan was "other than letting pretty much everyone in and giving them free healthcare?"

Anyone with modest intelligence would understand that (together with the rest of the OP) to mean: what is the plan to secure our borders and enforce any limitations at all on immigration?

There's nothing that I could find in the Biden "plan" that addresses that.

For someone who is complaining about laziness, you seem far too lazy to bother to even read the post you're complaining about. And if the answer was so clear from that plan, then it should be no trouble for you to quote the relevant part. Chalk up another laziness point. Do you even know what you're voting for?

Strike 2.
Constant whining, still unable to read and links, crying and continuous bitching.
Way to waste everyone’s time here who were civil enough to help you.

 

[Noodlegawd]

You asked for Biden's plan.

You were provided Biden's plan.

You can't comprehend Biden's plan, so now you want us to explain it to you.

It's your fault, not ours. Pay someone to translate it for you. Is Olga finished cleaning the Kremlin toilets? Maybe she can help.

Learn to read.

 

[Noodlegawd]

Strike 2.
Constant whining, still unable to read and links, crying and continuous bitching.
Way to waste everyone’s time here who were civil enough to help you.

Help me with what, providing a link to a source that I cited in my OP, that doesn't actually contain what you claim it contains? Big help.

Did you actually read my OP, or just the title? Talk about lazy.

Typical Democrat obfuscation. And you guys claim Trump is dishonest.

 

[SMTA]

You asked for Biden's plan.

You were provided Biden's plan.

You can't comprehend Biden's plan, so now you want us to explain it to you.

It's your fault, not ours. Pay someone to translate it for you. Is Olga finished cleaning the Kremlin toilets? Maybe she can help.

And here is our OP.....

 

[SMTA]

Help me with what, providing a link to a source that I cited in my OP, that doesn't actually contain what you claim it contains? Big help.

Did you actually read my OP, or just the title? Talk about lazy.

Typical Democrat obfuscation. And you guys claim Trump is dishonest.

Strike 3
Folks here gave you Links, which you were unable or too lazy to read.
Stop posting such ****ing garbage.

 

[noonereal]

I did. It's not there.

well then sit on your hands and wait for someone to come along and spoon fed you like all the unsuccessful do.

Peace

 

[SMTA]

You asked for Biden's plan.

You were provided Biden's plan.

You can't comprehend Biden's plan, so now you want us to explain it to you.

It's your fault, not ours. Pay someone to translate it for you. Is Olga finished cleaning the Kremlin toilets? Maybe she can help.

Maybe his Russian / English dictionary is only paper.
Poor little Russian Trump Boris Bot.

 

[tres borrachos]

Learn to read.

Can't read Biden's plan and is begging for help reading it.

Tells someone else to learn to read.

Tell Svetlana it's time for the Vodka and Borscht.

 

[tres borrachos]

Maybe his Russian / English dictionary is only paper.
Poor little Russian Trump Boris Bot.

The Russians are not impressing me these days. Piss poor trolling.

 

[mike2810]

1. I'm not a Trump supporter -- just another one of your lies.

2. I specifically mentioned that manifesto in OP. Feel free to cite the part that says anything about enforcing any limits.

You provided no source for the "manifesto" you posted in your OP.

What do you find as not true from the Biden website?

 

[SMTA]

You provided no source for the "manifesto" you posted in your OP.

What do you find as not true from the Biden website?

Maybe Little Pink Barbie laptops can’t follow links......

 

[SMTA]

The Russians are not impressing me these days. Piss poor trolling.

Don’t say piss poor - Trump himself will drop in before we know it!!

 

[Noodlegawd]

37 posts, and still no one has the guts to quote anything in the plan that proves me wrong. Pretty sad.

 

[Noodlegawd]

You provided no source for the "manifesto" you posted in your OP.

Yes I did. I referred specifically to the "plan" that all the others here are claiming I didn't read, while making it very clear that they have not read it themselves, or that they have read it and either simply cannot come to terms with the fact that it doesn't contain what they wish it does, or they're too chicken to admit that they don't want it to contain any concrete indication of an interest in enforcing our immigration laws.

What do you find as not true from the Biden website?

When did I say anything about it was "not true?" What I said about it is plain as day to anyone who actually read my OP, instead of just reading the topic title:

[It] doesn't appear to say much of anything about actually securing our borders or putting reasonable limits on the number of immigrants we accept each year, humanely or otherwise.

So far, nobody has actually refuted this very specific point.

 

[Conservative]

If you are too lazy to use the Internet to easily find the answer yourself. there is no reason for others here to waste their time looking for you.
Do your own research before posting

Please don't confuse the radical left by asking them tough questions as they would have to wait to be told what to say. Your link is right on, there are no specifics and if you look at the radical State in which Harris comes from you would see the Harris/Biden Illegal immigration plan, fight ICE and protect illegals. You aren't going to change the mind of a radical but the reality is they offer nothing of value to change my mind, just more misguided hate Trump rhetoric. Everything Trump says or does gets an anal exam by the left but when challenged to do the same thing with Biden their response here is their answer

 

[ClaraD]

1. I'm not a Trump supporter -- just another one of your lies.

2. I specifically mentioned that manifesto in OP. Feel free to cite the part that says anything about enforcing any limits.

you and Conservative are in competition for who can apologize for Trump the most...you are a Trump supporter....non supporters do not do that.

 

[mike2810]

Yes I did. I referred specifically to the "plan" that all the others here are claiming I didn't read, while making it very clear that they have not read it themselves, or that they have read it and either simply cannot come to terms with the fact that it doesn't contain what they wish it does, or they're too chicken to admit that they don't want it to contain any concrete indication of an interest in enforcing our immigration laws.



When did I say anything about it was "not true?" What I said about it is plain as day to anyone who actually read my OP, instead of just reading the topic title:



So far, nobody has actually refuted this very specific point.

I was looking at President Trump's site on immigration. Show me where it has reasonable numbers for allow legal immigrants in. I didn't see it.
Trump's and Biden site both state broad objectives.

So what is a reasonable number for you on immigrants?

 

[Bullseye]

...other than letting pretty much everyone in and giving them free healthcare?

I don't agree with much of what Trump is doing, but what is a President Biden going to do? Perhaps more importantly, what would a President Harris do? The incredibly vague, 30+ page long "Biden Plan for Securing ..." doesn't appear to say much of anything about actually securing our borders or putting reasonable limits on the number of immigrants we accept each year, humanely or otherwise. Instead, it starts off by basically telling us it's Trump's fault that a man drowned his child trying to come here illegally. It has a lot to say about making it easier to come here, but pretty much nothing about what to do about those who come or stay here illegally, as if that won't even be a thing anymore.

Whenever a Trump supporter talks about the Democrat policy of "open borders," they're told that's a lie. So what's the actual plan?

The Harris/Biden administration immigration policy is to open the gates and hand out voter registration forms.

 

[Conservative]

you and Conservative are in competition for who can apologize for Trump the most...you are a Trump supporter....non supporters do not do that.

I cannot apologize for the ignorance you and the left continue to promote and spout. There is no apology necessary for Trump has he doesn't have the authority you claim but you are giving the left great coverage for their failures. Blaming someone else is what you do well. You want immigration policy that will be implemented in this country under Harris/Biden? Go to SF or LA not that it will resonate with you nor will the rest of the radical leftwing agenda. Aren't you involved in the trucking industry? What will the Biden Green deal do to you?

Sanctuary City Ordinance | Office of Civic Engagement & Immigrant Affairs

 

[SMTA]

Please don't confuse the radical left by asking them tough questions as they would have to wait to be told what to say. Your link is right on, there are no specifics and if you look at the radical State in which Harris comes from you would see the Harris/Biden Illegal immigration plan, fight ICE and protect illegals. You aren't going to change the mind of a radical but the reality is they offer nothing of value to change my mind, just more misguided hate Trump rhetoric. Everything Trump says or does gets an anal exam by the left but when challenged to do the same thing with Biden their response here is their answer

And here is yet another case of the Putin Trump Bot posting unrelated spam in a DP thread and going unpunished.

 

[Noodlegawd]

you and Conservative are in competition for who can apologize for Trump the most...you are a Trump supporter....non supporters do not do that.

I don't apologize for Trump. I don't even like Trump. I didn't vote for him in 2016, and I won't vote for him in 2020.

I do agree with some of his policies, however, and I also disagree with the slavish way in which Democrats attack him no matter what, so I make that clear in my comments here.

Unlike many supposed "conservatives" and "liberals," I'm actually able to form my own opinions about each separate issue, without having them spoon fed to me by a single political party.

 

[Conservative]

And here is yet another case of the Putin Trump Bot posting unrelated spam in a DP thread and going unpunished.

Right, 143 million Russians concern me a lot more than 1.4 BILLION Chinese as China can destroy us without firing a shot and we can destroy Russia and China militarily but not China economically.

What a joke you radicals are, buying rhetoric and never thinking with the brain

 

[Conservative]

I don't apologize for Trump. I don't even Trump. I didn't vote for him in 2016, and I won't vote for him in 2020.

I do agree with some of his policies, however, and I also disagree with the slavish way in which Democrats attack him no matter what, so I make that clear in my comments here.

Unlike many supposed "conservatives" and "liberals," I'm actually able to form my own opinions about each separate issue, without having them spoon fed to me by a single political party.

Thank you for an honest post that won't resonate with many in this forum. I respect your opinion, don't agree with it but at least it is civil, accurate, and not filled with hate rhetoric. you are being honest and that is something anti Trump posters cannot do. I respect that, don't agree with your non Trump vote but respect the honest comments

 

[Noodlegawd]

I was looking at President Trump's site on immigration. Show me where it has reasonable numbers for allow legal immigrants in. I didn't see it.
Trump's and Biden site both state broad objectives.

So what is a reasonable number for you on immigrants?

I didn't ask about Trump. I asked about Biden. Everybody here assumes that I'm a Trumper simply because I questioned their dear leaders. And they accuse Trumpers of being a cult. How funny.

I don't know what the reasonable number is. I'm not an expert on the issue. But I'm pretty sure we that we should have one, or at least some reasonable criteria to say when we can't reasonably take more people, and then have a way to stick to it. There's nothing even remotely suggesting such a thing on Biden's website.

 

[ClaraD]

I didn't ask about Trump. I asked about Biden. Everybody here assumes that I'm a Trumper simply because I questioned their dear leaders. And they accuse Trumpers of being a cult. How funny.

I don't know what the reasonable number is. I'm not an expert on the issue. But I'm pretty sure we that we should have one, or at least some reasonable criteria to say when we can't reasonably take more people, and then have a way to stick to it. There's nothing even remotely suggesting such a thing on Biden's website.

the plan was given to you, you ignored the link and didn't even bother to read it. The reason? Oh, because it doesn't fit the narrative and shows that your entire post was a waste of time and a lie.