• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What In The Human Species Necessitates a God?


"with its own physical properties" what part of that statement you did not understand so you can beleive in multiple universe but a god or gods is extremly far fetch and what about black matter black holes white holes and that certain stars with just a spoon full of their matter is tons.
 
Since faith is so popular (sorry I can't think of a better term right now) it simply cannot be brushed under the carpet. I have been to church as a child perhaps five times and every time I felt out of place but I never scorned those that attended regularly because I simply have no answer. Because I will not listen to another person preach God does not prove there is no God. Those that argue against God are really arguieing against the definition or interpretation of God put forth by man. Frankly, the more I study the science of the universe I feel more and more complelled to believe in a creator of some kind. If one choses to define this creator as God so be it for that person. No one human knows what happened when whatever this is started. We do not know how, or why or even when exactly. So logically (I love that word), how can anyone claim to know the single truth? This thing we call "creation" is beyond our ability to grasp as a whole. We dont even know where it is going or where it is taking us. We live in the dark so we adopt theories, some religion and some stricly science and neither has yet to hold up to be the answer we all seek and most likely never will.
"The greatest trick the devil ever played is convincing people he does not exist."
 

Blacks holes? Known to exist. There's images out there from observatories. White holes? Logical conclusions due to black holes and the Einstein-Cartan minimal union between torsion tensors and Dirac spinors. This action would yield a repulsive spin that's quite significant in the highly-dense area. The matter that has passed the event horizon reaches a huge density and then rebounds, forming a ER bridge. The other side of the bridge (yes there are two sides) becomes a baby universe. This also becomes the idea that the Big Bang was simply a "Big Bounce."

Your spoonful of star weighing tons? You mean a neutron star and that thing called "density?" You realize weight is a gravity-dependent quantity, right? A neutron star's gravity is extraordinarily high.
 
Maybe you ought to rethink this line of attack.

Ehhh... no. I don't particularly feel like discussing whether or not god exists right now, but I do feel the need to stick up for the scientific method.

Affirmative assertions require evidence. You do not need to prove that something doesn't exist. You do need to prove that it does. I could assert that you are actually made of pudding. But there would be no reason to give credence to that assertion without evidence. I can't prove that the Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist, but there's no evidence that it does, so I can safely make decisions while relying on the idea that doesn't. Also, absence of evidence really is evidence of absence. There are no dodos around anymore. We know this not because there was a general memo from the Earth that dodos were now gone, but because there were dodos and now no longer are. There is no evidence that dodos are gone, but no evidence that they are still here. We conclude that dodos are extinct. We concluded the same about coelacanths, too, until evidence disproved that conclusion.

We conclude that Zeus and Ares don't exist because we climbed Mt. Olympus and no one was there. There is no physical evidence that leads to the conclusion "because this exists, Ares cannot", but a lack of evidence for Ares leads us to conclude that he doesn't exist.

So, no. There is nothing fallacious about the conclusion that god doesn't exist in the absence of evidence to support his existence. And the statement "god exists" does not require the same proof as "god doesn't exist." The former requires that evidence be discovered that can only be there due to the existence of god, whereas the latter merely requires showing that the evidence for the former is not genuine.

Let's take the Shroud of Turin as an example. It was put forth as evidence for the crucifixion of Jesus. Does this prove anything, though? It is merely a shroud that looks to be imprinted with the outline of a crucified man. Does it really demonstrate which man? Was it discovered in a tomb marked "Jesus of Nazareth"? No. All it really shows is that men were crucified, which we all already know. That the shroud was later tested and shown to only be about 700 or 800 years old further disqualifies it as evidence for any spiritual claims.

Your original post about god was actually a nonsequitor. This thread is asking about what in the human psyche would cause us to imagine gods. Its premise requires that god not exist. Unless you have evidence of a natural god radar in the human mind, the existence of god has no bearing on why humans would invent one. We are banned from asserting the nonexistence of god in religious forum threads. How about you show us the same respect and not derail this one any more than you have?
 
What In The Human Species Necessitates a God?

Hope.
 

Not all humans or even religions believe in god or gods. Buddhist follow a man and his teachings about the 4 noble truths and the 8 fold path to enlightenment. No god. The Chinese Confucianism was ethical teaching, again no god. The same with taoism, no god. A couple of tribes I worked with in Laos worshiped ancestors, asking for their protection, still no god. So it is not necessary for the human species to have or worship gods. But a god of this or that especially in the early years of mankind helped explain a lot of stuff the humans at that time didn't or couldn't understand.
 

Intelligence and curiosity.

Tiger's got to hunt
Bird's got to fly
Man got to sit and wonder why why why
Tiger got to sleep
Bird got to land
Man got to tell himself he understand


Religion and gods are a natural repercussion of intelligence and curiosity in a system where all the answers are not known.
 
Idols can take the place of gods too. Many people who aren't religious idolize material things, money, people, etc.... I think we all have our things that keep our hope alive.

 
How do you know there are no gods?

 
Well gee, has science ever been wrong?

Why would anyone want to "fight science" ? Science is a method to reveal reality and truth. Why would anyone want to "fight" it? Only the religious would.
 
Idols can take the place of gods too. Many people who aren't religious idolize material things, money, people, etc.... I think we all have our things that keep our hope alive.

That is a very good point. The U.S. has became a nation that idolizes commercialism and keeping up with the Jones.
 
Evidence for this?

That is literally the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

hope
/hōp/
Noun
A feeling of expectation and desire for a certain thing to happen.


Get a clue.
 
Believing in a higher power makes a hole for your intellect to leak through. (See how that works?)
 
That is literally the dumbest thing I've ever heard.

hope
/hōp/
Noun
A feeling of expectation and desire for a certain thing to happen.


Get a clue.

I wasn't aware a definition was evidence. Hmm. I guess unicorns, leprechauns, and "gods" all exist, then.
 
If you don't believe in a higher power you have a hole that needs filling. Be careful what you fill it with.

Weird. I am completely unaware of this supposed hole. Even IF there was some hole that is in need of filling, there is no way that unsubstantiated fluff would be able to fill it for me. Believing in a higher power would create an overriding gnawing feeling that I was deceiving myself.

So why is that I should fill an imperceptible hole with imperceptible fluff? It really does not matter, this is rhetorical, I could not do it even if I tried - my mind simply would not let me.
 
Believing in a higher power makes a hole for your intellect to leak through. (See how that works?)

It also gives you the power of positive thinking, or iow, gives you an advantage, as mind and will can overcome obstacles that otherwise seem unsurmountable. (See how that works? )
 

We are designed with a hole wear God is supposed to go and nature abhors a vacuum. You have filled that hole with something, ask yourself what.
 

I think you are discounting the human propensity for creativity, intuition, and awareness of concepts other than the physical and concrete. Iow, I don't think it requires a group to listen and follow, to believe that something exists outside of our five senses. Did man create God? I can't say with certainty, but I can say that I believe there's more than meets the eye. If I'm wrong, it doesn't hurt a thing.
 
I wasn't aware a definition was evidence. Hmm. I guess unicorns, leprechauns, and "gods" all exist, then.

Most religions are called faith. If faith in god helps one to become a better person, I have no problem with it. I do not think anyone else should either. There are enough evil and bad people in this world, we do not need to take something away from someone that helps them lead a good life.
 
We are designed with a hole wear God is supposed to go and nature abhors a vacuum. You have filled that hole with something, ask yourself what.

LOL. that is all
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…