Did this ever make it to SCOTUS? It can take decades to strike down anti-2nd amendment laws.
The 2nd Amendment right to bear arms.
There is a huge difference between a few bucks and the quadrupling of prices. Especially when nothing you've suggested saves anybody, but might also by disarming good people, cost lives.
Keep telling yourself that though :roll:
I am happy you feel the ban created no hardship!
How big of you, "screw your wallet and your rights, I want my way whether it will work or not, COMPLY DAMNIT". Yeah, how big of you.I don't give a rat's ass if the price go's up ten fold! That's not worth the life of one those school children that were killed.
And no one is being disarmed, most of the gun people on this thread have said for years that they believe there are only cosmetic differences so they can hardly claim hardship now.
I don't give a rat's ass if the price go's up ten fold! That's not worth the life of one those school children that were killed.
And no one is being disarmed, most of the gun people on this thread have said for years that they believe there are only cosmetic differences so they can hardly claim hardship now.
I don't give a rat's ass if the price go's up ten fold! That's not worth the life of one those school children that were killed.
And no one is being disarmed, most of the gun people on this thread have said for years that they believe there are only cosmetic differences so they can hardly claim hardship now.
if gun ownership was as popular with far left socialists as it is with conservatives do you really believe we'd see so much idiocy about guns coming from the far left?We don't get to chose between the two, but what we can do is demonstrate how ineffective your ideas are.
I guess you don't care about how such prohibitive prices disarm the poor, leaving them without adequate means of self defense.
How big of you, "screw your wallet and your rights, I want my way whether it will work or not, COMPLY DAMNIT". Yeah, how big of you.
You have no rights to assault weapons and hi cap mags, as we found out during the last federal ban.
Actually I do have rights to high capacity magazines, the whole part of "shall not be infringed" Illegitimate law doesn't change that. I don't have a right to "assault weapons" because they don't exist, however I do have a right to assault rifles, illegitimate laws notwithstanding. I don't expect you to understand any of this, it doesn't fit your agenda.You have no rights to assault weapons and hi cap mags, as we found out during the last federal ban.
Actually I do have rights to high capacity magazines, the whole part of "shall not be infringed" Illegitimate law doesn't change that. I don't have a right to "assault weapons" because they don't exist, however I do have a right to assault rifles, illegitimate laws notwithstanding. I don't expect you to understand any of this, it doesn't fit your agenda.
I had the right to own all the ones I owned.
You finally got something right, congrats! What I should have said was you had no right to purchase new AW and new hi cap mags in the USl
You haven't been right about anything yet. TD has been schooling you on this, as has the rest of us who don't like government pissants messing with our rights. Actually, come to think of it, more people have been harmed during the OWS protests than through firearms use, should we now reign in the right to redress of government and right to assemble guaranteed in the first? Maybe, yeah, if people assemble in their homes away from others who don't feel like putting up with their stupid crap we can say their rights to free speech and assembly haven't been abridged. Yeah, I like this, allow police to use all force available to them including deadly next time OWS or some other group that I don't like gets uppity, that way no one gets injured in the future when people become prohibited from assembly, but hey, if you can bitch in your house with your friends your rights still exist correct.You finally got something right, congrats! What I should have said was you had no right to purchase new AW and new hi cap mags in the USl
It took around 32 years for DC vs Heller to happen.It doesn't take decades to present a legal argument to the lower courts.
yet another lie from you. I bought many new ones too. they just cost more.
and right now I buy lots and lots. People like you made me 22,000 dollars in 1995-1997
thanks.
It took around 32 years for DC vs Heller to happen.
Where did you buy assault weapons and hi cap mags legally in the US during the ban?
And your point is? No one has proposed banning handguns. Apples do not equal oranges.
Shooters supply shop-loveland Ohio
Target World-Sharonville Ohio
One Shot-Newtown Ohio
and I bought stuff Diane Fineturd claimed were assault weapons but had changed a flash hider for a muzzlebreak and had a thumbhole stock rather than a pistol grip and those were Legal. Of course the minute the stupid law ended I converted those weapons back to how they should look. I have a few of those silly stocks if you want to buy them
many of us have been stocking up on AR 15 receivers, the one part you have to fill out a 4473 on. Most of us know how to fully build an AR-15 from scratch. and since the receiver was bought after the silly law was over but before your dream law passes (if it ever does) then I can build a bunch more and its gonna be impossible for some anti gun bureaucrat to prove when the gun was actually assembled since it on paper in 2009
Oh I know thousands upon thousands have been sold for such use
So, you say didn't buy new hi cap mags, just remaining stock that was grandfathered, and that the ban did not have much teeth. I'm willing to bet the ban will be more far reaching this time.
stop lying. every year one of the dem nutcases proposes a ban on handguns chicago and dc, cesspools of loony left thinking had such bans
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?