• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

What causes mass shootings?

Voters want to regulate guns because of mass shootings.

  • early childhood trauma

    Votes: 12 60.0%
  • exposure to violence at a young age

    Votes: 10 50.0%
  • parental suicide

    Votes: 10 50.0%
  • physical or sexual abuse

    Votes: 12 60.0%
  • the shooters all had the means to carry out their plans

    Votes: 13 65.0%
  • domestic violence

    Votes: 10 50.0%
  • severe bullying

    Votes: 14 70.0%
  • a specific grievance against their "enemies"

    Votes: 16 80.0%
  • relationship rejection. divorce, etc

    Votes: 15 75.0%
  • studying the actions of other shooters (more of a symptom)

    Votes: 8 40.0%

  • Total voters
    20
I'd take the knifeman.
i prefer not to interact with armed nutters. i don't have much of a problem with armed non-nutters. i've done some target shooting with a number of them.
 
i prefer not to interact with armed nutters. i don't have much of a problem with armed non-nutters. i've done some target shooting with a number of them.


Me too, but if I was a tourist in say New York Times Square, and a psychotic terrorist burst on the scene hell bent on taking as many lives as he could...

....I would prefer that he be armed with an edged weapon than with a firearm.
 
Me too, but if I was a tourist in say New York Times Square, and a psychotic terrorist burst on the scene hell bent on taking as many lives as he could...

....I would prefer that he be armed with an edged weapon than with a firearm.
yeah, i guess i agree with that, though i prefer to not be around violent people ever. life is hard enough without them.
 
All mass shooting have only one thing in common. Gun(s).

Well, thanks Captain Obvious. What's the rest of your thought? "All mass shootings have only one thing in common -- guns. Therefore,.............................." what?
 
Voters want to regulate guns because of mass shootings.

Well, what causes mass shooters?

you can post your own reasons down below


.
None of the above.

A person shooting at a bunch of people causes mass shootings.

Your poll question should have been "what causes a person to be a mass murderer.

This thread is also in the wrong forum
 
Well, thanks Captain Obvious. What's the rest of your thought? "All mass shootings have only one thing in common -- guns. Therefore,.............................." what?
Notice he didn't care about bombings or mass murder involving crashing trucks or airplanes.

You can murder all you like as long as you don't use a gun.
 
Well, thanks Captain Obvious. What's the rest of your thought? "All mass shootings have only one thing in common -- guns. Therefore,.............................." what?
The shooter might actually be better off using a crossbow. No noise, so it would be a while before people realized what was happening.
 
The shooter might actually be better off using a crossbow. No noise, so it would be a while before people realized what was happening.
The only problem is it doesn't shoot very fast. Reloading that thing unlike changing a magazine would offer ample time for a bum rush.
 
If you had a bullet and a shooter and victims and no gun, what would happen?

Not a mass shooting.

If you had bullets and a firearm but no person around who wanted to use the firearm to harm others, what would happen? Nothing.
 
If you had bullets and a firearm but no person around who wanted to use the firearm to harm others, what would happen? Nothing.
Lol he didn't make a very good argument. If there were no guns there would be no killings with guns.

That's why what if arguments aren't valid.

There are guns so the point is moot.
 
Lol he didn't make a very good argument. If there were no guns there would be no killings with guns.

That's why what if arguments aren't valid.

There are guns so the point is moot.
If there are no bullets for the gun, essentially the gun is a paperweight.
 
yeah, i guess i agree with that, though i prefer to not be around violent people ever. life is hard enough without them.

Sadly terrorists and psychotic active shooters tend to seek out places where innocent people congregate, like schools, churches and tourist attractions.
 
Voters want to regulate guns because of mass shootings.

Well, what causes mass shooters?

you can post your own reasons down below


.
Rage coupled with access to guns equals mass shooting.
 
The only problem is it doesn't shoot very fast. Reloading that thing unlike changing a magazine would offer ample time for a bum rush.
One would think so.
Why is it that the shooters can change magazines, and the intended victims don't rush him and take him down?
 
Hmmm, I see that mixing alcohol with armed citizens doesn't help.

Gotta say, that was one dumb law-change.
 
Hmmm, I see that mixing alcohol with armed citizens doesn't help.

Gotta say, that was one dumb law-change.

Right, because no one ever brought a gun into a bar before that.
 
Right, because no one ever brought a gun into a bar before that.
There's a difference between a rogue carrier and a law making it OK for everyone to do it. I guess you fail to see that. No surprise there.
 
One would think so.
Why is it that the shooters can change magazines, and the intended victims don't rush him and take him down?
I was being sarcastic a magazine change doesn't take long enough for someone to bum rush them they have to fumble with it, and you'd have to know that. It'd be much better if when you're doing your magazine change this one can shoot back at you.
 
I was being sarcastic a magazine change doesn't take long enough for someone to bum rush them they have to fumble with it, and you'd have to know that. It'd be much better if when you're doing your magazine change this one can shoot back at you.
Theoretically, that's a possibility. Has it ever happened?
 
Back
Top Bottom