• We will be taking the forum down at 9 AM CST for maintenance. Please try back later
  • This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Washington Post -- Trump And Musk Shutting Down USAID Has Already Caused Nearly 300,000 Deaths Worldwide So Far

When it comes down to who is more credible - an anonymous poster in cyberspace or the longtime fact-checker in the wapo - I go with the latter.
My dear, you are free to believe the data I've given you or whatever the WaPo says. Your choice, and I'm not going to waste any more time on it.
 
Do you think I'm going to try to define life-saving for someone who doesn't even understand the words in the waiver, "... life-saving humanitarian assistance applies to core life-saving medicine, medical services, food, shelter, and subsistence assistance, as well as supplies and reasonable administrative costs as necessary to deliver such assistance."?
As I've noted two times now: the trump administration didn't define "life-saving". That's a glaring omission, when it comes to the administration that summarily shut down and cut off global aid.

Look, I wrote and negotiated contracts for the DoD. That's where I learned the importance of wording. And of definitions. If you don't want to accept that "life-saving" can and does mean different things to people and in different contexts, there's nothing I can do to help you.
 
It's not what I "want to believe." I was trying to put the numbers (177 global health awards) into context. Some of those awards obviously have to do with delivering health care, but not all of them do.
As for critical thinking, I believe you'll find that's what I'm doing, as compared to your accepting what Kessler says just because Kessler says it. And, frankly, because it's what you want to believe. He said that "tens or hundreds of thousands of people died" because of the freeze, and then provides evidence of five people.
Still waiting for you to acknowledge that some people have died from Trump and Musk shutting down USAID.

But a dishonest MAGA like you cannot even do that. Instead, you want to keep whining about the calculation model used.
 
Satan is happy I bet.

More death, pain and suffering.
 
Director on USAID Project Arrested for Nine-Year Fraud Scheme
May 7, 2025 · FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE. Boston, Massachusetts - On April 29, 2025, U.S. Agency for International Development Office of Inspector General (USAID OIG) Special …
There’s A Culture Of Corruption’: Former USAID Director ... - IJR
Feb 5, 2025 · A former U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) director appeared Wednesday on Fox News to reveal details on what he said were the agency’s misused resources and deeply rooted corruption
Gee, no headlines about the millions of lives saved every year.

Why not? I guess they weren't important to you.

USAID Funding Saved Millions of Children’s Lives.
 
Did they find anything close to a trillion???

No, they did not. So now you are reduced to pathetic equivocating. Sad.
Actually finding what they claimed they would find is not what is important to MAGATS et al, what is the only important thing is what DOGE and KING MAGAT aka Donny Trump claimed they would find!
 
If they really cared they would not be stealing from the funding
Time to shut down the entire $1 trillion Department of Defense.....since there are literally billions of dollars completely unaccounted for.

Just using your MAGA "logic", dude.
 
Washington Post -- Trump And Musk Shutting Down USAID Has Already Caused Nearly 300,000 Deaths Worldwide So Far
:eek::rolleyes::D:ROFLMAO:

No one compliments WaPo on their restraint, then they use themselves as the fact-checker

While the new blood feud between the two biggest assholes on planet Earth is quite amusing, it's important to remind everyone about the horrific cost to humanity that these two evil ****s Trump and Musk have caused to the world so far. --

Nicholas Kristof cited a study by the Center for Global Development that estimated how many lives are saved each year by American dollars: about 1.7 million HIV/AIDS deaths averted; 550,000 saved because of other humanitarian assistance; 300,000 tuberculosis deaths prevented; and nearly 300,000 malaria deaths forestalled. But that shows the positive impact of U.S. assistance, not what happens when it is withdrawn.

Brooke Nichols, a Boston University infectious-disease mathematical modeler and health economist, has developed a tracker that attempts to fill this gap. As of Monday, the model shows, about 96,000 adults and 200,000 children have died because of the administration’s cutbacks to funding for aid groups and support organizations. The overall death count grows by 103 people an hour.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/05/28/rubio-aid-cuts-deaths-fact-checker/
It has been established that less than 1/5th of the money was spent as designated. The State Department also took over several USAID programs.

I don't see a word about either of those points, just the bombast.
 
:eek::rolleyes::D:ROFLMAO:

No one compliments WaPo on their restraint, then they use themselves as the fact-checker


It has been established that less than 1/5th of the money was spent as designated. The State Department also took over several USAID programs.

I don't see a word about either of those points, just the bombast.
I would not be surprised at that which I made bold. For a curious minded person might you have a source link to that establishing data?

If not, thanks anyway.
 
Time to shut down the entire $1 trillion Department of Defense.....since there are literally billions of dollars completely unaccounted for.

Just using your MAGA "logic", dude.
Why do you tolerate the greedy corrupt Democrats politicians stealing from the poor.
 
:eek::rolleyes::D:ROFLMAO:

No one compliments WaPo on their restraint, then they use themselves as the fact-checker


It has been established that less than 1/5th of the money was spent as designated. The State Department also took over several USAID programs.
It hasn't been "established"....except in your MAGA mind.

Provide evidence or you will just be ignored.
 
I would not be surprised at that which I made bold. For a curious minded person might you have a source link to that establishing data?

If not, thanks anyway.

The keyword is directly. The bulk of USAID's money went to Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) and international organizations. In both cases, transparency is restricted.

This is not specific to USAID.
 

The keyword is directly. The bulk of USAID's money went to Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) and international organizations. In both cases, transparency is restricted.

This is not specific to USAID.
You said the money was not spent "as designated". That is incorrect. Paying salaries of aid workers and other administrative costs are always part of contracts and delivering goods.

That is not fraud by any stretch of the imagination.
 
If they really cared they would not be stealing from the funding
Who are "they"? Everyone involved? A few bad apples?

How much of the money gets to where it's needed?

If thieves steal 10 percent, isn't it great that the remainder gets to people in desperate need?
 
Is there any reason why they couldn't have simply rooted out the corruption instead of causing such misery to millions of people?

That wouldn't be nearly as cruel or senseless. Inflicting senseless cruelty is the point.
 
Nope. They found about $200 billion. Over ten years, that's $2 trillion.

No, I'm just forced to believe what I had thought about you.
And, how would finding $200 billion this year ever mean that they will continue to find $200 billion each year for the next nine years? Does your brain shut down because critical thinking is a foreign concept to you?
 
And, how would finding $200 billion this year ever mean that they will continue to find $200 billion each year for the next nine years?
It doesn't, and the people who found it this year won't be in control for all of the next nine years. We can only hope that the people who are in control understand what's going to happen to all the non-discretionary budget items if they don't.

I'm going to ignore the next gratuitous insult. I just figure that some people can't resist the anonymity of the internet.
 
The money is still being spent as designated. That is not fraud.
When a charity spends more than 5% of receipts on overhead it's considered high.

You assume--without checking apparently--that 15 times that is acceptable.

There is probably no difference between how money is allocated on USAID contracts vs other Federal government contracts.
You say probably.

Do you have a shred of evidence to back that up?
 
When a charity spends more than 5% of receipts on overhead it's considered high.

You assume--without checking apparently--that 15 times that is acceptable.


You say probably.

Do you have a shred of evidence to back that up?
Are you also demanding that the Dept of Defense be shut down, since there are literally billions of dollars that are unaccounted for and the DoD has not passed a financial audit in years?

Be consistent....after all, I wouldn't want you to come across as a total MAGA hypocrite. That would just break my heart.
 
Are you also demanding that the Dept of Defense be shut down, since there are literally billions of dollars that are unaccounted for and the DoD has not passed a financial audit in years?
Deflection noted.

USAID is literally billions of dollars that are unaccounted for.

Be consistent....after all, I wouldn't want you to come across as a total MAGA hypocrite.
I have been entirely consistent.

That would just break my heart.
Only one of us is coming across unprepared.
 
Back
Top Bottom