BrettNortje
Banned
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2016
- Messages
- 793
- Reaction score
- 22
- Location
- Cape Town
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
I have managed to make many theoretical weapons in my time, and revised the way gun powder is made, making it either more powerful or cheaper, of course. now, i want to continue making weapons, just through i would start with a 'lepton gun,' yes?
Why a lepton gun? well, lepton's have negative spin, so they eat away at matter. this is true for all negative spin particles as they balance themselves out with quarks and 'positive spin things.' this means that creating an imbalance somewhere between the balance is the same as sparking a fire.
If we were to observe that projecting a stream of leptons at a target might be cheap, we could contain the ammunition in batteries that pop out like a shotgun, no doubt being able to fit many into a clip. the question is, should it be a long range sniper weapon like the world is looking for, or an assault rifle the world also seeks?
So, leptons are the smallest particles, which means they have less mass. projectiles are mass added to acceleration, yes? i mean, if it is heavier, it could carry further - take a leaf and a stone? i suggest we make a automatic weapon out of this, like an uzzi - a 'moderate force weapon.'
Then, we could stick the leptons and other particles into the 'battery.' this would see us having the whole particle, as, the lepton will not survive without the other 'dead mass.' engineering this synthetically or in man made ways might be hard work, so i suggest for the sake of costs that we just jam a lot of molecules into it. we could then ignite the lepton for travel by electromagnetism, which , we have mastered quite a while ago. this could mean the electrons are the main force behind this, along with magnetism. this means we should use electromagnetism to jolt into the 'battery clip' and then replace the leptons with the whole atom that follows it through like a hammer mechanism for a older pistol, yes?
Of course, we need the dead mass to separate from the live stuff and therefore we could push electrons and leptons in, and use magnetism to draw quarks out or backwards. this will result in a little bit of recoil, so the uzzi idea is the best bet, of course.
I have managed to make many theoretical weapons in my time, and revised the way gun powder is made, making it either more powerful or cheaper, of course. now, i want to continue making weapons, just through i would start with a 'lepton gun,' yes?
Why a lepton gun? well, lepton's have negative spin, so they eat away at matter. this is true for all negative spin particles as they balance themselves out with quarks and 'positive spin things.' this means that creating an imbalance somewhere between the balance is the same as sparking a fire.
If we were to observe that projecting a stream of leptons at a target might be cheap, we could contain the ammunition in batteries that pop out like a shotgun, no doubt being able to fit many into a clip. the question is, should it be a long range sniper weapon like the world is looking for, or an assault rifle the world also seeks?
So, leptons are the smallest particles, which means they have less mass. projectiles are mass added to acceleration, yes? i mean, if it is heavier, it could carry further - take a leaf and a stone? i suggest we make a automatic weapon out of this, like an uzzi - a 'moderate force weapon.'
Then, we could stick the leptons and other particles into the 'battery.' this would see us having the whole particle, as, the lepton will not survive without the other 'dead mass.' engineering this synthetically or in man made ways might be hard work, so i suggest for the sake of costs that we just jam a lot of molecules into it. we could then ignite the lepton for travel by electromagnetism, which , we have mastered quite a while ago. this could mean the electrons are the main force behind this, along with magnetism. this means we should use electromagnetism to jolt into the 'battery clip' and then replace the leptons with the whole atom that follows it through like a hammer mechanism for a older pistol, yes?
Of course, we need the dead mass to separate from the live stuff and therefore we could push electrons and leptons in, and use magnetism to draw quarks out or backwards. this will result in a little bit of recoil, so the uzzi idea is the best bet, of course.
See, now you've got me thinking about how many leptons are in that 230gr round I just sent down range.
Maybe we could carry a mass of negatively charged atoms by using electricity to carry it to 'a heat source,' like with the plasma ball, and then sending negative energy along these 'tendrils?' this will connect with the target through electromagnetism to keep it more or less on track, and then shoot the necessary things in particles or such to deteriorate and decay the target.
You do realize this isn't the make believe section of this forum correct. Virtually nothing you say is anything but fiction.
Actually, it is science fiction.
Which is still fiction.Actually, it is science fiction.
Which is still fiction.
More importantly this is still not the make believe section.
But you are not making anything. Ypu are just talking silliness.Maybe cell phones were make believe until someone 'helped' make them?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?