• Please read the Announcement concerning missing posts from 10/8/25-10/15/25.
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What do you think of the War of Northern Attrition?

My brain can’t get over @NoahUSA claiming that the Southern white supremacist slavers didn’t strip African slaves of their culture, history, and symbols.

Like bro, have you never seen Roots?

“Your name is Toby!” *whip crack*
“Kunta Kinte!” *whip crack*
“Your name is Toby!!!”
 
Our Founding Fathers obviously did an excellent job with our federal Constitution, we can't do a better job today.

Most of our problems stem from the moral turpitude of not faithfully executing what They ordained and established for ourselves and our Posterity.
 
Ok to demonstrate, put yourself in the shoes of a slave. Since the op thinks the only thing wrong with slavery is that it was racial. Imagine jeff bezos being the master that bought you.

Do you have a sister? Brother? Younger nephew?

The current status of wealth distribution in society is leading to few companies owning vast swaths of the economy and setting the terms of how that wealth is being used which is making upward mobility more difficult.

Jeff Bezos buys your sister and now owns your sister as livestock. You are never able to see your sister again because Jeff Bezos now owns her and can ship her off to his private island in say the carribean. You will never be able to write to her, she will never be able to see you.

Would you accept this? If you say no then you understand why “defending their property rights” is indefensible.
 
Agreed, the southern states never would have joined the union if they had know they weren't allowed to leave. they were deceived by the USA and everyone they considered family in the North that opposed their right to self government.

Oh poor baby. Was going to eat to maintain and extend slavery really that important to you?
 
Ok to demonstrate, put yourself in the shoes of a slave. Since the op thinks the only thing wrong with slavery is that it was racial. Imagine jeff bezos being the master that bought you.

Do you have a sister? Brother? Younger nephew?

The current status of wealth distribution in society is leading to few companies owning vast swaths of the economy and setting the terms of how that wealth is being used which is making upward mobility more difficult.

Jeff Bezos buys your sister and now owns your sister as livestock. You are never able to see your sister again because Jeff Bezos now owns her and can ship her off to his private island in say the carribean. You will never be able to write to her, she will never be able to see you.

Would you accept this? If you say no then you understand why “defending their property rights” is indefensible.
If thats what happens its what happens
 
Fun thread. Getting it all out in the open.
 
If thats what happens its what happens
So you would accept Jeff Bezos buying your sister if you have one or your parents and treat them like a cow? You would accept this to preserve hierarchy? You have no spine.
 
You truly know nothing in regards to the subject. Neither one of them was tried for treason. if they had been they would have been executed. Go back and read my quote, it will give you insight into your ignorance and how destructive it can be.
The only reason the traitors weren't tried is that the Johnson administration felt that it would impede reconciliation. So, keep talking about ignorance.
 
So you would accept Jeff Bezos buying your sister if you have one or your parents and treat them like a cow? You would accept this to preserve hierarchy? You have no spine.
Id be at the top so my family would not be affected negatively.
 
Id be at the top so my family would not be affected negatively.
:ROFLMAO:. You just said you would be ok with someone buying a member of your family and treating them as cattle. Do you have a death wish?
 
Id be at the top so my family would not be affected negatively.

This is the mindset of every fascist on the planet.

“I’m okay with it because I’d be the oppressor not the oppressee”

You have the same morality as a Nazi.
 
Id be at the top so my family would not be affected negatively.

What message are you trying to convey by showing the flag of a nation that was formed primarily for the specific purpose of maintaining and extending the scourge of slavery?
 
I find it interesting that those who dwell on the loss of the Civil War by the South never seem to state that slavery & racism are unacceptable. I can't help but wonder whether or not they want to bring back slavery.

What I'd like to implore for everyone to do is pressure them to state one way or another where they stand with slavery & racism; pressure them & demand from them that they be upfront about their position on slavery.
 
This is the mindset of every fascist on the planet.

“I’m okay with it because I’d be the oppressor not the oppressee”

You have the same morality as a Nazi.
The only morality a fascist has is might makes right.
 
And to think this guy is not the most greedy person on this forum? To steal the labor and the fruits of and become a parasite? Isnt greed a deadly sin?
 
I find it interesting that those who dwell on the loss of the Civil War by the South never seem to state that slavery & racism are unacceptable. I can't help but wonder whether or not they want to bring back slavery.

What I'd like to implore for everyone to do is pressure them to state one way or another where they stand with slavery & racism; pressure them & demand from them that they be upfront about their position on slavery.
I am an old southerner......I will tell you that the majority of southerners are white supremacists.......most have the good sense to keep it to themselves and their immediate peer groups and live in peace......but there is little association between black and white outside of work or school......most just don't like to be around each other....white and black.....and as free men guaranteed the civil rights of our Constitution this is our right to do so......and THAT is the crux of this discussion imo.......slavery was wrong period.....the Civil War was inevitable.....it could never have been won by the South on the battlefields..... slavery had to be abolished ......the Constitution and the Bill of Rights clearly defines the reasons.....today's extremist white supremacists are the vocal edge of the fact that so many cannot accept equality....and that is pure and simple ignorance that has and does result in these pathetic never ending discussions....it will take many more generations for us to evolve beyond this
 
You truly know nothing in regards to the subject. Neither one of them was tried for treason. if they had been they would have been executed. Go back and read my quote, it will give you insight into your ignorance and how destructive it can be.
And for that you should give thanks to the mercy extended by Lincoln and Grant in sparing their Civil War counterparts from trial and execution. Which otherwise from that could easily have happened. And in retrospect probably should've happened.
 
You can't teach someone who refuses to learn.



Star of the West was fired upon by South Carloina shore batteries on January 9, 1861. January is before April is it not? Buchanan was still in office.

My statement "Provocation came when South Carolina fired on a federal chartered steamer supplying Ft Sumter before Lincoln was in office" is correct.

Learn history.



And you were already wrong.

South Carolina ceded Ft Sumter to the United States in 1805.

Learn history.

Your citation of the Star of the West is just another dodge to try to prove greater culpability for the South. Of course Buchanan didn't declare war over that; he's on his way out, let the new guy worry about it. Lincoln COULD have immediately declared war on the South for their firing on that ship. Why didn't he? If you claim to know history, let's hear your flimsy excuse. Having seen that the South was willing to take up arms, why did he continue to provoke them by sending supplies to Sumter?

The 1805 contract was obviously cancelled by the new game in town. Learn to think.
 
Thanks for agreeing that the south started the war and all fault for hostilities lay at their feet
Thanks for continually misreading posts so that no one with a brain takes you or your side seriously.
 
Back
Top Bottom