• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What is Intelligence?

Intelligence is primarily...

  • 1) IQ test score and formal education

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 2) Problem solving and street smarts

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 3) General knowledge and common sense

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 4) Experience, maturity and wisdom

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • 5) Insight, imagination and artistry

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • All the above

    Votes: 8 72.7%

  • Other.. list your combo of numbers

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • Total voters
    11

grip

Light △ Bender
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 1, 2011
Messages
33,066
Reaction score
14,039
Location
FL - Daytona
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Who do you call smart?

Is an IQ test really accurate? I find everyone knows something, either thru experience or learning that others don't. Even children have wisdom. But what is considered really being a smart individual - education, memory, problem solving, critical thinking, quick wit, maturity, street smarts, shrewdness, common sense, general knowledge, wisdom, imagination, intuitive insight, artistic ability etc?

One of the most impressive skills I've seen is for someone to take a subject, especially a complicated one, and reduce it in simple layman terms to its central point. To do that, I believe you need a balance of all or most the traits listed above. Many of us have an amalgamation of these characteristics in varying levels, which gives us each our own unique intellect.

I sense that many believe that to simply accumulate information is equated with knowledge, analysis and intelligence, and though you need a certain amount, much of the unnecessary details of subjects can be found as quick as a Google.




 
Pretty much what wikipedia said and that means... the last option on your chart.


There are many kinds of intelligence and each one has to do with ones capacity to handle stuff. And a person can be intelligent in multiple ways.
So people who are "artistically intelligent" can handle artistically stuff.
People like me who are more analytic and more logical can handle that sort of stuff.
etc.

It's basically how your brain is wired.
 


I don't believe people realize how much overall intelligence also relies on the imagination. Einstein's IQ was supposedly 160, while the chess player Bobby Fischer's was 187. One had much more of an impact on the world than the other. Much like comparing Steve Jobs with Sharon Stone, though they had roughly similar IQ's. People's ability to apply their smarts in a field of expertise and have greater success isn't always an accurate measure.

I agree though that how we're wired or genetic traits, combined with drive, experiences, emotional stability and other characteristics has a lot to do with it. I've always believed that there were many people, who lived average lives, that may have had exceptional abilities that were never brought to light as a result of circumstances.
 

Yeah, that last part is especially true.



It's actually the norm. Most people I think, never realize what they want to do in life.
 
Intelligence is nothing but potential...someone who is intelligent has the potential to be "smart".
Intelligence is reasoning skills and focus...what is considered fluid and crystallized intelligence. IQ score does help measure intelligence but NOT formal education.... formal education gives you "smart"s/knowledge, nothing can give you intelligence....
 
Rainman05 said:
Yeah, that last part is especially true.



It's actually the norm. Most people I think, never realize what they want to do in life.
Click to expand...

One of the smartest people I ever knew, hid it on purpose. Much the opposite of many people who show off their knowledge. I asked him why he didn't express his intellect more and he said, "it's to my advantage for people to underestimate me."




Another good observation. Potential never realized is probably applicable to most people who've never been challenged properly to excel, especially in today's easier living standards.

Seems the answers are as variable as the definition to the question.
 
OP completely missed what is by far the best answer:

NATURE and NURTURE

i.e. the intelligence you are genetically endowed with plus (or multiplied by) the intelligence you gain from experience.

There are no other horses in the race.

It is a ridiculous omission. OP doesn't need to be starting any more polls if he is going to leave out something this big.
 
Inheritance/environment are another way of expressing nature/nurture and genes/environment.

And you had better not rest your case until the geneticists can shed a lot more light on the nature/genes side of the equation.
 

AFAIK, IQ has never been defined with much clarity but IMO, it's a lot like pornography - I know it when I see it, and I like both
 
I'd like to pick all of the above, since that partly covers the gist of it, but IQ tests are archaic.
 
USViking said:
Inheritance/environment are another way of expressing nature/nurture and genes/environment.

And you had better not rest your case until the geneticists can shed a lot more light on the nature/genes side of the equation.
Click to expand...

There hasn't been any broad DNA-linked intelligence studies done in recent years beause of racial prejudice.

These tests are just as taboo in the PC World as eating human flesh and raping small children.
 
Flamethrower said:
There hasn't been any broad DNA-linked intelligence studies done in recent years beause of racial prejudice.

These tests are just as taboo in the PC World as eating human flesh and raping small children.
Click to expand...
What part of your anatomy did you pull that out of?

Googling "scientific study intelligence dna" indicates study in the field is ongoing and extensive. See this, for example dated 17 April 2012:

Searching for Intelligence in Our Genes

(from link, emphasis added):

Here is something from the WSJ, dated 2/15/13:

A Genetic Code for Genius?

(from link, emphasis added):

And here is an older one dated 10/08 from the venerable Scientific American:

Searching for Intelligence in Our Genes

(from link, emphasis added, caution' paywall):

So it appears that the field is alive and well.
 

Sorry, but these tests avoid the taboos of testing a broad sampling of distinct racial groups. One just studied twins from Austrailia.

Any geneticist can tell you that it isn't one magical gene that gives extra intelligence---but many factors.

If there is a broad-based test that studies the IQ's of radomized major ethnic groups using uniform parameters like digit span tests, MRI's of the subjects and their DNA profiles---

---then let me know.
 
Flamethrower said:
Sorry, but these tests avoid the taboos of testing a broad sampling of distinct racial groups. One just studied twins from Austrailia.
Click to expand...
My first citation is bylined California which is about as multi-racial a place as there is. With a California sample size of over 20,000 they could not avoid obtaining representative data if they wanted to, and I would think the people conducting the research would make sure about the overall integrity of the sample, unless they are just quacks, or something.



Flamethrower said:
Any geneticist can tell you that it isn't one magical gene that gives extra intelligence---but many factors.
Click to expand...
Many researchers believe, or at least used to believe that there is a large general intelligence factor "G" in addition to specific types of intelligence. This seems at odds with the conclusions of the first link I posted, and it is an uncertainty of the type I had in mind when I said "you had better not rest your case until the geneticists can shed a lot more light on the nature/genes side of the equation."



Flamethrower said:
If there is a broad-based test that studies the IQ's of radomized major ethnic groups using uniform parameters like digit span tests, MRI's of the subjects and their DNA profiles---then let me know
Click to expand...
Mitochondrial and Y-chromosone DNA are now used to identify ancestry, including racial ancestry, with a high degree of confidence (the concept of Race remains contentious, however). My mere three google sites indicate that many thousands people are continuously under DNA/intelligence study now, and it will not be possible to hide the racial identification of the study subjects, as long as findings and data shared as they should be.
 
sangha said:
AFAIK, IQ has never been defined with much clarity but IMO, it's a lot like pornography - I know it when I see it, and I like both
Click to expand...

I think the past lack of clarity was an over emphasis on IQ scores. Intelligence seems to have two components:

- "Engine horse power" (Raw IQ score)
- "Transmission", the ability to apply the IQ score (ability to focus, self discipline, drive, orgainization, inituition, and in some cases, social skills etc.)

Van Basten said:
but IQ tests are archaic.
Click to expand...
I agree.

In the 1980s, IQ tests were the rage. They identified people with high horse power engines, but they could not answer why a fair number of people with high IQ scores had relatively mediocre performance in their chosen fields (poorly geared transmissions). Likewise,they failed to allow for the fact that a very efficient transmission can compensate to some degree for a relatively lower IQ score.

In the past say 15 year, the definition of true intelligence then seems to have been broadened to include having horse power and an efficient transmission. Thus, IQ tests have been de-emphasized. Aside from MENSA types- and I suspect more than a few of them have in-efficient transmissions, nobody really pays alot of attention to them anymore.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if anyone has stated this, but to me intelligence is the ability to solve problems. The degree of problem solving is directly related to one's level of intelligence.

Tim-
 
IQ from my observation is how quickly the human brain can process information as well recognize complex patterns that may be relevant in our environment. Psychologists used heavily in the past to predict ones future success in society, but IQ alone has proven to be not very accurate.

I'd imagine having a photographic memory with an IQ of 120 would be more beneficial in today's society than an IQ of 130 with a average memory.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Menu
Log in
Register
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…