You seem to be trying to sway people who haven't clicked on the links and looked at the info by misrepresenting what is said in those links.
Jay Windly and his fellow pro-Apollo posters got caught telling a clear lie in their analyses of the hoax evidence. I'll post what is said so that you can't misrepresent it.
ApolloHoax.net - Rover Footage Filmed on Earth
(excerpt)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...when you said that it was impossible to make sand dust-free by sifting and washing it.
"We know why the dust forms. You just say it somehow didn't happen again during handling after washing and sifting. And those of us who have handled such treated particules know what we're talking about. You, who refuse to acquire any practical understanding of the process, do not."
There's nothing impossible about sifting some sand and washing and scrubbing it until it's dust free and then placing it where the rover is going to drive.
"It has been clearly explained to you many times why it's impossible to handle particulates without generating dust. You simply say that it somehow didn't happen in this case, but do not say why."
Spinning wheels over dust-free sand would not cause enough sand to erode into dust to make a cloud.
"The majority of the dust is created as it is removed from the washing apparatus, conveyed to the photography site, and laid down -- not right as the rover wheels pass over it. The rover wheels would aerosolize the dust that was created in those prior steps."
This whole idea of not being able to make sand dust-free is totally silly.
"Not to the people who have actually tried to do it. And that would not be you.
And the whole idea that dust-free sand would exhibit the properties you say you see in the videos is also totally silly. Even if you could make it and get enough of it under the wheels without creating more dust, it still wouldn't be ejected from the wheels in air in the "obviously non-parabolic" way you say.
Not only is your sand made magical by the impossible process you say created it, but also by its uncanny ability to selectively defy the laws of aerodynamics -- laws you admit you don't understand."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A strange scenario re sifted sand | GeologyRocks
(excerpts)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would expect perfectly dry, very fine sand to be kicked up into the atmosphere and produce a bit of dust, depending on the speed of the vehicle (I think a wind speed of 20km/h will lift a 0.1mm grain into suspension). But then coarse sand would not be so easily put into suspension; hence no dust cloud.
Moving and sifting sand is unlikely to produce any finer grains (unless you really go at it and whack it with hammers or something!). However, I think it highly unlikely you could wash and sieve several tonnes of sand and get it all the same grain size...
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
transportation and dumping the sand will not be enough to cause dust creation unless you had a very dirty an dusty transport container.
driving a vehicle thru it will not creat dust either (unless you repeat the process insanely often to grind down the sand grains)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As can be seen in the above, Jay Windley said that he knew from experience that transporting and placing dust-free sand would cause enough erosion to create enough dust to form a dust cloud when the sand is driven over. This is false. Jay Windley lied.
Here's something else.
ApolloHoax.net - Difference in Body Movements
All they did was tap dance around this issue and adopt the attitude that they'd debunked the alleged anomaly.
Anyone who actually reads the threads at Clavius can see that those people are professional sophists. Sophists have a hard time obfuscating physics though.
