• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Was the Current Madness Birthed in the University?

VySky

Supporting Member
DP Veteran
Joined
Sep 12, 2019
Messages
50,585
Reaction score
19,982
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Moderate
As the article describes.

America is sick.

And of course Rep. Ilhan Omar said Kirk mourners are "full of s**t.

But she is only part of the problem.

Key quote


"The left knows that black males, age 15-40, commit well over 50 percent of the most violent crimes in America, while comprising about 3 percent of the population. They know it and privately navigate accordingly, but few speak of it, and none seem to have answers to it. So the topic remains taboo."

==================================

"Dowd, who was subsequently fired by an embarrassed MSNBC president, only took his cue from anchorwoman, the untouchable Katy Tur, who first editorialized Kirk as a “divisive” figure. By her logic, would that mean that, say, a Bernie Sanders or Zohran Mamdani would also be divisive? What does Joe Biden, by Tur’s logic, deserve after labeling half the country as “semi-fascists” or reducing them to “garbage,” “chumps,” and “dregs”—or boasting he’d like to take Trump behind the gym and beat him up?

Does Tur mean that anyone deemed “divisive” then should naturally expect what befell Charlie Kirk?

Yet, in truth, Charlie Kirk was an upbeat, happy warrior not unlike William F. Buckley in his youth, willing to politely debate political opponents without anger and bias.

The multimillionaire socialist Rep. Ilhan Omar, who once claimed that the Trump “dictatorship” was worse than what she had fled from in her native Somalia, claimed the slain Kirk mourners were “full of sh-t” in a long, incoherent rant. Such creepy examples could be easily multiplied, such as the accustomed lunacy of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She now claimed that those who block gun control legislation could not blame others for inciting the violence: i.e., Charlie Kirk should have expected to reap what he sowed."
.


 
The "Key Quote" in your post can't be talked about, because if you do, YOU ARE A RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
The "Key Quote" in your post can't be talked about, because if you do, YOU ARE A RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How can only 3% be such a deadly cancer among our society?
 
18ef61b3-9fa1-4583-a3bd-f41dfecae5ad_text.gif
 
The "Key Quote" in your post can't be talked about, because if you do, YOU ARE A RACIST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Racism is a way overused word.....bigotry and prejudice are more appropriate
 
As the article describes.

America is sick.

And of course Rep. Ilhan Omar said Kirk mourners are "full of s**t.

But she is only part of the problem.

Key quote


"The left knows that black males, age 15-40, commit well over 50 percent of the most violent crimes in America, while comprising about 3 percent of the population. They know it and privately navigate accordingly, but few speak of it, and none seem to have answers to it. So the topic remains taboo."

==================================

"Dowd, who was subsequently fired by an embarrassed MSNBC president, only took his cue from anchorwoman, the untouchable Katy Tur, who first editorialized Kirk as a “divisive” figure. By her logic, would that mean that, say, a Bernie Sanders or Zohran Mamdani would also be divisive? What does Joe Biden, by Tur’s logic, deserve after labeling half the country as “semi-fascists” or reducing them to “garbage,” “chumps,” and “dregs”—or boasting he’d like to take Trump behind the gym and beat him up?

Does Tur mean that anyone deemed “divisive” then should naturally expect what befell Charlie Kirk?

Yet, in truth, Charlie Kirk was an upbeat, happy warrior not unlike William F. Buckley in his youth, willing to politely debate political opponents without anger and bias.

The multimillionaire socialist Rep. Ilhan Omar, who once claimed that the Trump “dictatorship” was worse than what she had fled from in her native Somalia, claimed the slain Kirk mourners were “full of sh-t” in a long, incoherent rant. Such creepy examples could be easily multiplied, such as the accustomed lunacy of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She now claimed that those who block gun control legislation could not blame others for inciting the violence: i.e., Charlie Kirk should have expected to reap what he sowed."
.



The current madness was birthed in the cobwebbed skull of Donald J. Trump.
 
As the article describes.

America is sick.

And of course Rep. Ilhan Omar said Kirk mourners are "full of s**t.

But she is only part of the problem.

Key quote


"The left knows that black males, age 15-40, commit well over 50 percent of the most violent crimes in America, while comprising about 3 percent of the population. They know it and privately navigate accordingly, but few speak of it, and none seem to have answers to it. So the topic remains taboo."

==================================

"Dowd, who was subsequently fired by an embarrassed MSNBC president, only took his cue from anchorwoman, the untouchable Katy Tur, who first editorialized Kirk as a “divisive” figure. By her logic, would that mean that, say, a Bernie Sanders or Zohran Mamdani would also be divisive? What does Joe Biden, by Tur’s logic, deserve after labeling half the country as “semi-fascists” or reducing them to “garbage,” “chumps,” and “dregs”—or boasting he’d like to take Trump behind the gym and beat him up?

Does Tur mean that anyone deemed “divisive” then should naturally expect what befell Charlie Kirk?

Yet, in truth, Charlie Kirk was an upbeat, happy warrior not unlike William F. Buckley in his youth, willing to politely debate political opponents without anger and bias.

The multimillionaire socialist Rep. Ilhan Omar, who once claimed that the Trump “dictatorship” was worse than what she had fled from in her native Somalia, claimed the slain Kirk mourners were “full of sh-t” in a long, incoherent rant. Such creepy examples could be easily multiplied, such as the accustomed lunacy of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She now claimed that those who block gun control legislation could not blame others for inciting the violence: i.e., Charlie Kirk should have expected to reap what he sowed."
.



William F. Buckley was a notorious racist.
 
As the article describes.

America is sick.

And of course Rep. Ilhan Omar said Kirk mourners are "full of s**t.

But she is only part of the problem.

Key quote


"The left knows that black males, age 15-40, commit well over 50 percent of the most violent crimes in America, while comprising about 3 percent of the population. They know it and privately navigate accordingly, but few speak of it, and none seem to have answers to it. So the topic remains taboo."

==================================

"Dowd, who was subsequently fired by an embarrassed MSNBC president, only took his cue from anchorwoman, the untouchable Katy Tur, who first editorialized Kirk as a “divisive” figure. By her logic, would that mean that, say, a Bernie Sanders or Zohran Mamdani would also be divisive? What does Joe Biden, by Tur’s logic, deserve after labeling half the country as “semi-fascists” or reducing them to “garbage,” “chumps,” and “dregs”—or boasting he’d like to take Trump behind the gym and beat him up?

Does Tur mean that anyone deemed “divisive” then should naturally expect what befell Charlie Kirk?

Yet, in truth, Charlie Kirk was an upbeat, happy warrior not unlike William F. Buckley in his youth, willing to politely debate political opponents without anger and bias.

The multimillionaire socialist Rep. Ilhan Omar, who once claimed that the Trump “dictatorship” was worse than what she had fled from in her native Somalia, claimed the slain Kirk mourners were “full of sh-t” in a long, incoherent rant. Such creepy examples could be easily multiplied, such as the accustomed lunacy of Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. She now claimed that those who block gun control legislation could not blame others for inciting the violence: i.e., Charlie Kirk should have expected to reap what he sowed."
.


Charlie Kirk said:

I know what you're thinking, we've got to get Joe Biden out of the way so we can run against Kammy. Oh my goodness, is she beatable. It's like Black Hillary on steroids. Is she Black? I guess she says she's Caribbean or whatever. ...
She would be a lot easier to beat than Joe Biden. Joe Biden is a bumbling dementia filled Alzheimer's corrupt tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America.

Please make it happen in Charlie Kirk's memory!

MAGA.
 
Racism is a way overused word.....bigotry and prejudice are more appropriate
OK, so do think to discuss those statistics about black people show bigotry and prejudice?
 
OK, so do think to discuss those statistics about black people show bigotry and prejudice?

"The left knows that black males, age 15-40, commit well over 50 percent of the most violent crimes in America, while comprising about 3 percent of the population."

Can't speak for the so-called left (whatever that means today) but I don't believe those statistics for a second. They look like the author of the piece just pulled them out of their ass and to blindly accept them uncritically is definitely a sign of bigotry and prejudice.
 
"Trans advocate"?

Can someone show me where and when the shooter was "advocating for trans rights"?
 
OK, so do think to discuss those statistics about black people show bigotry and prejudice?
Yes to a certain degree because it stops at race as being somehow the root cause.
 
White males make up 29% of the US population but make up 70% of the rapes, 62% of the aggravated assaults, 46% of the murders, and 75% of all sex offences.

Black males actually make up around 6% of the US population but both white males and black males using your method are very over represented in US crime statistics.

I want to point out, there's some heavy shadyness going on here. Males are 50% of the population but make up a vast majority of violent crime, probably in the 90%ish range. If you take any group of males as a % of total population they are going to be over represented in relation to their overall % of the population
 
Last edited:
OK, so do think to discuss those statistics about black people show bigotry and prejudice?

It does when you don't take into account the circumstances that created the environments that those statistics come from. When you imply it happens simply because its who they are, you bet your ass its prejudiced and bigotted.
 
Yes to a certain degree because it stops at race as being somehow the root cause.
So, when there is white on black crime, what is the "root" cause, versus black on white crime?
 
It does when you don't take into account the circumstances that created the environments that those statistics come from. When you imply it happens simply because its who they are, you bet your ass its prejudiced and bigotted.
So, if that is true, how does one address the statistics, if we can't talk about it?
 
So, when there is white on black crime, what is the "root" cause, versus black on white crime?
What the hell does that even mean? Race is not the root cause of crime. To suggest it is is racism.
 
So, if that is true, how does one address the statistics, if we can't talk about it?

What exactly do you mean by "address the statistics?"

If you mean clutch your pearls about scary black people, there's no way to do that without your racism slip showing.
 
White males make up 29% of the US population but make up 70% of the rapes, 62% of the aggravated assaults, 46% of the murders, and 75% of all sex offences.

Black males actually make up around 6% of the US population but both white males and black males using your method are very over represented in US crime statistics.

I want to point out, there's some heavy shadyness going on here. Males are 50% of the population but make up a vast majority of violent crime, probably in the 90%ish range. If you take any group of males as a % of total population they are going to be over represented in relation to their overall % of the population
Based on the OP logic, I will caution my daughter to avoid dating white men.
🤭
 
Back
Top Bottom