Were the Leftists on DP, those who claimed Biden was mentally capable of being president, duped or were they fundamentally dishonest?

[Luce]

Nope. It's not. Things have changed, and not for the better. Time to change it BACK.

Back from what? To when?

 

[StarvedForChange]

How so? Last evening, it was 230 Democrats who voted NO, and against keeping the government running.

Gaslighting. 40 Republicans voted against it as well.

The Democrats were ready to vote for a Mike Johnson-backed bill until Trump tanked it. Trump needs to back a better bill.

 

[trixare4kids]

I don’t need to read an opinion article in the WSJ filled with allegations. That you childishly need to stoop to low personal insults against Biden based on rumors and allegations reveals your bias. Biden has accomplishments, and that is a fact.

Most of us educate ourselves and read verified sourcing. Today's WSJ account is one of them.
Nothing childish about learning the truth about a very diminished Joe Biden presidency being shielded by his handlers.

 

[trixare4kids]

Gaslighting. 40 Republicans voted against it as well.

The Democrats were ready to vote for a Mike Johnson-backed bill until Trump tanked it. Trump needs to back a better bill.

A simple mathematical question. Which is the greater number of opposers? 230 or 40?

 

[devildavid]

Most of us educate ourselves and read verified sourcing. Today's WSJ account is one of them.
Nothing childish about learning the truth about a very diminished Joe Biden presidency being shielded by his handlers.

The WSJ also prints articles of editorial opinion, like any other source. They presented no facts and no truth about Biden.

 

[dandolo2k]

We didn't want to use actual money.

U mean of course "US Dollar" ?

 

[Luce]

U mean of course "US Dollar" ?

Or Euros. Or Yen. Or Pounds.

Real money. Not that buttwipe You People use.

 

[eohrnberger]

I'm not in denial of anything, since I'm not the one completely misrepresenting what Pelosi said, which I already pointed out to you numerous times. What you've posted is just factually incorrect. Now if you said her description was a projection of Dems/Libs/Progs/Marxists/Fascists/Pinko Commies et al strategies, then at least you'd be in a better ball park,

The word 'projection' has been in my posts referring to Pelosi's apparently inadvertent confession of their use of the tactic she describes.

though then you'd have to make that case of this being something exclusive to one party, which it is not.

It's not what she said though. Another attempt at accuracy on your part would be to state this is your interpretation of what she said. Odd you don't do that and insist on being factually incorrect.

This statement is denial that the Dem's, Lib's, and Prog's have their complicit MSM which they've used to in the 'Wrap Up Smear' tactic. Examples of this abound.
Why are you denying this? Its in the public record.

With the Dem's, Lib's and Prog's, every accusation is a confession of that which they are guilty of.

 

[dandolo2k]

Or Euros. Or Yen. Or Pounds.

Real money. Not that buttwipe You People use.

"Or Euros. Or Yen. Or Pounds." this is what is NOT a real money. Heading to the status of toilet paper. Once again you are living in some paralell world.

 

[Luce]

"Or Euros. Or Yen. Or Pounds." this is what is NOT a real money. Heading to the status of toilet paper. Once again you are living in some paralell world.

Yes. In my world, the sky is blue.

How about yours? I mean, if you don't count the smoke from your burning refineries.

 

[trouble13]

There seems to be near unanimous agreement on the answer to this question

 

[dandolo2k]

Yes. In my world, the sky is blue.

How about yours? I mean, if you don't count the smoke from your burning refineries.

I don't see any smoke from "burning refineries".
But I have seen this:

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/12/20/europe/one-killed-russian-missile-attack-kyiv-intl/index.html

Looks impressing ?

 

[Luce]

A simple mathematical question. Which is the greater number of opposers? 230 or 40?

So what?

 

[Luce]

I don't see any smoke from "burning refineries".
But I have seen this:

View attachment 67547797

Looks impressing ?

Ah, murdering civilians again, I see.

 

[dandolo2k]

Ah, murdering civilians again, I see.

IS "burning refinaries" better then "murdering civilians" ? ANyway you may quite well understand that there is a "cause and effect relationship" betwen events.
And you may pretty well assume that the refinaries, which are hit by your American ATASMS, are also not without civilians who serve in these refinaries .

 

[trouble13]

Biden was an excellent president. Remember everybody predicted (and some hoped for) a recession? Didn't happen. Stock market set records. Unemployment very low. Interest rates dropping.

Interest rates are still higher then what he inherited from Trump. He will likely leave office that way. How is that something you tout as a success?

His unemployment numbers are mostly low thanks to the massive expansion of gov jobs. I'm not sure if would call that a good thing.

The claim of a recession or not is highly debatable. Using the commonly accepted standard we did indeed go into a recession but using the narrowly defined one they used they avoided their depressed economy as being categorized as a fecession by the skun of their teeth.

The stockmarket did do well. Bidens presidency did benefit the rich, which i am told by the left is a bad thing. Apparently if they do well everyone else does poorly or so they say.

 

[hecatmoggie]

or were they fundamentally dishonest like the media they revere?

everyone - and I mean EVERYONE - has known for 9-12 months Biden was senile

I don't think liberals will admit it until after he's out of office - but they know it, everyone knows it

 

[nota bene]

Many of them proudly declared they would vote for a steaming pile of shit with a D next to it over Trump. No...they werent deluded'...they knew all along. They didnt care.

Mind you these are the same people that blindly supported the Biden administration ****ing up everything it touched, and that today are hoping that Trump fails, no matter how badly it might impact the country. Picture a bunch of people in a raft punching holes in the raft laughing and shouting "SINK, MOTHER****ER!!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!"

Someone just today posted to me that he would have voted for Karen Ann Quinlan before he voted for Trump, so you may have a point. Or more.

 

[trixare4kids]

The WSJ also prints articles of editorial opinion, like any other source. They presented no facts and no truth about Biden.

The article is not an editorial opinion, so, your concession is noted.

 

[trixare4kids]

everyone - and I mean EVERYONE - has known for 9-12 months Biden was senile

I don't think liberals will admit it until after he's out of office - but they know it, everyone knows it

Those who truly detest Trump will be the group who will never admit it even when Biden's out of office. That's just the way it goes, and I end by asking, who cares?

 

[Jason Warfield]

Scoring political points again,I see.

Just another Biden Derangement Syndrome poll made by a MAGA snowflake.

 

[tshade]

Those in the Oval Office are skilled liars. Don't you even care to know who was really running the country in the big guy's mental/physical absence? Who is in charge? Who?

conspiracy theories don't cut it in a debate

Trump has nothing to do with the WH clown car still scamming the country. Biden should never have run for the presidency, and many from that car are still scamming you.

Biden is ranked 19th historically----------Trump is 47th

POT KETTLE BLACK to you

 

[ElChupacabra]

The word 'projection' has been in my posts referring to Pelosi's apparently inadvertent confession of their use of the tactic she describes.

Yet not in the one I quoted, which is why I called it out.

This statement is denial that the Dem's, Lib's, and Prog's have their complicit MSM which they've used to in the 'Wrap Up Smear' tactic. Examples of this abound.
Why are you denying this? Its in the public record.

It isn't, and by a long shot. You're reaching on this one, and badly.

With the Dem's, Lib's and Prog's, every accusation is a confession of that which they are guilty of.

I suppose the same can be said of the things GOP/MAGA supporters complain about.

 

[eohrnberger]

Yet not in the one I quoted, which is why I called it out.

It isn't, and by a long shot. You're reaching on this one, and badly.

I see I need to refresh your memory with 'the list'. OK.

Here's a small list of the Dem's MSM propaganda push narratives, i.e. either part in the 'Wrap Up Smear'.

• 'The Steel dossier is real'?
• 'Hunter's laptop was Russia disinformation'?
• 'Inject bleach'?
• 'Joe's just fine'?
• 'Joe's on top of his game'?
• 'Russian Collusion'?
• 'Trump's a Russian asset'?
• The assassination attempt was staged.
• Trump was not actually injured by a bullet or at all.
• the “Muslim ban” that wasn’t?
• the mantra that the 2017 tax cuts were only for the “rich”
• the Ukraine impeachment of Trump, a creative fiction based on a complaint from an anonymous member of the swamp who never testified
• The Capitol Hill riot on Jan. 6 was an “armed insurrection”
• President Trump referred to Nazis and White supremacists as “very fine people.”
• President Trump “incited” the riot
• President Trump wanted to End NATO
• The border is secure
• Don't say gay laws
• Jim Crow 2.0
• Inflation is transitory
• Trump is a fascist
• Violent crime is falling

Wake up and smell the coffee. The Dem's MSM propagandists require that you do, and you should.

I suppose the same can be said of the things GOP/MAGA supporters complain about.

Let me know when you believe that the Dem's MSM propagandists push one on behalf of Republicans. Then we'll talk about this again.

 

[antiquity]

Back to what year, Corbell?

January 20th 2025.