• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every persons position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!
  • Welcome to our archives. No new posts are allowed here.

What About Alaska

A

AleXXander

Alaska Would Be More at Home in Russia




Sell Alaska to Russia? Damn what a heck!!! Has the US come down that low that is ready to trade its territories? St. Pearlstein says it's economically sound but wait do we measure everything from financial viewpoint. Does he and other highbrows not really realize that the US - proudly a single super-state in the world - is now in the pillory? Does Mr Pearlstein not really follow the course? We were f'cked up there in the Central Asia and kicked out from the region where America was dominating since long ago! Was it not really enough? Do we want more? Now, sell Alaska and what? I wonder. Did Mr. Pearlstein know that Alaska is a key strategic area - Pacific military bases and ABM systems deployed there to deter potential aggressors like China and North Korea. We sell Alaska and kiss off Pacific dominance. Mind this.
 

Kandahar

Enemy Combatant
DP Veteran
Joined
Jul 20, 2005
Messages
20,688
Reaction score
7,319
Location
Washington, DC
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
I think he was being facetious. Russia certainly doesn't have a trillion dollars to buy Alaska, and they're going to have enough trouble hanging on to Siberia in the coming decades.

It might be a good idea to revoke Alaska's statehood (which might require a constitutional amendment), and/or let it be some kind of autonomous protectorate of the United States. This would be better for Alaska for the reasons the writer mentions (it would let Alaskans run their economy as they want to, rather than as Washington wants them to). It would also be better for the United States for the reason the writer mentions (if Alaskan representatives want to spend money frivolously, they can spend their OWN constituents' money).
 

shinigami_axel

New member
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
Alaska is cool, and there are so many other states that should be sold first.
 
Top Bottom