• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

We may finally see Trump’s tax returns, and Republicans are panicking

Rogue Valley

Lead or get out of the way
DP Veteran
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
94,370
Reaction score
82,753
Location
Barsoom
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Independent
We may finally see Trump’s tax returns, and Republicans are panicking




Trump and the GOP would vastly prefer a permanent deep burial as distant as possible from any sunlight.
 
Trump and the GOP would vastly prefer a permanent deep burial as distant as possible from any sunlight.

As long as they tuck Trump in there with them, I'm on board.

I think we've found a bipartisan solution!
 
We may finally see Trump’s tax returns, and Republicans are panicking




Trump and the GOP would vastly prefer a permanent deep burial as distant as possible from any sunlight.

Just remember, if they can do it to Trump they can do it to you too....and Republicans can do it to Democrats (assuming they ever manage to get elected again). Tax returns could be made a public record just to make sure that nobody is getting over on anyone else. I mean, it would be important to know if your neighbor really deducted their veterinary bills last year while you were honest and didn't, right?
 

Every democratic president has made their tax records public knowledge.
 
Every democratic president has made their tax records public knowledge.

And so has every republican president.


Except one.

Not to mention every democratic and republican (and probably independent) nominee who has ran for President over the last 40 years or so.

Luther’s concerns are a bit.... odd.
 
Every democratic president has made their tax records public knowledge.

There is no Constitutional requirement for anyone to release their tax returns. As such, it's a matter of personal privacy and should be respected...unless you don't believe anyone should have personal privacy.
 

Wrong
 
There is no Constitutional requirement for anyone to release their tax returns. As such, it's a matter of personal privacy and should be respected...unless you don't believe anyone should have personal privacy.

Everyone should have personal privacy except someone campaigning to be the President of the United States. I want to see his or her tax returns before I vote for them.
 

The IRS can audit me anytime. Trump is the first presidential candidate in 48 years to refuse to release his tax returns.

That's presidential candidate, not simply president. We're talking hundreds of individuals?
 
Last edited:
Must be nice to just violate a person's RIGHT TO PRIVACY whenever one wants. Talk about abuse of power.
 
There is no Constitutional requirement for anyone to release their tax returns. As such, it's a matter of personal privacy and should be respected...unless you don't believe anyone should have personal privacy.

His wealth and his business dealings are not a matter of privacy because of his own choice to run for president.

The fact he has not been transparent to a minimum degree and has not properly divested himself of his business interests SHOULD concern any good, thinking citizen.

But then there is Trump supporters.
 
All Republicans, but particularly Trump, have a lot to fear. They've been obstructionists covering up for Trump for two years. As the saying goes, 'the chickens are coming home to roost' and what goes around comes around. Although Trump was absolutely frantic in the weeks up to the mid-term elections, he pulled every trick out of his bag of tricks to get voters to vote Republican. "A vote for (insert name) is really a vote for me!" Trump never really understood what would happen if Democrats gained a majority in the House. But, he's about to find out.

Jerry Nadler
is Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. Matt Whitaker is scheduled to appear before this committee on Friday and as insurance he has a subpoena "in an abundance of caution" in his back pocket to ensure Whitaker testifies and doesn't rely on executive privilege to avoid answering questions. If Matt Whitaker doesn't show up, Jerry Nadler will use that subpoena to force him to appear.

Trump's history with Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York dates to the 1980s, when they battled over Manhattan real estate while Nadler was in the New York State Assembly before he was elected to Congress. In his 2000 book, "The America We Deserve," Trump called Nadler "one of the most egregious hacks in contemporary politics." "This guy wanted to put a railroad yard on the same property where I wanted to build a park and create the best middle-income housing in New York," Trump wrote in his book. If Democrats do to try to impeach Trump, Nadler will be one of the most important Democrats in the caucus -- and will likely face the breadth of Trump's backlash.

Elijah Cummings
is the new Chairman of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee. He thinks the president violates the Constitution’s emoluments clause on a daily basis, and sees an abnormal tolerance for corruption and misconduct emanating straight out of the Oval Office. Elijah Cummings is just as troubled by the notion that the Republican Congress had fallen flat on its constitutional duty to check the administration. As Chairman, Elijah Cummings now has subpoena power and the ability to call as many hearings as he wants on whichever topics he chooses.

Maxine Waters
is the Congresswoman that's going to sting the worse since it was Maxine Waters that has been the target of his bigotry for two years referring to her as 'low IQ Maxine'. Maxine Waters is now the Ranking Member of the Financial Services Committee and she has the power power to subpoena, not only Trump’s personal tax returns, but she can subpoena bank executives for investigations.

Richard Neal
is Chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee Chairman. It will be Rep. Richard Neal who will have the job of asking for Trump's tax returns. While modern presidential nominees have publicly released their returns, Trump has defied the norm, which Democrats argue must be remedied.Under IRS rules, there are only three people on Capitol Hill who can ask the Treasury Department for the President's tax returns: the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, the head of the Joint Committee on Taxation and the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Neal is the only Democrat. Richard Neal is building a case to ask for Trump's tax returns.
https://www.bostonherald.com/2019/02/04/tv-ads-call-on-us-rep-neal-to-subpoena-trump-tax-returns/

Senator Adam Schiff is now the Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee. Trump may regret referring to lawyer Adam Schiff as Sleazy Adam Schiff, Liddle' Adam Schiff and most recently "little Adam Schitt". Adam Schiff served in the House Intelligence Committee last year as co-Chair with Devin Nunes. Adam Schiff has accused Republicans of failing to investigate the ties between Trump's team and Russia, and he's promised to restart his committee's Russia investigation in several areas. Among them: Schiff wants to investigate questions about Russian money laundering, to learn who Donald Trump Jr. was calling as he set up the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting and to interview officials the committee has yet to speak to, like Michael Flynn.
 
Everyone should have personal privacy except someone campaigning to be the President of the United States. I want to see his or her tax returns before I vote for them.

No you don't.

You have never read the tax returns of any president you've voter for.
 
hey, nothing to hide, nothing to worry about, right? that's what Republicans told me back when i was a libertarian, anyway.
 
It is both reassuring and refreshing that we get at least half of Congress who finally understands the Constitution and is ready to undertake their oversight responsibilities after the two year abdication of the same.
 
No you don't.

You have never read the tax returns of any president you've voter for.

Ha! Good point. I have never wanted to see the tax returns of any presidential candidate I've ever voted for. Probably because none of them have ever kept them hidden. Funny how that works.
 
I wanna see the tax returns of Nancy Pelosi. Every single year since she started earning a paycheck.
 
I wanna see the tax returns of Nancy Pelosi. Every single year since she started earning a paycheck.

Is she running for President?
 
There is no Constitutional requirement for anyone to release their tax returns....


No, it's a legal requirement.

As Al Capone found out.



For some reason, you seem as reluctant as the president to see his tax returns released ?
 
Is she running for President?

No, but she's still is a representative in the United States government. Also, her husband has been involved in at least 1 shady deal (See: Visa's stock), I want to see if she may have had her mitts in the jar. That seems only fair, since that's close to what the House Democrat pusbags are filling up their undies about with Trump.

Next, I want to see Mad Magazine Maxine's taxes. She got $12M in bailout funds to her husband's bank. What else has she gotten?
 
It is both reassuring and refreshing that we get at least half of Congress who finally understands the Constitution and is ready to undertake their oversight responsibilities after the two year abdication of the same.

Such oversight does not include access to the president's tax returns.
 
No, it's a legal requirement.

As Al Capone found out.



For some reason, you seem as reluctant as the president to see his tax returns released ?

It's a legal requirement to pay your taxes but definitely not a legal requirement to open them up for public scrutiny or political scrutiny.
 
Cookies are required to use this site. You must accept them to continue using the site. Learn more…