Fledermaus
DP Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2014
- Messages
- 121,421
- Reaction score
- 32,421
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
Go get "it".
You can't be more specific of straightforward than that.
"It" being what?
Violence?
Go get "it".
You can't be more specific of straightforward than that.
Would that characterize their actions and statements as saying ,' it'll never work, but we gotta try anyway?
In this recording he sounds deliberate.
I still insist that they very much wanted it to happen, and that if an attempt fails, the perpetrator does not suddenly become innocent, and I believe they thought if the question could be taken to SCOTUS, the conservative court would 'vote' for trump.
from page 2 of the first Eastman memo:
"Let the other side challenge his actions in court, where Tribe (who in 2001 conceded the President of the Senate might be in charge of counting the votes) and others who would press a lawsuit would have their past position -- that these are non-justiciable political questions – thrown back at them, to get the lawsuit dismissed."
I listened to the recording, but how do you think it proves criminal intent? If a lawyer tries to float a measure that the court finds unconstitutional, the lawyer is not put in jail for having advanced an inapplicable argument.
Again, it goes without saying that the President's team is going to try to delay the vote count, just as did the Dems in 2017. I know you prefer to keep the argument in a bubble, but the 2017 attempt to unseat Trump was legal chicanery of the same type, even if it's possible (once proved) that other illegal acts were committed. Why were you not scandalized when the Dems tried to delay a lawful vote count in 2017? Does the riot make the difference in your eyes, or are we talking more partisan reasons?
I never used the word proof.
You used the words ' think it proves'.
I didn't but you did.
Now you are showing me that you also have twice tried to minimize what occurred by making the absurd claim that the Dems did the same in 2017.
This shows me 2 things.
You jump to conclusions and then deny facts.
You don't know the facts but you continue posting about them anyway.
I'm finished with your nonsense.
What is this repeated '2017' reference?Too bad. Guess I’ll never know why you posted the Giuliani tape if you didn’t think it provided at least circumstantial evidence, or if you think the 2017 Dems did anything immoral.
Probably this.What is this repeated '2017' reference?
And yet you celebrate Kyle Rittenhouse killing two people. You're pissed because Babbitt was trying to stop Biden's election and she failed. The cop shot your criminal hero. She took the risk, she paid the price.Some 120 lb weakling would have wrestled her to the ground and stopped her.
Apparently the capitol police training has not yielded anyone of that caliber. They need more work so they can take down women.
Do you think for a minute that Trump wasn't advised before his speech that it wouldn't be a good idea to move them to the capitol? We know his team was because we have testimony from the rally organizers. So, either way, Trump knew they were planning to assault the capitol, or he went off script and incited the bunch.We’re still waiting for hard evidence that any government officials had foreknowledge of the small group’s plans. Until you got that, you got nothing.
I have news for you: he really IS dumb. He isn’t playing anything.Do you think for a minute that Trump wasn't advised before his speech that it wouldn't be a good idea to move them to the capitol? We know his team was because we have testimony from the rally organizers. So, either way, Trump knew they were planning to assault the capitol, or he went off script and incited the bunch.
Naturally, Trump is going to play dumb. It's what he does best.
Do you think for a minute that Trump wasn't advised before his speech that it wouldn't be a good idea to move them to the capitol? We know his team was because we have testimony from the rally organizers. So, either way, Trump knew they were planning to assault the capitol, or he went off script and incited the bunch.
Naturally, Trump is going to play dumb. It's what he does best.
And yet you celebrate Kyle Rittenhouse killing two people. You're pissed because Babbitt was trying to stop Biden's election and she failed. The cop shot your criminal hero. She took the risk, she paid the price.
Republicans are all about "personal responsibility" as long as it's for everyone but them.
The true threat is the possibility that the jackass will steal another four year as president.
In reference to the attempt, from the get-go, to make the country ungovernable. I decry January 6, 2021 but do you think the antics of the "mostly peaceful protesters" were any better?What is this repeated '2017' reference?
Only from the rest home, if that's even allowed.The true threat is the possibility that the jackass will steal another four year as president.
I thought it was the Mad Lib narrative that Trump was going to do hard time. What's this rest home jazz?Only from the rest home, if that's even allowed.