Did Jesus believe in collective or common ownership of the means of production??
Absolutely not. Yet my discussion with Sangha indicates that He was. Furthermore, I've heard such statements from ideological liberals before. Of course, not all liberals believe this,
yet I've never heard He was a socialist from conservatives.
Absolutely not. Yet my discussion with Sangha indicates that He was. Furthermore, I've heard such statements from ideological liberals before. Of course, not all liberals believe this, yet I've never heard He was a socialist from conservatives.
My favorite line from liberals.
Basically, confirmation?
there is a history of it on this forum :/dishonesty at its finest.
I rarely hear Liberals refer to Jesus as a "Socialist".
this is a call-out thread.
This does not matter.
But yes Jesus did seem like quite a socialist..
Jesus, if he even existed, believed in helping the poor, the sick, the lost, the downtrodden, the hungry.
He did NOT believe in govt. confiscating the resources of the few wealthy and redistributing it to the masses.
Nevermind the fact that Jesus pre-dates Socialism by 1,900 years.
Jesus, if he even existed, believed in helping the poor, the sick, the lost, the downtrodden, the hungry.
He did NOT believe in govt. confiscating the resources of the few wealthy and redistributing it to the masses.
Nevermind the fact that Jesus pre-dates Socialism by 1,900 years.
Jesus, if he even existed, believed in helping the poor, the sick, the lost, the downtrodden, the hungry.
He did NOT believe in govt. confiscating the resources of the few wealthy and redistributing it to the masses.
Nevermind the fact that Jesus pre-dates Socialism by 1,900 years.
When Jesus heard this, he said to him, "You still lack one thing. Sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."
So there's at least two liberals/socialists within an hour that seem to think He was a socialist..
Holy **** you said something semi-intelligent
Nevertheless, "govt. confiscating the resources of the few wealthy and redistributing it to the masses" is not the definition of socialism.
My favorite line from liberals.
Basically, confirmation?
And you said I was being intellectually dishonest; and when I say liberals, I don't mean "all". I never imply "all".
So there's at least two liberals/socialists within an hour that seem to think He was a socialist.
It does matter to Christians; it's insulting. Imagine if Allah was deemed a Nazi.
"socialist" isn't a pejorative term on the same level as "Nazi," and is only deemed as such by those who don't really know what it means.
no, but this is one of the many things that Socialist govts. tend to do. Very high taxes on the wealthy to provide for a massive welfare-state for the middle-class and poor.
...which I can't say I necessarily disagree with.![]()
well, if you're now talking about me, you're being very very dishonest.
I didn't say Jesus was a Socialist. I said he wanted people to care for the poor, the sick, the weak, the downtrodden, the hungry, and children.
Does doing such things, make someone a Socialist????
care to tell that to the Salvation Army and the Red Cross??????
I didn't mean you.
I agree with you.