What happens if Biden is found unfit before November?

[smallvoice]

The country has always relied on leadership from the top during crises, such as wars and terrorist attacks, well this is another attack and there is no leadership this time, because the man is incapable of it. I agree that a portion of the country is stupid for not wearing masks like the president isn't. Who are those people again? :roll:

We got along fine with no leadership from the "Community Organizer" so what's your problem now?

 

[smallvoice]

President Pence.

I can live with that. He would be an improvement over any "progressive".

 

[Acadia]

Is he scheduled to debate with Trump? I haven't been following the news about that.

Biden and his representatives are signalling "yes" to debates, but they won't move them up. Meanwhile, voting by mail...

 

[Velvet Elvis]

Biden is not selecting his VP. The DNC is. They are carefully selecting who it will be.

That way, once elected, they can immediately deem Biden unfit to hold office, impeach him, then their Manchurian Candidate will be in charge to blindly take orders from Nancy Pelosi and the Swamp. Bernie Sanders still has his marbles, so they couldn't use him. That's why the primaries were rigged against him. Biden HAD to win.

 

[Puigb]

Biden is not selecting his VP. The DNC is. They are carefully selecting who it will be.

That way, once elected, they can immediately deem Biden unfit to hold office, impeach him, then their Manchurian Candidate will be in charge to blindly take orders from Nancy Pelosi and the Swamp. Bernie Sanders still has his marbles, so they couldn't use him. That's why the primaries were rigged against him. Biden HAD to win.

Cool story bro.

And long as Trump and his swamp thugs are out of office and no longer urinating all over the nation, that's good in my book.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Only 4 states have fines or prosecutions.

In 37 other states electors can vote for anybody they choose even though they are supposedly "pledged."

No “supposedly” to it. The faithless electors were chosen by their parties and appointed to their roles as electors based on their word/pledge.

If I can freely vote for anyone I choose (without consequences) it is nonsense to call that being bound except in name only.

What’s nonsense is you dismissing the electors obligation to vote as they pledged.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

President Pence.

Nooooooooo!!

 

[azgreg]

Biden is not selecting his VP. The DNC is. They are carefully selecting who it will be.

That way, once elected, they can immediately deem Biden unfit to hold office, impeach him, then their Manchurian Candidate will be in charge to blindly take orders from Nancy Pelosi and the Swamp. Bernie Sanders still has his marbles, so they couldn't use him. That's why the primaries were rigged against him. Biden HAD to win.

 

[iguanaman]

We got along fine with no leadership from the "Community Organizer" so what's your problem now?

Obama did not cause us to get 22% of the worlds deaths with 4% of the world's population. We are not used to being #1.......in DEATHS from an infectious disease that most of the world has handled much better than us. It reminds me of when GW Bush was hawking Billions in no money down home loans for minorities. Bush had no plan then either. That was just our money and time though. This time they are coming for our lives...and we are not going to let Trump have them so beware. Only 87 day left until the madness ends.

 

[Gator]

No “supposedly” to it. The faithless electors were chosen by their parties and appointed to their roles as electors based on their word/pledge.


What’s nonsense is you dismissing the electors obligation to vote as they pledged.

I don't dismiss it, I am just recognizing reality that electors do not have to vote as pledged; therefore, the pledge is useless.

Claiming they are "bound" implies they must vote for that candidate when we both know that is not true. Attempting to explain how the system works as the electors being bound completely distorts reality and misleads the person trying to understand it. Stick with reality--they pledge to support that candidate but are still free to voter as they choose; thus the term "faithless elector."

Some states with open primaries include a pledge on the ballot that "I am a (Democrat or Republican) and pledge to support the nominees of this party" or similar language.
Those voters who vote in that party's primary also pledge to support that party but can vote for any party they choose in the general election. Another useless pledge.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

I don't dismiss it, I am just recognizing reality that electors do not have to vote as pledged; therefore, the pledge is useless.

Claiming they are "bound" implies they must vote for that candidate when we both know that is not true. Attempting to explain how the system works as the electors being bound completely distorts reality and misleads the person trying to understand it. Stick with reality--they pledge to support that candidate but are still free to voter as they choose; thus the term "faithless elector."

Some states with open primaries include a pledge on the ballot that "I am a (Democrat or Republican) and pledge to support the nominees of this party" or similar language.
Those voters who vote in that party's primary also pledge to support that party but can vote for any party they choose in the general election. Another useless pledge.

You might as well stop trying. You lost the debate many posts ago.

Now that SCOTUS has ruled on the matter of faithless electors, hopefully states will begin putting real teeth in their laws.

 

[Gator]

You might as well stop trying. You lost the debate many posts ago.

Now that SCOTUS has ruled on the matter of faithless electors, hopefully states will begin putting real teeth in their laws.

You sound like Charlie Sheen---"winning"

delusion---"an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder."

 

[RaleBulgarian]

You sound like Charlie Sheen---"winning"

delusion---"an idiosyncratic belief or impression that is firmly maintained despite being contradicted by what is generally accepted as reality or rational argument, typically a symptom of mental disorder."

Very ironic that you post the above, considering the fact that you have done nothing but deny reality throughout our conversation.

 

[Gaius46]

Allow me to translate "Deep State" into a terms you'll understand: Entrenched Washington Bureaucracy. The Corporatocracy. High dollar Washington lobbyists.......now do you understand?

This is hysterically funny. You elected a billionaire whose golf buddies l ARE the swamp you’re talking about. And you expected him to “drain” it. Laughable.

 

[Gaius46]

Biden can't even string along a full paragraph. You (and the corrupt media) know this. President Trump can't wait to debate Biden. The Democrats are petrified of the thought of Joe Biden on the debate stage with a boss like Trump.

Cranky Joe declines a cognitive test duel with Trump | Newsday

Pot meet kettle. Trump is the worst extemporaneous speaker I think I’ve ever seen.

And he doesn’t debate. He insults. I grew up in Queens not far from him and his debate performance reminds me of us in 8th grade hanging out in the park.

 

[Gaius46]

Did he or did he not take the cognitive test? If so, did he pass it?

That's the only important detail there: the RESULT!

Oh yeah the test with the hard last five questions according to Trump anyway. An 8 year old can pass it. All it basically proves is that his brain is functioning.

You need to set the bar a little higher.

 

[Gaius46]

Biden is not selecting his VP. The DNC is. They are carefully selecting who it will be.

That way, once elected, they can immediately deem Biden unfit to hold office, impeach him, then their Manchurian Candidate will be in charge to blindly take orders from Nancy Pelosi and the Swamp. Bernie Sanders still has his marbles, so they couldn't use him. That's why the primaries were rigged against him. Biden HAD to win.

You really have no clue how impeachment works do you?

Here’s a hint - the DNC has nothing to do with it.

 

[Gator]

Very ironic that you post the above, considering the fact that you have done nothing but deny reality throughout our conversation.

Reality is that an elector can vote for any person they choose despite any pledge they make.

 

[Gator]

Biden is not selecting his VP. The DNC is. They are carefully selecting who it will be.

That way, once elected, they can immediately deem Biden unfit to hold office, impeach him, then their Manchurian Candidate will be in charge to blindly take orders from Nancy Pelosi and the Swamp. Bernie Sanders still has his marbles, so they couldn't use him. That's why the primaries were rigged against him. Biden HAD to win.

And I thought Pizzagate was a wild conspiracy theory.

 

[RaleBulgarian]

Reality is that an elector can vote for any person they choose despite any pledge they make.

Tell that SCOTUS. :roll:

“The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously upheld laws across the country that remove or punish rogue Electoral College delegates who refuse to cast their votes for the presidential candidate they were pledged to support.”
Supreme Court: State 'Faithless Elector' Laws Constitutional : NPR

 

[Gator]

Tell that SCOTUS. :roll:

“The U.S. Supreme Court has unanimously upheld laws across the country that remove or punish rogue Electoral College delegates who refuse to cast their votes for the presidential candidate they were pledged to support.”

You are confusing what the Supreme Court said states can do constitutionally with what actually exists in most states today.

States are free to make laws removing or punishing faithless electors. States do not have to pass such laws. See the difference?

 

[RaleBulgarian]

You are confusing what the Supreme Court said states can do constitutionally with what actually exists in most states today.

States are free to make laws removing or punishing faithless electors. States do not have to pass such laws. See the difference?

What I see is you feebly trying to extricate your foot from your own mouth, but only shoving it further in.

Do yourself a favor, Gator, and quit now while you only look moderately stupid.

 

[Gator]

What I see is you feebly trying to extricate your foot from your own mouth, but only shoving it further in.

Do yourself a favor, Gator, and quit now while you only look moderately stupid.

I see you have trouble admitting I am right despite your attempt to quibble over technicalities while ignoring reality.

 

[tres borrachos]

Anyone who votes for Biden is a racist.
Forget about what he said recently regarding the black community not being diverse or black enough if they don’t vote for him.
Look at his policies.

Unwilling to reopen schools
Against school choice
Open the borders
Defund the police
Supports BLM which wants to dismantle the family unit.

All of these policies and beliefs hurt the black communities.

The family unit? Wut?

 

[tres borrachos]

Biden is not selecting his VP. The DNC is. They are carefully selecting who it will be.

That way, once elected, they can immediately deem Biden unfit to hold office, impeach him, then their Manchurian Candidate will be in charge to blindly take orders from Nancy Pelosi and the Swamp. Bernie Sanders still has his marbles, so they couldn't use him. That's why the primaries were rigged against him. Biden HAD to win.

Congratulations. You managed to post multiple breathtakingly stupid things in a single post.